Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo 8 Stock block FP black - 402 HP 318 TQ - 29 psi - Buschur Tuned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2017 | 09:58 PM
  #1  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Evo 8 Stock block FP black - 402 HP 318 TQ - 29 psi - Buschur Tuned

After 4 years of owning my Evo, it has finally been tuned, and I honestly wish I would have done it sooner, even when it was on the stock 9 turbo.

93 octane
Stock block
Stock head with supertech valves,
Kelford 272 cams and Kelford springs
Walbro 255
FIC 1050cc injectors
Wate​​​​​​r/Meth injection, not used for the tune
JB FP black SS housing
STM short route UICP and small battery
ETS intercooler
TurboXS HP boost controller
Tial BOV and Wastegate
STM downpipe for FP turbos
Buschur Racing exhaust and compressor outlet


Car feels great on the street, it might be a bit laggier than some would like, but I don't mind it and still think the car is a blast to drive, especially with the tephra no lift.

Previous best at the track with the 9 turbo and a stock tune I modified to work with my car was 12.33@109. I'm fairly certain I will see 11s my first pass, and I'm hoping to be consistent mid 11s by the end of the summer.

Next step is to save up for a Buschur block and go for more power. Original plan was for a 2.0 LR, but Dave might have me talked into a 2.3. Thanks to David Buschur for the solid tune, and the guys at Buschur Racing that I talked to before and after the tune. I will definitely be going back for another tune when the time comes.
Attached Thumbnails Evo 8 Stock block FP black - 402 HP 318 TQ - 29 psi - Buschur Tuned-20170406_111721.jpg  

Last edited by 740 Turbo Brick; Apr 9, 2017 at 10:10 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2017 | 10:28 PM
  #2  
dookgvr4's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 13
From: Syracuse N.Y.
Looks fun

-edit-

Curious how these numbers would translate to "virtual Dyno"

Last edited by dookgvr4; Apr 9, 2017 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 03:05 AM
  #3  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
I was curious of this myself, both on mustang and dynojet settings. I'm going to check that out this week. Not sure why my graph pic showed up sideways though..
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 04:30 AM
  #4  
MaLo EvoVIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: SFL
Originally Posted by 740 Turbo Brick
Next step is to save up for a Buschur block and go for more power. Original plan was for a 2.0 LR, but Dave might have me talked into a 2.3.
2.3 or 2.3 RPM?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 06:28 AM
  #5  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
He didn't specify, if I do go 2.3 it will probably just be the standard one. I don't expect to need more than 8500 rpm
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 07:48 AM
  #6  
lancerrally45's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 21
From: MI
Stock block, fp black, 400hp....What am I missing? Am I being punked? Wheres the power?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 07:53 AM
  #7  
ronaldo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 809
Likes: 26
From: New Jersey
Nice ride and numbers. Interested in the new times you'll put down on the new setup.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 08:53 AM
  #8  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by ronaldo9
Nice ride and numbers. Interested in the new times you'll put down on the new setup.
Thanks! I am very much looking forward to hitting the track this year. From what I've read and numbers I've seen off the BR dyno and track times to back it up, I should see 11s fairly easy, then just a matter of how far I can go into the 11s
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 08:56 AM
  #9  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by lancerrally45
Stock block, fp black, 400hp....What am I missing? Am I being punked? Wheres the power?
Are you familiar with Buschurs Mustang dyno? I'm not trying to impress anyone with huge stock block numbers. I wanted a fun car with a turbo to grow on, and I have just that.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 09:48 AM
  #10  
lancerrally45's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 21
From: MI
Originally Posted by 740 Turbo Brick
Are you familiar with Buschurs Mustang dyno? I'm not trying to impress anyone with huge stock block numbers. I wanted a fun car with a turbo to grow on, and I have just that.
Adding in an extra 12% shoots it up to around ~450 hp. Still low for a black with cams. They must have thrown more timing at it Im assuming. If you can put up with the lag, kudos to you.
If their dyno is off more then that, they should fix their ****. They should be able to afford it since now all they do is GTR crap.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 12:17 PM
  #11  
ronaldo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 809
Likes: 26
From: New Jersey
What clutch are you using by the way?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 12:36 PM
  #12  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by ronaldo9
What clutch are you using by the way?
ACT XTSS. Has about 3 years, 13k miles, and at least 60 launches on it. Still holding great.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 02:04 PM
  #13  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Originally Posted by lancerrally45
Adding in an extra 12% shoots it up to around ~450 hp. Still low for a black with cams. They must have thrown more timing at it Im assuming. If you can put up with the lag, kudos to you.
If their dyno is off more then that, they should fix their ****. They should be able to afford it since now all they do is GTR crap.
Buschur has explained time and time again that it is setup exactly the way Mustang set it up to begin with, what difference does it make to you what numbers it puts out anyway? I've seen a local mustang dyno read higher than any dynojet. A dyno is a tool, plain and simple. It works as intended.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 03:20 PM
  #14  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by evo8426
Buschur has explained time and time again that it is setup exactly the way Mustang set it up to begin with, what difference does it make to you what numbers it puts out anyway? I've seen a local mustang dyno read higher than any dynojet. A dyno is a tool, plain and simple. It works as intended.
This is what I've come to realize as well. It's fun to compare numbers, but you can't get a real apples to apples unless you have 2 cars on the same dyno on the same day. Other than that, compare trap speeds race from a 40 roll. Regardless, the only other time this car was on Buschurs dyno was at the shootout 2 years ago, with a **** poor email tune that made 230/262, cutting out at 6k rpm. Over 100 HP gain, it feels like a new car to me
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2017 | 05:15 PM
  #15  
Bhsj13's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 26
From: United States
grats! im sure its fun. if buschur tuned it, then its fine.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:31 PM.