Heres the definition for "2ByteLoad" for 88590015

<table name="2 byte load high bit" address="3EE86" category="Misc" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint16" />

<table name="2 byte load low bit" address="3EE8A" category="Misc" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint16" />

when u open up ecuflash (make sure ur in developer mode) and for
2 byte load high bit = 27458
2 byte load low bit = 27459

 

I would also like to know the answer to the question above. I went through the whole thread and no one answered this question.

 

Any experience on EDM 88840013 ROM for address of 2 byte load?

Marcel

 

maybe you can update to 88840017 more you can find here:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...light=88840017

than you can use this variables:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=327185

 

yup update to 17... should be ok

 

how can I be sure leanspool is dissabled?

 

If I disable the lean spool, does that mean that I will need to redo all the fuel map from 2500 till redline because all the values will now be on the rich side? That also affects the low octane maps?

Does it makes sense to just turn off lean spool past redline so you never hit it and maybe start the turn off on 2000 instead of 2500 and have almost the whole map in disable mode? Will this be easier to tune in the sense that less cells need to be redone?

 

on my car when leanspool is enabled and if i make any changes to fuel map,my afr stays the same and always runs on the lean side,wierd??
But when i disable lean spool my afr changes a lot peak boost around 12 and then tappers to 11.3 at redline,and car seems to run much better and with very little knock,1-2 knock only coming onto boost.

 

NM, Problem sorted out

 

Have anyone else seen this issue or any other weird thing after disabling lean spool?

 

if, when you put the XML in for leanspool, the stock values are NOT 2500 and 7000 then you have entered the wrong XML.

 

That’s OK but what about the halving in injector pulse width at high loads have anyone else seen that or is that an isolated case or perhaps related to a wrong implementation of the lean spool disable. If the halving occurs it sound like it would not be safe to disable lean spool.

 

what halving? never heardof that

 

Check out the link on post $205. That's what I am asking about.

 

I recently added the Enable/Disable lean spool definitions to my ROM but I'm not ready to start messing with them yet. Can somebody tell me what the factory settings are for these fields? Right now LeanSpoolEnable = 80 and LeanSpoolDisable = 255.