Outlander Sport Mods
nice was waiting for this, im just looking at the price $53.99, should i just wait for a short ram intake kit, i mean im am dying to replace the diaper of an air filter they gave us from factory. what do you guys think.
Evolved Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 27
From: Out towards the countryside of Dallas, TX (USA)
Considering we've waited THIS Long for a K&N filter... I'm sure you can wait a bit longer and save a few pennies more to get a CAI.
i just like the room under the hood the CAI gave and the loud sucking sound lol! As far as a big difference in a CAI and a K&N air filter not sure on the dyno results but they cant be far off. It really is the difference in appearance and money that you are looking to spend.
Anybody use this brand of TB on an O.S.??? Or the boomba 75mm?
Not sure how the 75mm TB ones would work with an AN motor. I used the 75 mm on my Evo 9 and itworked great. Did not know it is over kill.
I know the Evo X are 64mm and work great.
does anyone know if the Ralliart are 64mm as well?
Thanks
Not sure how the 75mm TB ones would work with an AN motor. I used the 75 mm on my Evo 9 and itworked great. Did not know it is over kill.
I know the Evo X are 64mm and work great.
does anyone know if the Ralliart are 64mm as well?
Thanks
I got my K&N Filter today and I swapped the old DIAPER filter out. Hopefully I will see some MPG increases. It was a bit of a PITA to get the new filter in but I got it. I also did a negative battery terminal unplug to start a NEW TEACH IN so the ECU can learn the new filter and its increased flow.
i have a 2013 RVR with the NEW AIR BOX
i have a 2013 RVR with the NEW AIR BOX
i contacted the seller on this item the black TB is 75mm and he said the blue one i emailed him about is 65mm, i am not sure what size the silver TB is though. I think 65mm would be perfect for what i have done to my O.S., but i would really prefer the OEM EVO X TB it is 65mm.
Anybody use this brand of TB on an O.S.??? Or the boomba 75mm?
Not sure how the 75mm TB ones would work with an AN motor. I used the 75 mm on my Evo 9 and itworked great. Did not know it is over kill.
I know the Evo X are 64mm and work great.
does anyone know if the Ralliart are 64mm as well?
Thanks
Not sure how the 75mm TB ones would work with an AN motor. I used the 75 mm on my Evo 9 and itworked great. Did not know it is over kill.
I know the Evo X are 64mm and work great.
does anyone know if the Ralliart are 64mm as well?
Thanks
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2008-2014-Mitsubishi-Evolution-X-EVO-10-Carbon-Fiber-Front-Grille-Grill-Cover-j7-/151318234118?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&fits=Model%3ALancer&hash=item233b450406&vxp=mtr#ht_2888wt_1124
i am sure we have discussed this before, but does anyone have an EVO X or a Lancer that we can meassure the front bumper insert to see if you can use this add on EVO X style front CF bumper insert.
going to see if anyone on here can give us measurements of an EVO X front bar.
Thanks so much!
finger X'ed, but not holding my breath
i am sure we have discussed this before, but does anyone have an EVO X or a Lancer that we can meassure the front bumper insert to see if you can use this add on EVO X style front CF bumper insert.
going to see if anyone on here can give us measurements of an EVO X front bar.
Thanks so much!
finger X'ed, but not holding my breath
We have a '14 lancer, so not sure of the grille insert is the exact same but here ya go, I can take pics of the differences if you'd like.
Lancer: 31" x 33.5" x 6"
OS (inside chrome): 28" x 32.5" x 6"
OS (chrome removes/cut): 29" x 33.5" x 6"
The OS is also beveled on top and bottom, whereas the Lancer is only beveled on the bottom and has a flat top for the chrome surround.
Might work if your Frankenstein it though.
Lancer: 31" x 33.5" x 6"
OS (inside chrome): 28" x 32.5" x 6"
OS (chrome removes/cut): 29" x 33.5" x 6"
The OS is also beveled on top and bottom, whereas the Lancer is only beveled on the bottom and has a flat top for the chrome surround.
Might work if your Frankenstein it though.
Awesome thanks so much. Looks like a fiber glass one would be the way to go and chop an 1" off each side...
Gatsby;11298464]We have a '14 lancer, so not sure of the grille insert is the exact same but here ya go, I can take pics of the differences if you'd like.
Lancer: 31" x 33.5" x 6"
OS (inside chrome): 28" x 32.5" x 6"
OS (chrome removes/cut): 29" x 33.5" x 6"
Aweaome
The OS is also beveled on top and bottom, whereas the Lancer is only beveled on the bottom and has a flat top for the chrome surround.
Might work if your Frankenstein it though.[/QUOTE]
Gatsby;11298464]We have a '14 lancer, so not sure of the grille insert is the exact same but here ya go, I can take pics of the differences if you'd like.
Lancer: 31" x 33.5" x 6"
OS (inside chrome): 28" x 32.5" x 6"
OS (chrome removes/cut): 29" x 33.5" x 6"
Aweaome
The OS is also beveled on top and bottom, whereas the Lancer is only beveled on the bottom and has a flat top for the chrome surround.
Might work if your Frankenstein it though.[/QUOTE]
Evolved Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 27
From: Out towards the countryside of Dallas, TX (USA)
^
Had to look that stuff up.. Interesting tape. It's a tad pricey.
Does it really work as claimed - reduce heat penetration?
>> Perhaps tape up the underside/inner-surface of the items (intake cover, sparkplug cover, etc) if you don't want to get too Bling-out.
Had to look that stuff up.. Interesting tape. It's a tad pricey.
Does it really work as claimed - reduce heat penetration?
>> Perhaps tape up the underside/inner-surface of the items (intake cover, sparkplug cover, etc) if you don't want to get too Bling-out.
Last edited by mRVRsport; Sep 11, 2014 at 06:37 PM.


