Results of DIY manifold P&P...
gtech~!!!!! he said he has a gtech. thats the 2nd time somebody told me he dont have a dyno, but he clearly said many times he has a gtech...sure they aint 100% accurate, but it gives more accuracy them some hot head idiot thinking he's pushing 200whp (like me- im that hot head idiot) lol
lol im gettin a gtech in a few weeks, theres no dynos aroundhere that do fwd cars, so im in the same boat as this guy,,, but the fact of the matter is this guy said he was posting gtech numbers, and he still didnt do it yet, i was just seeing whats up w/ it thats all... off my nuts
OK, finally got some runs with the G-Tech. Found out some things about the G-Tech that answers why it's notoriously inaccurate. One is that you need a VERY flat road and the unit must be facing perfectly forward otherwise vector readings will be off. All things considered, there's too many variables when operating these things. But, it's just a tool and I can at least see CHANGES in numbers so I know I'm doing something right. I highly doubt the numbers themselves are accurate but at least there's an improvement.
Bone stock RA automatic average 0-60mph: 9.23 sec
RA with mods to date 0-60mph: 8.15 sec
I know, I know the numbers suck! But I don't think you can take the numbers by themselves as accurate. The only thing I'm taking from this is that there has been a decrease in 0-60 times. For some reason I couldn't get the 1/4 mile times to work. Probably why these things were on sale and they have a new model out now! But there's the numbers, glean from it what you may!
Bone stock RA automatic average 0-60mph: 9.23 sec
RA with mods to date 0-60mph: 8.15 sec
I know, I know the numbers suck! But I don't think you can take the numbers by themselves as accurate. The only thing I'm taking from this is that there has been a decrease in 0-60 times. For some reason I couldn't get the 1/4 mile times to work. Probably why these things were on sale and they have a new model out now! But there's the numbers, glean from it what you may!
I wouldn't recommend buying one of the new model G-Techs, too much $$$ for what they are. They had these older models for sale for around $60. Check on the internet. Oh yeah, I also did a HP reading with the G-Tech. Are you ready for this? It said 110 hp. Hahaha! Yeah,right!! I dunno, maybe the newer models are more accurate but last time I checked they were over $200US !!
Originally Posted by bahamut
Don't underestimate a Crown Vic . . . have you seen a policeman run his car through the speed. Not many 4 bangers can compete, unless w/ a turbo.
http://www.nlectc.org/pdffiles/michigan.pdf
http://www.modernracer.com/features/...ctoriacop.html
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
I'm glad I need a turbo to beat those times. Remarkable acceleration times, huh?
No, I actually forgot to include myself in the wt of the car. I really wasn't expecting accurate readings anyway from a G-Tech. Some day I'll make it down to Tampa and get it dyno'd.
Originally Posted by CrazyCal
My next car will be a Tiburon or Cougar with a V6. That should be good for at least 175mph . Who needs a Z06??!!
Originally Posted by CrazyCal
I guess I'll just have to be blunt: A stock Ralliart does not have 160whp. You lose at least 8-12% thru the drivetrain AND a stock Ralliart will not do 140mph! Show me 1 legitimate article or testing. And you can't assume & estimate a car's speed when the needle goes off the dial, that much I learned in school. I don't want to spend any more time arguing this point. All my schooling and experience tell me NO!! Nuff said.
Killah, thanks! Maybe I'll try to find them sometime and get some tuning done.
Killah, thanks! Maybe I'll try to find them sometime and get some tuning done.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KevinD
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
33
Jan 16, 2017 01:19 PM
BadazzCR
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Aug 23, 2008 07:40 AM




