Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Sup w/them 2026 Spring Projects?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2023 | 05:31 PM
  #5506  
RallySport9's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 217
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Ayoustin
You are more than welcome to keep the balance shafts in your engine, they have their place especially if the car is just a daily driver, but don't go spreading false information and telling people blatantly wrong information by saying that they will damage their engine by removing the balance shafts.
You make valid and true points, and for a car not doing many miles/track, drag only. I myself would feel comfortable driving without them. I'm not saying it's gona destroy your car immediately. I just don't believe it's false to say that secondary vibrations cause other long term issues. How is that possible? If the vibration is enough to back out bolts, that's pretty significant.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2023 | 05:55 PM
  #5507  
Spooled_IX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 199
Likes: 64
From: San Diego, CA
I just picked up a used Tanabe 2.75" DP, Ultimate Racing 3" HFC and a AEM X-series WB. The car already has a Blitz FMIC, Nisei LICP and HKS Super Turbo CBE and I need to find a way to get a Grimmspeed 3-port BCS and OmniPower 3-bar MAP sensor to CA so I can start tuning it. I'm sort of following an FQ360+ build sheet so I'm hoping to get about 300whp/300wtq on 91 with all of these mods. I've driven a stock Evo 9 for 2 and a half years and it's time for some more power and response. You guys think this is doable on 91 and stock injectors?

Last edited by Spooled_IX; Aug 9, 2023 at 09:36 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2023 | 07:30 PM
  #5508  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by RallySport9
You make valid and true points, and for a car not doing many miles/track, drag only. I myself would feel comfortable driving without them. I'm not saying it's gona destroy your car immediately. I just don't believe it's false to say that secondary vibrations cause other long term issues. How is that possible? If the vibration is enough to back out bolts, that's pretty significant.
You only need the right frequency to back out a bolt. Doesn't have to be severe.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2023 | 09:33 AM
  #5509  
Construct's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 161
From: Utah
Originally Posted by Spooled_IX
I just picked up a used Tanabe 2.75" DP, Ultimate Racing 3" HFC and a AEM X-series WB. The car already has a Blitz FMIC, Nisei LICP and HKS Super Turbo CBE and I need to find a way to get a Grimmspeed 3-port BCS and OmniPower 3-bar MAP sensor to CA so I can start tuning it(CA bans sales of certain motorsports products that are deemed to violate smog laws). I'm sort of following an FQ360+ build sheet so I'm hoping to get about 300whp/300wtq on 91 with all of these mods. I've driven a stock Evo 9 for 2 and a half years and it's time for some more power and response. You guys think this is doable on 91 and stock injectors?
300whp on stock injectors and 91 octane around sea level shouldn't be a problem. People have posted dyno sheets with even higher numbers from different dynos.

I'd recommend not aiming too aggressively for specific numbers. See what you get and then back off a little bit for some added safety margin. These cars are fun with the stock turbo uncorked.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2023 | 10:52 AM
  #5510  
ViciousLSD's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 600
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Construct
These cars are fun with the stock turbo uncorked.
I wish that was my experience
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 12:28 PM
  #5511  
Bee-Raddd's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 276
From: New Zealand
has anybody toyed around with upgrading to 1/2 head studs rather than going down the o ring route? or if youve gone down the o ring route have any of you done the head side rather than the block side?

If you have L19 studs how far have you pushed them?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 12:43 PM
  #5512  
TimC909's Avatar
Evolving Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 140
Likes: 18
From: Lancashire, UK
What HG are you using now? I quite like the look of the SCE Vulcan Cut-Ring gasket but not seen much feedback from it on the 4G63.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 02:50 PM
  #5513  
Dallas J's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,969
Likes: 811
From: Portland, Or
Isn’t there issues to be solved with the deck being not stiff enough to tolerate more torque from bigger head studs?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 03:15 PM
  #5514  
Bee-Raddd's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 276
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by TimC909
What HG are you using now? I quite like the look of the SCE Vulcan Cut-Ring gasket but not seen much feedback from it on the 4G63.
Ive always just stuck to stock HG to be honest. seen theres some fancy ones around. heaps of options now which is why im stewing over what to do while the head is off

Originally Posted by Dallas J
Isn’t there issues to be solved with the deck being not stiff enough to tolerate more torque from bigger head studs?
You can buy shouldered dowels now and have them installed which allows you to torque down more. This is another option even on standard head stud diameter.
As i understand it the main issue is generally the boost level presses into the head and the material around the nut/washer compresses causing the head to lift off the block.

https://www.tmzperformance.com/shop/...ldered-dowels/
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 07:33 PM
  #5515  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Bee-Raddd
has anybody toyed around with upgrading to 1/2 head studs rather than going down the o ring route? or if youve gone down the o ring route have any of you done the head side rather than the block side?

If you have L19 studs how far have you pushed them?
Just oring it. 1/2" head studs are a headache for 1000whp+

Block or head, take your pick. It's all works well. L19's torqued to 100ftlbs with the oversized nut and .9" washers and oring will hold a lot.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 11:28 PM
  #5516  
Ayoustin's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,989
Likes: 648
From: SC
Originally Posted by Bee-Raddd
has anybody toyed around with upgrading to 1/2 head studs rather than going down the o ring route? or if youve gone down the o ring route have any of you done the head side rather than the block side?

If you have L19 studs how far have you pushed them?
Oversized head studs aren't worth the effort. Grab some 625+ studs and call it a day. With o-rings those will hold 1000+.

I generally avoid L19 just because of how corrosion prone the material is. It's a fairly exotic tool steel and when tool steels like it corrode they form weak points in the corrosion and the material doesn't stretch, it snaps.


Originally Posted by Dallas J
Isn’t there issues to be solved with the deck being not stiff enough to tolerate more torque from bigger head studs?
Depends on who you talk to. The deck on a 4G block isn't crazy thick but still thicker than most. But clamping force is clamping force, whether you get it from stronger materials or larger fasteners, they both deform the deck after a certain point. The bigger issue than block deck thickness is how deep, or not deep, the studs thread into the block. The threads aren't that far below the surface of the deck which forces the deck to deform more easily. If you look at most modern engines the fastener threads for the head fasteners are a good 4-6" below the surface of the deck and aftermarket head studs are like twice as long as 4G head studs. This is where being an iron block is advantageous because it'd be far worse if the threads were this close to the deck in an aluminum block but the principles still apply. Unfortunately I don't think the head fastener threads can be made any lower in the block without breaking into the crankcase.

I recall watching an HPA interview with an engineer who was involved with RX cars that were 4G powered and were making some insane torque at lower RPM and the only way they could keep the deck of the block from flexing was basically adding a thicker deck plate between the block and head.

Edit: here it is


Last edited by Ayoustin; Aug 7, 2023 at 08:14 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2023 | 12:14 PM
  #5517  
Bee-Raddd's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 276
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by LetsGetThisDone
Just oring it. 1/2" head studs are a headache for 1000whp+

Block or head, take your pick. It's all works well. L19's torqued to 100ftlbs with the oversized nut and .9" washers and oring will hold a lot.
Are the oversized nut's the ones that come with the L19s or is that another upgrade? I guess the question is do i need to o ring if i have the L19 studs. i only want to make max like mid 30psi boost for short periods of time.

Originally Posted by Ayoustin
Oversized head studs aren't worth the effort. Grab some 625+ studs and call it a day. With o-rings those will hold 1000+.

I generally avoid L19 just because of how corrosion prone the material is. It's a fairly exotic tool steel and when tool steels like it corrode they form weak points in the corrosion and the material doesn't stretch, it snaps.




Depends on who you talk to. The deck on a 4G block isn't crazy thick but still thicker than most. But clamping force is clamping force, whether you get it from stronger materials or larger fasteners, they both deform the deck after a certain point. The bigger issue than block deck thickness is how deep, or not deep, the studs thread into the block. The threads aren't that far below the surface of the deck which forces the deck to deform more easily. If you look at most modern engines the fastener threads for the head fasteners are a good 4-6" below the surface of the deck and aftermarket head studs are like twice as long as 4G head studs. This is where being an iron block is advantageous because it'd be far worse if the threads were this close to the deck in an aluminum block but the principles still apply. Unfortunately I don't think the head fastener threads can be made any lower in the block without breaking into the crankcase.

I recall watching an HPA interview with an engineer who was involved with RX cars that were 4G powered and were making some insane torque at lower RPM and the only way they could keep the deck of the block from flexing was basically adding a thicker deck plate between the block and head.

Edit: here it is

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3wGe...ormanceAcademy
Yea maybe i should be looking into uprated head gaskets to go with the L19 studs i already have rather than using the factory gasket.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2023 | 05:13 AM
  #5518  
dr_latino999's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 18
From: Central TX
Originally Posted by RallySport9
You make valid and true points, and for a car not doing many miles/track, drag only. I myself would feel comfortable driving without them. I'm not saying it's gona destroy your car immediately. I just don't believe it's false to say that secondary vibrations cause other long term issues. How is that possible? If the vibration is enough to back out bolts, that's pretty significant.
Define not many miles on the subjective clause? I'm on a decade here of daily driving, from cross country American road trips, to enjoying the German autobahn network, and tourist days at the ring. I think I've put my drivetrain through almost every scenario short of artic winters.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2023 | 08:37 AM
  #5519  
ViciousLSD's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 600
From: Houston
summer project ugh
sadly, i got forced into rebuilding my current motor a bit too early, was planning it until after that nats. so this is the buschur 2.0 short block package, built 2019, didnt race during the pandemic, so I got 1.5years of autox + 2 lite time attack days *sigh*. oil pump was new, changed brad penn oil frequently and it doesnt smell e85. i got a spun #4 rod bearing... is 8200rpm rev limit the culprit here?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2023 | 08:55 AM
  #5520  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
No, the #4 rod is the last to get oil. Likely a starvation issue. Post pics of all the bearings. I'm sure the others show evidence of starvation as well.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:02 PM.