Visnu Colorado Dyno Day
The altitude is desirable from the tuner's standpoint. It permits the development of mapping that covers different locales as well as fuel quality.
--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
Originally posted by DynoKing
Also I want to know if any of the dumbass DMS fools tried to kick Shiv's ***. I wish they would try that **** on me.
Also I want to know if any of the dumbass DMS fools tried to kick Shiv's ***. I wish they would try that **** on me.
--Dave
Originally posted by chronohunter
Stage 1+ was at 340hp/ 360lbft SAE corrected. You run out of turbo real quick at altitude
all on 91oct. Dyno charts to follow...
Stage 1+ was at 340hp/ 360lbft SAE corrected. You run out of turbo real quick at altitude
all on 91oct. Dyno charts to follow...
I knew it great #s!! Makes sea level guys like me
I knew this setup is putting out some great power!! What was you final cam gear setting?
Doggin Shiv
You can say anything you want about Shiv, but personally I thought he and Bret handled themselves very professionally. If there were disparaging comments made, I didnt hear them.
I do find it somewhat interesting that a couple of the guys with the Super AFCs and boost controller route were making damn close to the same amount of horsepower as the piggybacks though.
The dynos here at altitude do pressure/temperature correction which estimates the power at sea level. The dyno at MAC is approximately 6000' ASL and they take that into account when doing their corrected horsepower numbers.
Landry, good to see your ride laying down the crazy numbers. What was it, 493whp?
J
I do find it somewhat interesting that a couple of the guys with the Super AFCs and boost controller route were making damn close to the same amount of horsepower as the piggybacks though.
The dynos here at altitude do pressure/temperature correction which estimates the power at sea level. The dyno at MAC is approximately 6000' ASL and they take that into account when doing their corrected horsepower numbers.
Landry, good to see your ride laying down the crazy numbers. What was it, 493whp?
J
Re: Doggin Shiv
Originally posted by JaMa
You can say anything you want about Shiv, but personally I thought he and Bret handled themselves very professionally. If there were disparaging comments made, I didnt hear them.
I do find it somewhat interesting that a couple of the guys with the Super AFCs and boost controller route were making damn close to the same amount of horsepower as the piggybacks though.
The dynos here at altitude do pressure/temperature correction which estimates the power at sea level. The dyno at MAC is approximately 6000' ASL and they take that into account when doing their corrected horsepower numbers.
Landry, good to see your ride laying down the crazy numbers. What was it, 493whp?
J
You can say anything you want about Shiv, but personally I thought he and Bret handled themselves very professionally. If there were disparaging comments made, I didnt hear them.
I do find it somewhat interesting that a couple of the guys with the Super AFCs and boost controller route were making damn close to the same amount of horsepower as the piggybacks though.
The dynos here at altitude do pressure/temperature correction which estimates the power at sea level. The dyno at MAC is approximately 6000' ASL and they take that into account when doing their corrected horsepower numbers.
Landry, good to see your ride laying down the crazy numbers. What was it, 493whp?
J
Re: Doggin Shiv
Originally posted by JaMa
You can say anything you want about Shiv, but personally I thought he and Bret handled themselves very professionally. If there were disparaging comments made, I didnt hear them.
I do find it somewhat interesting that a couple of the guys with the Super AFCs and boost controller route were making damn close to the same amount of horsepower as the piggybacks though.
The dynos here at altitude do pressure/temperature correction which estimates the power at sea level. The dyno at MAC is approximately 6000' ASL and they take that into account when doing their corrected horsepower numbers.
Landry, good to see your ride laying down the crazy numbers. What was it, 493whp?
J
You can say anything you want about Shiv, but personally I thought he and Bret handled themselves very professionally. If there were disparaging comments made, I didnt hear them.
I do find it somewhat interesting that a couple of the guys with the Super AFCs and boost controller route were making damn close to the same amount of horsepower as the piggybacks though.
The dynos here at altitude do pressure/temperature correction which estimates the power at sea level. The dyno at MAC is approximately 6000' ASL and they take that into account when doing their corrected horsepower numbers.
Landry, good to see your ride laying down the crazy numbers. What was it, 493whp?
J
I must have missed the cars with the S-AFC's. When were those and what numbers did they put down?
--Dave
Guy from the Springs
Well, there was a guy from CO Springs there running 20PSI an EBC, a SAFC2 and an exhaust system with a cat putting down ~320whp corrected. Thats not too bad considering he was running canned settings and not much more boost than stock. He was the one in the slammed red evo with the gauges on the steering column.
There's no argument that piggyback control is probably better over all, but thats sure good bang for the $$$.
J
There's no argument that piggyback control is probably better over all, but thats sure good bang for the $$$.
J
Last edited by JaMa; Dec 21, 2003 at 09:41 PM.


