9653006v5 WORKS for 05 USDM (9694011)

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 25, 2008 | 03:23 PM

#46

tephra

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 67

From: Melbourne, Australia

as JohnF said the stock EcuFlash XML for 96530006 is a bit **** - maybe he can post up a link to his copy?

Mar 25, 2008 | 04:52 PM

#47

John F

Evolving Member

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 121

Likes: 0

From: Edinburgh, UK

You can download my XML file here http://homepage.mac.com/johnny_fergu...530006.xml.zip
As has been stated before Open Loop RPM doesn't look quite right but everything I use is OK.

Mar 25, 2008 | 05:35 PM

#48

tephra

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 67

From: Melbourne, Australia

John - I just took a look at the disasm - you can use elements=16 for the OpenLoop Loads ie

Code:

<table name="Open Loop Load # 1" address="3624">
	<table name="RPM" address="6594" elements="16"/>
</table>

<table name="Open Loop Load # 2" address="363a">
	<table name="RPM" address="6594" elements="16"/>
</table>

<table name="Open Loop Throttle Low Load" address="3656">
	<table name="RPM" address="6594" elements="16"/>
</table>

<table name="Open Loop Throttle High Load" address="366c">
	<table name="RPM" address="6594" elements="16"/>
</table>

Mar 25, 2008 | 05:55 PM

#49

John F

Evolving Member

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 121

Likes: 0

From: Edinburgh, UK

Great. Thanks. I have updated the file.

The RPM side still doesn't go to 7500 like other ROMS!

Last edited by John F; Mar 25, 2008 at 06:06 PM.

Mar 25, 2008 | 06:11 PM

#50

tephra

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 67

From: Melbourne, Australia

no, but you could rework the axis to get 7500 if you wanted.

however there probably isn't much point as 6000 == 7500 for the purpose of determining open/closed loop operation

Mar 25, 2008 | 11:46 PM

#51

evo828

Evolving Member

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 195

Likes: 1

From: Slovakia

Quote:

Originally Posted by tkklemann

So, from the sounds of it, the 96530006 does not support EGR, possibly other things. Once this is working, flashing a USDM 96940011 car will render the EGR system inoperable.

So, once we flash with the 9650006 ROM, we will be able to remove all the EGR parts because it will be unsupported by the ROM? (I hope so, I love less parts to fail! And for simplicity!) (And I live in SC, no vehicle inspections!)

Korekt?

96530006 supports EGR and the hardware is in my edm evo8.

Mar 26, 2008 | 03:55 AM

#52

tkklemann

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,228

Likes: 0

From: Charleston, SC

Quote:

Originally Posted by evo828

96530006 supports EGR and the hardware is in my edm evo8.

Damn. I would have loved to be able to pull semi-useless parts off my car...

Mar 26, 2008 | 06:36 AM

#53

John F

Evolving Member

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 121

Likes: 0

From: Edinburgh, UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by evo828

96530006 supports EGR and the hardware is in my edm evo8.

I just had a look for the EGR hardware on my car and can confirm that it is on my car too. I was 99.9% sure the Euro spec Evo would not have EGR but now I am 100% sure it does.

Mar 26, 2008 | 07:09 AM

#54

Youngsyr

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 125

Likes: 1

From: London, England

Quote:

Originally Posted by John F

I just had a look for the EGR hardware on my car and can confirm that it is on my car too. I was 99.9% sure the Euro spec Evo would not have EGR but now I am 100% sure it does.

It seems the 260 and USDM could be very similar cars as I believe they share the same cams, as well as having compatible ROM IDs, EGR but no SAS and the two O2 sensors.

Mar 26, 2008 | 06:49 PM

#55

rish197

Thread Starter

Evolving Member

iTrader: (34)

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 147

Likes: 0

From: FLORIDA

I know it was mentioned, but I read through the JDM MAP Sensor post. Is there anything that needs to be changed in the XML to use this, or is it plug and play?

Mar 26, 2008 | 08:19 PM

#56

mrfred

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (50)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 9,675

Likes: 132

From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR

Quote:

Originally Posted by rish197

I know it was mentioned, but I read through the JDM MAP Sensor post. Is there anything that needs to be changed in the XML to use this, or is it plug and play?

Plug and play if you just want to log boost. Some mods need to be done to control boost with the MAP sensor.

Mar 27, 2008 | 12:37 PM

#57

gear head

Evolving Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 333

Likes: 0

From: Utah

mrfred, do you need to work these mods(direct boost)out or are they posted somewhere & I missed them.

Mar 27, 2008 | 01:05 PM

#58

mrfred

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (50)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 9,675

Likes: 132

From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR

Quote:

Originally Posted by gear head

mrfred, do you need to work these mods(direct boost)out or are they posted somewhere & I missed them.

Haven't worked out the mods yet. Waiting for the dust to settle on whether people are going to use this ROM instead of 96940011.

Mar 27, 2008 | 04:26 PM

#59

laramie_05MR

Evolving Member

iTrader: (20)

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 417

Likes: 1

From: texas

I will be using this rom.

Mar 27, 2008 | 05:51 PM

#60

logic

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 1,022

Likes: 7

From: Berkeley, CA

All I need is about 30 minutes of uninterrupted time (yeah, right, good luck with that

) to transfer over my maps, and all the XML changes and tweaks I made, to Dave's v5 96530006, and I'll be running it (sans direct boost control). Map switching is what you might call a "compelling feature" for me.

Reply Share

First
Prev
4 / 17
Next
Last