Notices
ECU Flash

E-85 and EcuFlash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #46  
thatguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: milfburn
Thanks for the info, its great.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 05:05 AM
  #47  
JrCRXHF's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Midland Mich
Originally Posted by KevinD
no, turbo f4i is so big and heavy and doesn't make any more power then a non turbo f4i on 93. weight is the name of the game in formula sae. cost, complexity, reliability, weight are all worse when you turbo the 4fi. the f4i on 93 will already max out the restrictor, so if your drivers can shift theres no need for a wider power band.

not to get off subject but power under the curve is where the turbo on FSAE cars come in the point of the restrictor is so you don't make any more power but the point you send the restrictor sonic is sooner with a turbo. and with the turbo you can make way more tq.

But anyway i love E85 as a fuel and wal-mart is talking about putting pumps in so that will help with fuel stations.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 06:38 AM
  #48  
PVD04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Another update:

My 780 cc injectors are MAXED OUT. I'm holding ~24.6 psi at 7600 RPM and my IDC from Mitsulogger are at 113% at lambda 0.895 (Gas equiv of 13.2:1). I'm going to turn the boost down a little until I get some larger injectors. Anyone considering making the switch, I'd recommend going with at least 850 cc.

-Paul
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #49  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
When switching to E85 you are adding 30% more fuel for equivalent AFR's so it would be a minimum of 720's for a STOCK car. OF course any mod that you do has that much less give before larger injectors are needed and if you are seeing IDC like that even with 780's, my idea of 1150's probably isnt too far off for an upgraded turbo.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #50  
PVD04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
UPDATE:

Well, I finally got some larger injectors so I'll be able to push the boost a bit more and see how the car responds. Unfortunately, I discovered a hole in my catback so I've got the stock cat back on the car again. It looks like I may be down about 30 or 40 ft-lbs of torque due to that.

Gas mileage is down to about 15-16 mpg, which isn't too bad considering I was getting 19-22 mpg on gasoline. I think if I could keep the car out of boost I could do better, but with all this new power it's hard to do.

Overall I'm pretty happy with the switch.

-Paul
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 05:45 AM
  #51  
JrCRXHF's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Midland Mich
This is good to hear i am going to switch my DSM over and i already have my honda running on it. But i want to keep the War. on the EVO.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #52  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by PVD04
UPDATE:

Well, I finally got some larger injectors so I'll be able to push the boost a bit more and see how the car responds. Unfortunately, I discovered a hole in my catback so I've got the stock cat back on the car again. It looks like I may be down about 30 or 40 ft-lbs of torque due to that.

Gas mileage is down to about 15-16 mpg, which isn't too bad considering I was getting 19-22 mpg on gasoline. I think if I could keep the car out of boost I could do better, but with all this new power it's hard to do.

Overall I'm pretty happy with the switch.

-Paul
Paul with the 1000's what type of IDC and AFR's are you seeing now?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #53  
PVD04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Paul with the 1000's what type of IDC and AFR's are you seeing now?
I'm still getting everything adjusted for the new injectors, but earlier tonight I saw 85% IDC at the gas equivalent of 11:1 at 7000 RPM. I'm targeting a gas equivalent of 12.5:1, so I still have a lot of fuel to take out. Although my boost is a bit lower than I plan on putting it as well. I should have better data by the middle of next week.

-Paul
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #54  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
Does the exhaust smell any different? I know when I run 110 leaded I smell a sweet bleach like scent.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #55  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by JrCRXHF
not to get off subject but power under the curve is where the turbo on FSAE cars come in the point of the restrictor is so you don't make any more power but the point you send the restrictor sonic is sooner with a turbo. and with the turbo you can make way more tq.

But anyway i love E85 as a fuel and wal-mart is talking about putting pumps in so that will help with fuel stations.
i agree you can choke the restrictor with the FSAE car faster with the turbo. there is no question about that. but is it worth all the problems a turbo car has, just to make it so you shift a few times less? i mean, our shifting is so fast it is almost not even noticable. and unless you dry sump the engine with a turbo, you will certainly kill the turbo quickly with the retarded throttlebody positioning rules. we went through 3, and followed all the recommendations including a few "Secret" ideas. none- of which made any difference whatsoever.

only time i would consider the turbo useful is if the NA engine cannot choke the restrictor on its own. i.e. smaller displacement engines. we used the CBR 250, but have also used a CBR 450, and other teams turbo or supercharge a single cylinder 450. the teams with the turbo 600's don't perform any better then the NA 600's. just look at A&M in 05... NA 600 clobbered everyone at acceleration. even cornell with the drysumped turbo 600.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #56  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
Does the exhaust smell any different? I know when I run 110 leaded I smell a sweet bleach like scent.
smells like tiquela on our race car. hahaha.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #57  
PVD04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
Does the exhaust smell any different? I know when I run 110 leaded I smell a sweet bleach like scent.

It's definitely a different smell. I prefer it to the small of catless gasoline exhaust.

-Paul
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #58  
BoostN's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Hendertucky
So I've decided to convert my EvoVIII over to E85 this summer using the stock turbo (05MR16g) and want to ask from your experience what size injectors to run? I'm guessing 780's to 1000cc. Also, I would guess the Walbro 255 would be enough pump?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 07:26 AM
  #59  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
It really depends.. But 780's are more than adequate for a conversion on a stock turbo.. 1000's are somewhat overkill, but if you plan on going to a bigger turbo at some point and still use E85 without a dual pump setup.

I do know on my 35R that being able to make the most out of the turbo, means running quite a bit more boost than typically capable on 93 octane, so I would have to run dual pumps with 1000cc injectors on E85..

Using the Walbro, or Dave Buschur's upgraded pump, will do the job.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #60  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
FWIW, Its all about stepping up to the game, once E85 hits, your going to see alot of supercharged and turbocharged vehicles making monster horsepower on inexpensive fuel..

I built my Malibu (which is supercharged) with the expectation of using E85, The car already produces 650whp on 93 octane pump, imagine running 20psi of boost on that car (I'm running 7psi now) We're estimating over 1000whp on that car when the time comes, but an EFI conversion needs to be done first.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:06 AM.