openport 2.0

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 26, 2008 | 11:26 PM

#76

Evo_Jay

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,419

Likes: 14

From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)

Quote:

Originally Posted by nj1266

WTH....What do I have to do with this. Just because Evo_Kid said it, does not make it true. Razorlab, myself, mrfred and MANY others are running ECUboost control with great results.

Evo_Kid posted that it takes time to get it right. Maybe he does not want to invest the time in it. He would rather use an MBC. That is his choice. It is just a choice. It does not make ECU boost worthless.

LOL Nj, did you even see the section he made bold from his own post. He wasnt talking about boost control. Here, Ill help ya....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sky Evo X

You know why so many people looked at your page nj1266? Because you were the only one bored enough to google, and search through the forums and basically copy and paste every bit of info you found and put it in one place.
You did the dirty work and people are thankful.

Apr 27, 2008 | 04:12 AM

#77

nj1266

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 3,254

Likes: 13

From: USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo_Kid

LOL Nj, did you even see the section he made bold from his own post. He wasnt talking about boost control. Here, Ill help ya....

The fact is that I took the time and logged the data and wrote the text. It was my way of thanking the people of ECUflash for sharing their knowledge with me. A lot of people use the write-up as indicated by the hits and responses.

Apr 27, 2008 | 08:01 AM

#78

Ludikraut

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 6,224

Likes: 0

From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W

Everyone in favor of removing all Evo_Kid, Sky_Evo_X, and nj1266 posts in this thread, please raise your hand...

For God's sake let's stop the posturing and OT...

l8r)

Apr 27, 2008 | 02:17 PM

#79

Evo_Jay

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,419

Likes: 14

From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)

Quote:

Originally Posted by nj1266

I know. I was just telling you that he was referring to something else.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ludikraut

Everyone in favor of removing all Evo_Kid, Sky_Evo_X, and nj1266 posts in this thread, please raise your hand...

For God's sake let's stop the posturing and OT...

l8r)

Yeah, this did get way OT. Sorry.

Apr 29, 2008 | 01:49 PM

#80

Mr. Evo IX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,910

Likes: 1

From: Plano, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sky Evo X

I personally don't think software for the X will leak to a level of control ECUTEK will offer currently for a while.

What are you talking about... "leak to a level of control". Do you think that opensource progress depends on "leaks" from ECUTEK of all places.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sky Evo X

This is the Evolution X forum, not the ECUFLASH forum for the Evo IX.

Your right.. This is the openport 2.0 thread. Keep, in mind openport 2.0 is probably going to be the ECU Flash cable for the X.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ludikraut

Everyone in favor of removing all Evo_Kid, Sky_Evo_X, and nj1266 posts in this thread, please raise your hand...

For God's sake let's stop the posturing and OT...

+1,000,000

Last edited by Mr. Evo IX; Apr 29, 2008 at 01:52 PM.

Apr 29, 2008 | 07:36 PM

#81

nj1266

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 3,254

Likes: 13

From: USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Evo IX

What are you talking about... "leak to a level of control". Do you think that opensource progress depends on "leaks" from ECUTEK of all places.

I think he meant to type "lead."

All this hate towards open source and ECUflash. Let us see what happens when it comes out and it undercuts the price of getting a tune by about $300 (lic fee). All the tuners hi-fiving ECUtek will start using ECUflash instead. The same thing happened with the 8-9. Why pay $750 for a pro tune when you can pay $450 for the same tune from the same tuner!!!