Any updates on the MR with SST?
Another i U.K. with SST
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=196936
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=196936
Looks like HKS has done quite a lot with the unmodible MR:
http://www.windowslivetranslator.com...hi%2Fevo10.htm
Bottom line is at the bottom. Power and torque: 382.3PS @ 6230rpm, 48.9kg-m @ 4360 rpm; Normal 288.6PS @ 7020 rpm, 44.9kg-m 4040rpm. The online converters I used came up with 377 hp and 354 ft-lbs of torque, up from 285 hp and 325 ft-lbs of torque. As far as I can tell, the SST's TCM was not touched. I guess it's fair to say that an increase in torque of less than 10% is within the TCM's parameters?
http://www.windowslivetranslator.com...hi%2Fevo10.htm
Bottom line is at the bottom. Power and torque: 382.3PS @ 6230rpm, 48.9kg-m @ 4360 rpm; Normal 288.6PS @ 7020 rpm, 44.9kg-m 4040rpm. The online converters I used came up with 377 hp and 354 ft-lbs of torque, up from 285 hp and 325 ft-lbs of torque. As far as I can tell, the SST's TCM was not touched. I guess it's fair to say that an increase in torque of less than 10% is within the TCM's parameters?
Prior experience tells them there are plenty of f*ckin idiots queuing up to destroy their new SST, on their new 2009 MR, just like they did the clutch on the EVO VIII.
Looks like HKS has done quite a lot with the unmodible MR:
http://www.windowslivetranslator.com...hi%2Fevo10.htm
Bottom line is at the bottom. Power and torque: 382.3PS @ 6230rpm, 48.9kg-m @ 4360 rpm; Normal 288.6PS @ 7020 rpm, 44.9kg-m 4040rpm. The online converters I used came up with 377 hp and 354 ft-lbs of torque, up from 285 hp and 325 ft-lbs of torque. As far as I can tell, the SST's TCM was not touched. I guess it's fair to say that an increase in torque of less than 10% is within the TCM's parameters?
http://www.windowslivetranslator.com...hi%2Fevo10.htm
Bottom line is at the bottom. Power and torque: 382.3PS @ 6230rpm, 48.9kg-m @ 4360 rpm; Normal 288.6PS @ 7020 rpm, 44.9kg-m 4040rpm. The online converters I used came up with 377 hp and 354 ft-lbs of torque, up from 285 hp and 325 ft-lbs of torque. As far as I can tell, the SST's TCM was not touched. I guess it's fair to say that an increase in torque of less than 10% is within the TCM's parameters?
because they are on the wheel ,than is awesome!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OneCrzyEvo21
For Sale - Interior / Exterior / Sound / Styling
4
May 24, 2016 10:57 PM
aznx1nvazn
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
25
Jul 5, 2008 07:01 AM



We are waiting too for SST EVO X .Rest of Europe get the first EVO in July 2008





