Question, ECU load determining accuracy
Originally Posted by jcsbanks
And there will hopefully be further developments because I have found the 10 bit real load figure in the ECU code. I just need to work out how to dump it out the serial - this is the hold up. So a small change to the ROM would probably do that once I find the location to twiddle. And then a new requestID in Evoscan.
fyi- i still get some load cell descrepencies with the new afrmap calculations, so i am using a combination of the 3 (both afrmap lookups as well as the old 852) for now hehe.
Originally Posted by jcsbanks
And there will hopefully be further developments because I have found the 10 bit real load figure in the ECU code. I just need to work out how to dump it out the serial - this is the hold up. So a small change to the ROM would probably do that once I find the location to twiddle. And then a new requestID in Evoscan.
I know this is old news, but I haven't touched the car in a while. Just some data on how the calculated load differs from actual logged boost:
RPM_Load_RPM_Boost (KPA)
2500 - 99 2500 - 101
3000 - 196 3000 - 197
3500 - 253 3500 - 261
4000 - 255 4000 - 251
4500 - 250 4500 - 253
5000 - 249 5000 - 252
5500 - 240 5500 - 249
6000 - 234 6000 - 250
6500 - 223 6500 - 244
7000 - 215 7000 - 241
Big thanks to Mr. Banks and Malibu Jack. Between the load calculation and the log digester, my life is a lot easier.
RPM_Load_RPM_Boost (KPA)
2500 - 99 2500 - 101
3000 - 196 3000 - 197
3500 - 253 3500 - 261
4000 - 255 4000 - 251
4500 - 250 4500 - 253
5000 - 249 5000 - 252
5500 - 240 5500 - 249
6000 - 234 6000 - 250
6500 - 223 6500 - 244
7000 - 215 7000 - 241
Big thanks to Mr. Banks and Malibu Jack. Between the load calculation and the log digester, my life is a lot easier.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
