Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo 8 Stock block FP black - 402 HP 318 TQ - 29 psi - Buschur Tuned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2017 | 09:16 AM
  #31  
butte's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 175
Likes: 8
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by lancerrally45
Because I dont rely on other people to do my work for me? Yes, forgive me for not giving someone $300-$700 for a dyno tune.
Are you really taking the time to grief someone for getting a professional tune? It's time to stop posting and go outside
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2017 | 05:40 PM
  #32  
RS200's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 118
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Seems pretty laggy...wouldn't a Red, or maybe Green give the same result but wake up before 5000?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2017 | 09:07 AM
  #33  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Black makes more power boost to boost. So, no. Again, Buschur's mustang reads low.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2017 | 03:42 PM
  #34  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by butte
Are you really taking the time to grief someone for getting a professional tune? It's time to stop posting and go outside
Thank you
Originally Posted by RS200
Seems pretty laggy...wouldn't a Red, or maybe Green give the same result but wake up before 5000?
It is fairly laggy, I don't mind it though. In hindsight a Red probably would have been a better choice but I don't regret the black

Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Black makes more power boost to boost. So, no. Again, Buschur's mustang reads low.
Does it read low even compared to other mustang dynos? I know dynojet numbers are usually higher regardless
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2017 | 04:49 PM
  #35  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
For the answer to that, you would have to ask David. It definitely reads the typical 10-12% lower than a dynojet though.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2017 | 09:00 PM
  #36  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Scott's stock engine evo I tuned made 630whp 485wtq on his dyno on lower boost at 2012 shootout and that was around 710-720 in VD. It reads around 13% lower then a dynojet based on a bunch of cars we compared it with. We did a comparison right off the dyno on Nick's car also the year it won the stock appearing turbo competition. It was within 13% as well.

Last edited by tscompusa; Apr 19, 2017 at 09:32 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 06:26 AM
  #37  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by tscompusa
Scott's stock engine evo I tuned made 630whp 485wtq on his dyno on lower boost at 2012 shootout and that was around 710-720 in VD. It reads around 13% lower then a dynojet based on a bunch of cars we compared it with. We did a comparison right off the dyno on Nick's car also the year it won the stock appearing turbo competition. It was within 13% as well.
Thanks for the info. And holy torque, that's crazy. Obviously that's pushing the limit, but I'm having a hard time deciding on going for more power on the stock engine and just enjoying it, or getting a built engine and going for 600 or so.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 08:23 AM
  #38  
IzzyRS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 818
Likes: 22
From: Us
Originally Posted by 740 Turbo Brick
Thanks for the info. And holy torque, that's crazy. Obviously that's pushing the limit, but I'm having a hard time deciding on going for more power on the stock engine and just enjoying it, or getting a built engine and going for 600 or so.
Built engine is the answer!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 04:22 PM
  #39  
evo8vz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 285
Likes: 12
From: Italy Venezia
Originally Posted by lancerrally45
Adding in an extra 12% shoots it up to around ~450 hp. Still low for a black with cams. They must have thrown more timing at it Im assuming. If you can put up with the lag, kudos to you.
If their dyno is off more then that, they should fix their ****. They should be able to afford it since now all they do is GTR crap.

How retarded is this...

I would love to have 450 whp and 360ish torque on a stock block car.

Its good enough to run low 11s or high 10s on pump with a good driver.

Give it E85 and she will be making over 500 whp all day long.

Ignore the haters to the op. I could give a crap less about vd numbers and more about what the car does at the track or streets.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2017 | 11:16 PM
  #40  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by evo8vz
How retarded is this...

I would love to have 450 whp and 360ish torque on a stock block car.

Its good enough to run low 11s or high 10s on pump with a good driver.

Give it E85 and she will be making over 500 whp all day long.

Ignore the haters to the op. I could give a crap less about vd numbers and more about what the car does at the track or streets.
Thank you, and it feels great on the street, hope to have track numbers soon. But I may need a new clutch disc soon, I did a test hit after adjusting my 2 step and I got a lot more slip than I did in previous years...
Originally Posted by apple94
Great car!!
Thank you!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2017 | 07:37 AM
  #41  
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 66
From: connecticut
Nice setup , enjoy your car and down the road when you get your engine built you will see the potential of the fp black when you push it a little more!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2017 | 05:30 PM
  #42  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
Originally Posted by ctfpevoVIII
Nice setup , enjoy your car and down the road when you get your engine built you will see the potential of the fp black when you push it a little more!
Thank you, and that was exactly my thoughts, I can use this turbo on stock engine, and when I get the built engine it just needs more timing and boost thrown at it. I see a lot of people running 35-38 psi on it
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 06:59 AM
  #43  
740 Turbo Brick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 6
From: Ashtabula Ohio
I finally made it to the track last night, and it was one of the best nights I've had going down the strip in a long time. Car ran great, got 3 runs in, all over 120 mph traps. 11.56, 11.41 and 11.43 with 1.68 to 1.69 60 ft on all of them. Car feels super consistent.

Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 09:50 AM
  #44  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
YAS, time slips. Car is definitely faster than you're dyno sheet would indicate. As I figured it would be LOL.
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 09:53 AM
  #45  
ronaldo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 809
Likes: 26
From: New Jersey
1.68 60ft wow. Was this on street tires?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:54 PM.