Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

Intercoolers and E85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 10:21 AM
  #1  
EVIL_EV0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
Intercoolers and E85

When I was running pump/race gas I went out and bought an ETS 3.5" FMIC. The thing is a beast both in mass and weight. However the other day I decided to yank the ETS FMIC to give it a good cleaning. I also decided to make no changes other than put the stock FMIC back on and log a pass.

The results were actually in favor of the stock FMIC. The car spooled slightly faster and made the same HP at 30psi. I made a couple back to back pulls each pull was as consistent as the last.

I'm starting to wonder if an aftermarket FMIC is even needed. Has anyone done more extensive testing?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 05:51 PM
  #2  
Thoe99's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
I've always wondered this as well. I also bought a 3.5" ETS intercooler before switching to E85. The cooling properties of E85 are pretty good. I think people will say that the larger intercooler provides more benefits for endurance applications like road racing, but this will definitely be an interesting test.

Btw, how much faster did it spool up? When I switched intercoolers, mine did not slow spool at all.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 05:58 PM
  #3  
PrimerSdime's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, MD
Most dedicated drag cars that are running some form of alcohol don't use an intercooler. I've contemplated taking mine off for weight savings, just haven't gotten around to it.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 06:00 PM
  #4  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 294
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Check your air temps comming into the intake mani and then tell me it made no difference. With a stock fmic and the larger ets you can't tell me there the same.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 06:02 PM
  #5  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
What about heat soak

I run a Nisei 3.75" competition FMIC & will not look back
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 06:16 PM
  #6  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 294
From: Pinckney, Michigan
You have to remember the thing about fmics. They all have a different use being bar and plate and tube and fin. They both have advantages and disadvantages. For most of us bar and plate Garrett cores work the best. Our stock intercoolers are tube and fin which work extremely well for daily driving useage. They also work extremely well for road racing.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 08:27 PM
  #7  
EVIL_EV0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
The spool was just faster to reach psi levels. More noticeable in an excel spreadsheet with side by side columns. I could feel the difference in transition but didn't see much of a difference on the dyno.

I think I'm going to keep the stocker on for now and try to offload my 3.5" as it may very well be overkill even for road racing ... I mean drag racers crank the boost to 30psi but road racers normally keep them under 25psi. I've checked my FMIC right after a session and honestly it's not even hot to the touch. I'm not sure what my intake temps are after the turbo. Is there a hack for that in the stock ecu?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 01:05 PM
  #8  
ryans1000's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
If your worried about cooling/ait temp why not go with an alcohol injection setup such as the Devils Own Kit?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2013 | 08:34 AM
  #9  
Abacus's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 418
From: FL
Bringing this thread back to life. Interested in the E85 route/stock I/C results.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2013 | 04:51 PM
  #10  
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
I think you will see a benefit with larger FMIC with constant heat cycling like on a roadcourse. Three passes does not mean much in the grand scheme of things. Log the difference with 20 minutes of boosting in 100 degree heat and I think a bigger IC will make a difference.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2013 | 08:07 PM
  #11  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
could be tons of things that made it spool quicker, but the biggest one would be the AFR curve changing from the ets to the stocker. e85 responds very weird when it comes to afr and spool. theres multiple ways with e85 to achieve a fast spool.

now looking at the ets 3.5 vs the stock FMIC, the stock FMIC will have less pressure drop since its a smaller intercooler, so in that regard it has the advantage, but cooling wise, its a joke. the ets 3.5 will destroy it in every aspect.

e85 is like a liquid intercooler per say due to its cooling properties, so you wont see a huge impact as you would on 93oct for example.

the ets 3.5 will destroy the stock fmic though in general on any fuel.

my advice: fmic should be one of the first things to change on the car. on 93oct it is a major bottleneck in producing power.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2013 | 08:09 PM
  #12  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by JDMevoBOOST
I think you will see a benefit with larger FMIC with constant heat cycling like on a roadcourse. Three passes does not mean much in the grand scheme of things. Log the difference with 20 minutes of boosting in 100 degree heat and I think a bigger IC will make a difference.
yes good example. the stock fmic will definitely heatsoak before a aftermarket one such as the ets 3.5" fmic.

the reason he got away with the results he did, was because of the turbo size and running e85. if he put 93 in the car, he would lose power for sure and detonate if it was tuned for the larger fmic cooling capabilities.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 04:21 PM
  #13  
Thoe99's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by tscompusa
...theres multiple ways with e85 to achieve a fast spool...
I'm very curious on this, care to explain?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2013 | 04:49 PM
  #14  
evodriver49's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
my friend makes 430 on a dynapack with his stock fmic at 32psi. evo 8 with 9 ported turbo. he doesnt track, but swears heat soak doesnt happen with e85
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 07:30 AM
  #15  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Originally Posted by evodriver49
my friend makes 430 on a dynapack with his stock fmic at 32psi. evo 8 with 9 ported turbo. he doesnt track, but swears heat soak doesnt happen with e85
If that were true then there would be no reason for aftermarket intercoolers. Everyone making real power would still be on the stock one
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
413
Dec 28, 2017 09:11 AM
99gpgtx
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Feb 16, 2016 11:07 AM
formerSTIowner
Evo X Dyno Results
15
Jul 6, 2014 06:14 PM
CT9A PR
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
12
Jun 27, 2014 02:33 PM
jcdeng
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
22
Jan 27, 2010 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:03 PM.