Notices
ECU Flash

Evo IX 2-byte Load & Lean Spool for Dummies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #241  
Jon91TSi's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Bernville, PA
I'm at 11.3 AFR
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #242  
Jon91TSi's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Bernville, PA
Ok.. as promised here are my logs from tonight. I found it best to use a variant of the leanspool map that tephra posted (thanks for getting me off to a great start ). Anyway I am using my timing map from Mellon with no changes just a new fueling map and as you can see the AFR is about as smooth as I can get it. It sits right at 11.2.5-3. The car seems to like it a little richer than 11.5. I am seeing 16* advance by 7100 rpm with no knock at all throughout the entire run. I am also posting a log from a pull through the gears. As you can see the AFR curve is nearly identical each shift! This mod rocks!!! The car pulls so much harder and each pull is identical!






Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #243  
hearnoevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: cali
antilag

So I took a look at my start and stop antilag settings and it looks like the tuner changed the stop to 7844. Can someone tell me the reason for this? I'm looking to change the start and stop numbers to 1500 and 1531 like tephra says, then logging and leaning out the fuel map. Anything else I'm missing?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #244  
amak87's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley
wow, looks great. I want to try this for better Mpg's..
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #245  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Jon91TSi
. I found it best to use a variant of the leanspool map that tephra posted (thanks for getting me off to a great start ).
Can you point me to the tephra leanspool fuel map? Thanks
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #246  
Jon91TSi's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Bernville, PA
It was under a thread called lets see your leanspool maps.. Be aware however that it was extremely lean on my car 12.7:1.. I had to richen it up quite a bit and smooth it back out.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #247  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah dont just copy anyones maps, use them as a reference and education point...

every car is different, and what is ok for one car may not be for another..
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #248  
Jon91TSi's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Bernville, PA
But your map worked out very nicely with a few tweaks.. I ran the car tonight and with a sub par 3-4 shift ran 12.3@110.5..
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #249  
Dragracer187's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: The Dragstrip
wonderfull thread, learned a lot again...
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 02:35 AM
  #250  
Asmodeus6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Scanned this briefly for 96530006...

Do we have a lean spool enable/disable? Is it the same as 96940011?

Originally Posted by JohnBradley
For the 03-04 VIII's it is 1681 and 1685 for the 1 byte code. This is enable/disable in that order. The 05 is the same as the IX and is 1281/1285.
None of these work. They all come up 204 / 204 or some other non rpm resembling gibberish.



Any one have a way to kill it for sure on this rom?

Found it. 1680/1684

Last edited by Asmodeus6; Jul 15, 2008 at 03:17 AM. Reason: I'm stupid.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #251  
mfr122887's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Can lean spool also be disabled through a periphery bit? I have been reading and saw a few threads where it is mentioned, but in this thread a few people have said that this method is the only effective way? Which way is better or does it not matter?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 01:51 PM
  #252  
vicbdn's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
For evo8s i found the instructions pretty confusing. There's a huge list of things u need to add to the XML which doesn't really explain what to do and its unneccesary.
Following the instructions for option 2 for evo9s(Start RPM address 1280, Stop RPM address change from 1282 to 1284), i figured you just added 2 to the memory address, only for evo8s the values start at 1680 instead of 1280. You cannot disable lean spool with just changing the stop RPM to 2500 as a lot of people mention and I believe they said to not do it if your value does not read 7000.

You have to change the memory address for the stop RPM to 1684. Normally in ECUflash the address for anti lag stop RPM points to 1682, which will read 4531 at default(Dunno what this value is for). After changing the address to 1684, the value should read 7000, which I then decreased to 2500.

Last edited by vicbdn; Jul 26, 2008 at 02:22 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #253  
Jorge T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by vicbdn
For evo8s i found the instructions pretty confusing. There's a huge list of things u need to add to the XML which doesn't really explain what to do.
Following the instructions for option 2 for evo9s(Start RPM address 1280, Stop RPM address change from 1282 to 1284), i figured you just added 2 to the memory address, only for evo8s the values start at 1680 instead of 1280. You cannot disable lean spool with just changing the stop RPM to 2500 as a lot of people mention and I believe they said to not do it if your value does not read 7000.

You have to change the memory address for the stop RPM to 1684. Normally in ECUflash the address for anti lag stop RPM points to 1682, which will read 4531 at default(Dunno what this value is for). After changing the address to 1684, the value should read 7000, which I then decreased to 2500.
This is the one for 8s https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...hlight=dummies ...
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #254  
vicbdn's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
That's 2 byte load not lean spool
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #255  
Jumperalex's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria VA
Why shut off rather than modify?

I understand that the general reason to turn off lean spool is to get more consistent and thus tunable AFRs. I also noticed that a lot of people also like the less spiky boost response during spool up.

But what I've been wondering is why not adjust lean spool RPM such that it only happens where we aren't quiet worried about AFR yet and where boost tends to struggle the most to build. I am thinking allow lean spool up to about 3500 rpm. That way you get the faster spool in cases where you might not want to downshift but then after 3500 spool-up isn't too fsat to overshoot and AFRs aren't impacted.

Thoughts?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 AM.