The "Backpressure" issue is a myth. You own a Turbocharged car...best exhaust is NO EXHAUST.

 

I ran a 13.9 at 100 with a 2.2 60.........


of course these where all bad launches on heavy 18 wheels, as it was my first time with the evo...

Can we see some traps from some of you stock guys....

 

Mathematically looking at this now, the times seem wrong. Seems going at that speed from the 1/8 to the 1/4 there would be less elapsed time. Of coarse, my other three slips show a final mph of around 105 mph. Something in the equation is not right.[/QUOTE]



Speed world was having some MPH reading issues, I ran a 12.66 @ 108 about 3 weeks ago then recently went 12.60 @42.68 Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I wish LoL

 

Karma trapped 106 at Firebird which is typically a slower track.

 

At this point I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the time slips are completly erroneus. Nothings adds up.

You don't have sufficient mods to trap that kind of speed

Please feel free to express yourself, I am not saying you are a bad driver, I just truly believe your runs are not accurate at all, perhaps the speed/timer device was faulty at the time.

Typically speaking a car that traps 118MPH should have some serious power, your car don't have sufficient mods to propell your car to such great speeds.
Could you tell me on what dyno did you make the 340WHP?

Thanks


You(Speedworld Racetrack, Phoenix)


2.085
5.596
8.533 mph (91.848)
11.008
13.214 mph (118.310)


Me (Firebird racetrack,Phoenix)

R/T .068
60' 1.724
330 5.032
1/8 7.793 @88.93
1000 10.195
1/4 mile 12.226@111.43

My .02c

Carlos

 

That's what I was saying. All the other runs were in the 105mph range. Something was up with that timeslip. At this point, I'm getting better 60fts out of the supra, it's just a matter of adjustment to the awd. The 340 was on a dynojet. Appreciate your thoughts.

 

I dont have my timeslip handy but I ran at Firebird 101@13.6

It might have been 102, but I doubt it