Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Official 2012 Formula One Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 07:54 AM
  #361  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by GG06MR
"...So....for the third time, give me an example where equal cars and equal drivers has resulted in a championship. Until then, opinions are like A-holes only applies to YOU.
No need to get snippy about the A-hole comment for if U had read it carefully U would have noted that I included myself ...that said, I said that using a Championship as a determinant of driver strategy is confounded by the speed/handling of the car but U apparently have discounted this concern...so I shall try to go down UR "road" dispite these concerns by citing McLaren, I believe won the Constructors with Mika Hakkinen and Coultard running in 1998 or 1999. Both those cars were equal relative to each other i.e., one car was not preferentially treated differently than the other. Yes, Hakkinen was faster than Coultard but it wasn't bc he had a superior performing car.

Later, Ken

Last edited by KPerez; Mar 28, 2012 at 08:01 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 08:02 AM
  #362  
honda-guy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 37
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by Crester
The F1 website put up posting about the Mercedes front wing... even after reading it tho... I still don't understand exactly how their W-Duct system works... lol

http://www.formula1.com/news/technic...2/865/949.html
i'm not an aerodynamicist but i think this is how it works. the curve area of the wing produce low pressure (air has to move faster to get around it) and the higher pressure on the other side is what push the wing. on an airplane, the curve area is no top (low pressure) and the higher pressure on the bottom push the wing up. on the race, it's the opposite, the curve area is on the bottom creating low pressure. so if they feed more air to the lower pressure part of the wing, then there will be less of a pressure difference between top and bottom, hence less down force. it's the same idea as the previous "F" duct for the rear wing, only this is for the front wing and instead of controlling by driver, it's controlled through DSR (which is driver controlled anyway).
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 11:03 AM
  #363  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by Crester
The F1 website put up posting about the Mercedes front wing... even after reading it tho... I still don't understand exactly how their W-Duct system works... lol

http://www.formula1.com/news/technic...2/865/949.html
Don't confuse the DRS activated duct with the W-duct. They are very different systems only similar in that they both affect the front wing. More info here: http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/

l8r)
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 11:31 AM
  #364  
SamsonEvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 1
From: 10,000 frozen lakes
This is why I take breaks from this thread from time to time. I get tired of some of the comments made by the person in question. I get tired of reading copying and pasting blogs that usually are way off in their information. This thread should be fun and interesting, not about big egos and being contentious. I totally agree with your assessment about said individual. You might remember a couple months ago that I said that the person in question treats this thread like his personal fiefdom. I still stand by that comment and generally skip over those comments. I recommend that you do the same.

Originally Posted by GG06MR
Nice. How can you discount my position on the matter as opinion when you still haven't come up with one real life example that suggests I'm wrong? Nobody cares about the strategy of a struggling Ferrari, or a Lotus Renault with no realistic chance at the championship either. First and foremost you need to have a car capable of winning the championship, and then of course at least one driver capable of winning races too. Every championship winner in recent history fits that, AND they've also all had a clear #2 driver receiving at the very least, less attention and focus on their needs to maximize their results compared to the #1 driver, and in many cases lesser equipment to some degree. So....for the third time, give me an example where equal cars and equal drivers has resulted in a championship. Until then, opinions are like A-holes only applies to YOU.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 12:20 PM
  #365  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by GG06MR
So....for the third time, give me an example where equal cars and equal drivers has resulted in a championship....
Senna and Prost, no?

l8r)
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 01:09 PM
  #366  
Crester's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 700
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Senna and Prost is a good example... but I think really having equal team mates fighting is not that common.

It's not always down to team orders... a lot of times one driver is legitimately faster than the other... or more consistent.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #367  
GG06MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 5
From: SATown
^^^^ That's what I'm talking about. Aside from the extremely rare case of a Senna/Prost combo, then you're always going to have one guy that outperforms the other, and in response receives more focus from the team to maximize their chances for victory. 2nd place is just first loser, even in F1 where they celebrate 2nd and even 3rd nearly as much as 1st.

And.....thanks for the advice Samson. I think that's very likely the best approach.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 02:47 AM
  #368  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
^Gone over to the dark side have we...I answered UR question and yet now we turn the other cheek approach...I thought Sauber getting a podium would have an effect on U...just didn't realize how much...but thats the way it goes.

Later, Ken

Last edited by KPerez; Mar 29, 2012 at 03:20 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 03:56 AM
  #369  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Hey Montezemelo, Listen up

Recall when Massa was having a bad time last year, chief blow hard at Ferrari, Montezemelo, instead of supporting Massa claimed that Massa's twin was driving the car rather than Massa himself...nice words of support! Well this year amid the howls to axe Massa after two races, at least someone in Ferrari is doing the right thing....this from team boss, Dominicalli: "Felipe has changed his plans and, instead of heading home to see his family in Brazil, he will be in Maranello tomorrow to work alongside the engineers to calmly analyse everything that happened in these past two races, trying to identify why he was not able to deliver what he is capable of...That's the right spirit and we are here, ready to help him." I hope and trust Montezemelo can recognize that one of their employees is able to provide the right kind of encouragement to one of their drivers currently not having " a good day".

Later, Ken
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 09:47 AM
  #370  
GG06MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 5
From: SATown
Originally Posted by KPerez
^Gone over to the dark side have we...I answered UR question and yet now we turn the other cheek approach...I thought Sauber getting a podium would have an effect on U...just didn't realize how much...but thats the way it goes.

Later, Ken
LOL. Sauber getting on the podium isn't what's annoyed me.

I said it before it happened, and I'll say it again, the only way they get there is in a fluke rain/weather related race. Until they do it in the dry, then this Sauber business is still just a farce to me.

Oh, and yes, thank you for finally answering my challenging question. You found an instance where once in the last 13 years your ideal strategy of equal cars and equal treatment resulted in a championship. Good job. Now your opinion is no longer like an A-hole.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 09:51 AM
  #371  
GG06MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 5
From: SATown
Originally Posted by KPerez
Recall when Massa was having a bad time last year, chief blow hard at Ferrari, Montezemelo, instead of supporting Massa claimed that Massa's twin was driving the car rather than Massa himself...nice words of support! Well this year amid the howls to axe Massa after two races, at least someone in Ferrari is doing the right thing....this from team boss, Dominicalli: "Felipe has changed his plans and, instead of heading home to see his family in Brazil, he will be in Maranello tomorrow to work alongside the engineers to calmly analyse everything that happened in these past two races, trying to identify why he was not able to deliver what he is capable of...That's the right spirit and we are here, ready to help him." I hope and trust Montezemelo can recognize that one of their employees is able to provide the right kind of encouragement to one of their drivers currently not having " a good day".

Later, Ken
Sorry, but the kid is beyond any level of encouragement at this point. Unfortunately for him, his days are numbered.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 09:59 AM
  #372  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
I'm guessing Massa has China and Bahrain to prove himself. After that, if he doesn't get results, then with the test coming up at Mugello, I'd wager that someone else will be driving instead of Felipe. Hate to see it happen to a nice guy like him, but right now all he's proving is that nice guys _do_ finish last. IMO if he'd been more hardcore in '08, he'd have had the championship.

l8r)
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 10:55 AM
  #373  
DaWorstPlaya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 7
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by SamsonEvoX
I still stand by that comment and generally skip over those comments. I recommend that you do the same.
Now why would you go ahead and say something like that? It's the back and forth banter that keeps the rest of us interested in this thread. If everyone just agreed with everyone else on this forum, this thread would get boring really quickly.

Carry on gents. ....

One thing we can all deduce for now, is that Sauber's car is the fastest in the wet, for sure!

Last edited by DaWorstPlaya; Mar 29, 2012 at 10:58 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 11:08 AM
  #374  
honda-guy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 37
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by DaWorstPlaya
N
One thing we can all deduce for now, is that Sauber's car is the fastest in the wet, for sure!
Tru dat
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #375  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by DaWorstPlaya
Now why would you go ahead and say something like that? It's the back and forth banter that keeps the rest of us interested in this thread. If everyone just agreed with everyone else on this forum, this thread would get boring really quickly.

Carry on gents. ....

One thing we can all deduce for now, is that Sauber's car is the fastest in the wet, for sure!
At least when "Checo" is driving it.

I hate to say it, but as much as I like watching Kobayashi, I think Perez has his number and is going to be a faster overall driver.

l8r)
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 PM.