Notices

Cobb accessport vs ams stx300 package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2016 | 06:08 AM
  #1  
MacAtak's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 2
From: Long Island
Cobb accessport vs ams stx300 package

Hey guys,
I only plan on doing maybe some bolt on work and an ecu flash on my evo x fe. It currently is completely stock and my first upgrade would be to reprogram the ecu so it is running the right way. I researched two options for the ecu, the cobb accessport v3 and the ams performance package stx300. A cobb accessport video shows a gain of 35hp but no results on fuel economy increase or decrease. And the stx300 claims an additional gain of 60hp and allegedly fuel economy increase but again no specific data. ... Have any of you had any experience with either of these products and any resulting data both horsepower/fuel economy, or even any problems with them?

My goal is to get the car to run and breathe as effectively and efficiently as possible. If you guys have any other suggestions other than cobb and ams, i am open to hear your experiences. Thanks guys, I appreciate it.
Reply
Old May 3, 2016 | 09:31 PM
  #2  
xking's Avatar
Newbie
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 72
Likes: 1
From: Lindenhurst, NY
Currently running the STX300 on my FE, and I like it a lot. I can't say there's much of an increase in fuel economy. I'd say driving in boost is very addictive, and you'll see a decrease testing out the maps. You may see it if you baby the gas pedal, to which I'd tip my hat to you. There's a noticeable increase in thrust from 3.5k RPM, however, you will lose some of the FE responsiveness down low from 1-3k RPM. So it's a bit of a trade off. Overall, I like it. Ideally, it would be nice to make the power up top without sacrificing any of the grunt down low.
Reply
Old May 4, 2016 | 01:35 AM
  #3  
MR. EVO MR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: :noitacoL
Get pro tuned!
Reply
Old May 4, 2016 | 08:03 AM
  #4  
alsong2002's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: phoenix
go get open source
Reply
Old May 11, 2016 | 08:24 AM
  #5  
PracticalDriver's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: USA
just get a protune. I've seen an EVO GSR with the AMS STX300 tune and it performed very stockish on our local road course.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2016 | 09:15 AM
  #6  
Garrett114's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: South Abington Pa
I ran a 12.8 @105 in wife's 14 GSR full weight and no other mods with the STX300 tune
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2016 | 08:30 AM
  #7  
KVandy15's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 82
Likes: 3
From: Saint Paul, MN
You can get a pro tune for less than the cost of either package, you don't need to buy any hardware unless you plan to tune it yourself. In NYC you have a lot of options for pro tuners, here is one that's right in your hood. http://www.vinnytenracing.com/
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2016 | 10:01 AM
  #8  
Rado_93's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
I don't know why people are still preaching go with Cobb when they've all but stopped developing for the Evo platform. Open Source has long been the way to go.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Saudi
Cobb AccessPORT
3
Dec 13, 2019 04:05 AM
tiki240
Evo X General
9
Sep 4, 2015 01:37 AM
Gyroscope
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
45
Mar 27, 2014 01:46 AM
Jm538051
Evo X General
1
Jan 20, 2014 07:43 AM
DeweyD
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
12
Aug 28, 2013 02:54 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 PM.