Notices
DynoFlash [Visit Site]

K & N Typhoon Intake advisory !!!!!!! READ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #121  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by erioshi
Actually switching to the stock rubber tube helped quite a bit. The car's low speed driveability is much better (like the stock airbox) and the car no longer has waste gate flutter at low rpms. I'm not sure if it's providing better power than the stock airbox, though. It also cuts the the sound of the waste gate dumping down to very quiet, although it doesn't quiet the intake air all that much. One other bonus has been that the idle has less lope now and is overal more stable and less prone to stalling - again it's closer to the stock airbox.

After another close look at the way the stock rubber tube was designed comaperd to the HKS aluminum tube, in addition to the issues with that big blade (turbulence and reduced flow) I also looked at the way dumped air (wastegate) and vaccum for the boost controler were being recyled into back into the intake stream - in both cases the OEM tube looks to have a better design. I also think that sudden change in intake size right at the turbo inlet might be a source of problems.
I love the K & N filter on the STI - but it seems that the Evo Typhoon realy sucks. Obviously, K & N has no intentions to re-design th set up - this despite hundreds of contacts from disappointed end users and this thread here.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 08:58 AM
  #122  
aps's Avatar
aps
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Türkey/İstanbul
I am using typhoon kit and before install the kit I had got a little idle problem(Because of bov) especially a/c is on and when I ınstall the kit my problem is bacame bad, sometimes my car stop when I shift the gear.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #123  
erioshi's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I love the K & N filter on the STI - but it seems that the Evo Typhoon realy sucks. Obviously, K & N has no intentions to re-design th set up - this despite hundreds of contacts from disappointed end users and this thread here.
I completely agree Al. I've been messing around with mine because I didn't want just write off the purchase and I didn't want to sell it to someone else. I would definitely not buy a new one (for the Evo)!

It does look like using the cone and mounting plate while keeping the OEM rubber pipe worked well in my car. Even with the boost hitting late (bad boost controller) the car put down better power in that configuration than it did with the complete K&N set-up or the OEM air box.

Your mileage may vary, but it might be a way to salvage something from the purchase.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 03:47 PM
  #124  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by erioshi
I completely agree Al. I've been messing around with mine because I didn't want just write off the purchase and I didn't want to sell it to someone else. I would definitely not buy a new one (for the Evo)!

It does look like using the cone and mounting plate while keeping the OEM rubber pipe worked well in my car. Even with the boost hitting late (bad boost controller) the car put down better power in that configuration than it did with the complete K&N set-up or the OEM air box.

Your mileage may vary, but it might be a way to salvage something from the purchase.
I comend you for yout ethics - I have seen several of my customers sell parts which did not work - e.g. - Typhoon Intakes - and TX's MBC's and also very poorly made exahusts - only to later find the same parts turn up in a future tuning session in some other town - sold on the clasifieds section

A better man - such as yourself - would not inflict the problem on someone else - - hopefully K & N will pay some attention to this condition
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #125  
BaLListic_EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: NC
you just said TX boost controls... are your refering to the Turbo XS mbc????
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #126  
evoego's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Dirty South
Ive always thought of taking mine out, but honestly no problems to date and going for over a yr now....I hate to spend more money on an intake just to see whats up..maybe I will try the stocker and a drop in...
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #127  
BlueBlurSTi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 362
Likes: 7
From: IL
mine works great but i have a sti..

too bad it sux on the evo
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #128  
evo8dad's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
From: Sellersville, PA
As I have said in previos posts, I have had absolutely no problems with my K&N intake (03 CT9A).
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #129  
evoego's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Dirty South
Originally Posted by fstgvr4
As I have said in previos posts, I have had absolutely no problems with my K&N intake (03 CT9A).
hell I 2nd that..me likey alot..
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 03:59 PM
  #130  
cr's Avatar
cr
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: butler, pa
k&n typhoon

put one on my 04, definetley dropped my boost and power.....filter is fine tube is a problem..............
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #131  
hokiruu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: Truckee, CA
I test drove an evo for the first time last night and was somewhat disappointed with its performance compared to the STi I test drove, but somehow I remembered being blown away the first time I rode in one. I noticed it stumbling and lurching etc. and the recirc. valve fluttered like an aftermarket or vented to atmos. one, and I finally realized it has a K&N intake on it! At certain rpms if I'd shift or be at part throttle, it really ran like ****. Possibly worse than what some of you have described 9maybe because I'm at about 7500' elevation), but only at shifts and part throttle, it ran perfect the rest of the time, albeit a bit slower than expected. Needless to say, now I know the intake is to blame as I had suspected.

My question is: some of you have said it caused your car to run very rich or lean and even detonating. This car has 26k miles and it's safe to assume it's been run hard for all of them, probably with this intake. Do you think I should worry about the life of this engine due to the amount of A/F changes caused by this intake? It's one of the only ones near me for sale, and I am somewhat inclined to buy it.

Last edited by hokiruu; May 3, 2006 at 10:20 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #132  
ApexVIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
thats odd because i have not had one problem with my intake. idels just like stock. i think they might have had a bad batch or something... i dont know
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #133  
hokiruu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: Truckee, CA
I later discovered the culprit for the cars horrible performance was due to the fact that the dork had the recirc. valve on backwards. I bought the car, turned it around, and it works fine now. Still a bit skeptical of the intake though. I took the CF "heat shield" off. I will be changing to another intake when I don't have more important things to spend $ on...
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2006 | 08:56 PM
  #134  
Absolut_VIII's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnasti
I have recently installed the K&N intake system and have run into nothing but problems. My boost still gets up to around 20-21 psi, but then under hard acceleration, the car seems as though it begins to miss fire/cut out. I am going to re-install the stock intake tube and see if this is the problem.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #135  
Q8_EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
K&N Typhoon ... I was about to order .. good that i searched.
So you guys dont recommend the K&N typhoon? is there an alternative way.. there is a guy over here with a AEM filter, Looked good and he says its running real good with no issues.

God i miss my 350z.. you just thro anything in that Z and it will gain power, No need for a flash... next thing I will soon hear is a flash whenever i refuel the car. whats up with all the ecu reflash... is it that sensitive .. or is it that dumb
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 PM.