Notices
ECU Flash

EvoScan v0.98 Now with Power & Torque Graphing - Map Tracing completed also!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #346  
EvoAnthony's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: SlowmotionMotorsports.com
Originally Posted by jdmevo8313
I have yet to recieve the email. And yes I paid, I have .97.

Can I still use the same link that came with the v.97 to download v.98?
Yes you can but I would wait until all the bugs get worked out first....
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #347  
jdmevo8313's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: scarsdale,NY - lima,OH
Originally Posted by Mellon
it's been said 100x in this thread, the mass e-mailing hasn't been done yet because there are bugs to be worked out
sorry didnt read the thread. I just got on here and posted.

Originally Posted by EvoAnthony
Yes you can but I would wait until all the bugs get worked out first....
Ok thanks
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #348  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by ghoonk
My cam gears are set to -1 in / -2 ex at the moment and I was wondering if I should try a different combination (-4/-4?) for better torque.
That would be going in the wrong direction if more midrange torque is what you're wanting.
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #349  
ghoonk's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Thanks. I'll be making a trip to my tuner's to get them dialled in first thing tomorrow morning. Will post new power/torque charts when I'm done.

With a -4/-1 setting, I wonder if I will lose any power up high *ponder*
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #350  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
No, that should actually prolong the power a bit at the expense of a bit of midrange response.
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #351  
evo4mad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: TGA, New Zealand
I am away on business till this weekend, I'll see if I can get it all sorted out then
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 05:29 AM
  #352  
BoostEEd's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence, IN
Originally Posted by evo4mad
I am away on business till this weekend, I'll see if I can get it all sorted out then
Off Topic: Have a safe trip
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 05:11 PM
  #353  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by evo4mad
I am away on business till this weekend, I'll see if I can get it all sorted out then
Stay out of trouble
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 01:55 AM
  #354  
o.e.boost's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: 559
Originally Posted by EvoAnthony
X2...I need help too!
me 3
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #355  
colby's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by evo4mad
Yes they are 100% compatable, and will continue to be, I even kept the same USB PID so that you can use the same installed drivers. Which is especially important for Mobile device drivers, ya don't want two sets of drivers taking up memory. The EvoScan 1.4E cable is a low cost solution and contains no boot flash circuits, The EvoScan 1.3M is the same design as the openport 1.3M and supports the boot flash connector.
I've been trying to get in touch with Hamish, but he appears quite busy at the moment. Until I come up with another solution, at this point I cannot support the EvoScan 1.3M with the EcuFlash software since buying the cable from Hamish does nothing to support the development of EcuFlash. I'm trying to figure out a solution to this, as I would like to keep the EcuFlash software freely distributed yet keep the project funded. I am also unsure as to the specifics of his cable design, but all of the OpenPort designs are copyright Tactrix Inc., even though I do make the schematics public for informational reasons.

Colby
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #356  
NIevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 4
From: Hayden, ID
I have the Version .97 but have never received any updates or e-mails? Is there any way to check and make sure your on the mailing list? I know the e-mail hasn't gone out yet for the new version but you'd think I would have received something in the last 7 months or so.
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #357  
RedV's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
EvoScan .98 issue

So thought I'd give EvoScan .98 a try today.

Hooked up the cable, with the OBDII connector only, not the white flash plug because of the problems I've read other people having with version .98. Clicked the log button and the software begins logging, but quits shortly after. It then appears to continuously retry it's connection.

During it's brief logging session, the values that it logs are obviously not correct. Attached is a example of the short log that was captured with the car sitting idle in the driveway.

Just for example, the RPM value jumps around from 0 to 7750, the coolant goes from 273 to -2285, and the knock count goes from 0 to 248! Obviously this isn't right.

I have read that the version of release .98 that's out isn't completely bug free yet, but I thought I'd post this to possibly help evo4mad track some of them down.

Version .97 still logs just fine, so I'm pretty sure it's not a hardware/software install problem.

This is a 2006 USDM Evo IX GSR with ECUID 88590015 and the 1.3M cable.
Attached Files

Last edited by RedV; Mar 11, 2007 at 07:22 PM.
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #358  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
thats weird - i would dbl check your cable is in correctly..
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #359  
RedV's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Checked it, plus version .97 logs perfectly. So I don't think it's a cable issue.

Originally Posted by tephra
thats weird - i would dbl check your cable is in correctly..
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 08:35 PM
  #360  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
I'll have to talk to Hamish about this, but I think he got bit by the same bug I came across in my code due to how the drivers changed recently. If he started with the same FTDI driver and FTDI sample project code as I did, there was a flow control value that was not really honored in the earlier driver, which is now. It caused all sorts of performance problems for me.

Last edited by MalibuJack; Mar 11, 2007 at 08:39 PM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 AM.