96530706 + DMA +LiveMap + SD - working
l2r99gst, I went through the thread seeing who was replying, I had the idea that maybe this problem is with the 96530706 rom only. You and gear head are the only two that seem to be running SD on that rom (according to this thread). One or two others have tried but seems like they haven't gotten to test driving stages yet.
Just another thought.
Just another thought.
I wonder if it's this ROM as well. The problem is that not too many people are running SD, period, whether with this ROM or not.
I noticed one other person complaining of similar symptoms on the 94170015 ROM, though. But I think others have tested SD OK, like mrfred and jcsbanks.
I noticed one other person complaining of similar symptoms on the 94170015 ROM, though. But I think others have tested SD OK, like mrfred and jcsbanks.
I wonder if it's this ROM as well. The problem is that not too many people are running SD, period, whether with this ROM or not.
I noticed one other person complaining of similar symptoms on the 94170015 ROM, though. But I think others have tested SD OK, like mrfred and jcsbanks.
I noticed one other person complaining of similar symptoms on the 94170015 ROM, though. But I think others have tested SD OK, like mrfred and jcsbanks.
Also, I did try with v5 of 96530006 with the same results.
Evolving Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Willmar MN
I'm having an issue with the 96530706 SD as well. It stutters sometimes when cruising in vacuum, and the fueling is off for a split second with a big MAP change -- decrease = rich, increase = lean. I was previously running the tephramod v510 96530006 with a MAS with no issues at all.
If anyone is wondering why they saw this post on two different threads, l2r99gst pointed me to this one after reading my post on the "Links to jcsbanks' Speed Density patches " thread.
If anyone is wondering why they saw this post on two different threads, l2r99gst pointed me to this one after reading my post on the "Links to jcsbanks' Speed Density patches " thread.
You may be able to fix up some of that issue with the asynch_vs_tps table. I added about 8 to all of the values. That will help with the leanness right as you press the throttle.
This stumble that has been mentioned in this thread is during normal cruise, at steady throttle, or slightly moving throttle. You probably are experiencing that as well. Just look at your IPW in the trouble area mentioned.
This stumble that has been mentioned in this thread is during normal cruise, at steady throttle, or slightly moving throttle. You probably are experiencing that as well. Just look at your IPW in the trouble area mentioned.
Evolving Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Willmar MN
You may be able to fix up some of that issue with the asynch_vs_tps table. I added about 8 to all of the values. That will help with the leanness right as you press the throttle.
This stumble that has been mentioned in this thread is during normal cruise, at steady throttle, or slightly moving throttle. You probably are experiencing that as well. Just look at your IPW in the trouble area mentioned.
This stumble that has been mentioned in this thread is during normal cruise, at steady throttle, or slightly moving throttle. You probably are experiencing that as well. Just look at your IPW in the trouble area mentioned.
Anything available yet to adjust for that cruise issue?
Code:
<table name="Asynch_Acell_Enrichment" category="Fuel" address="1654" type="2D" level="1" scaling="uint16"> <table name="X" type="Static Y Axis" elements="5"> <data>pause_period</data> <data>min_TPSdelta</data> <data>Max_pulsewidth</data> <data>idle_TPSRange</data> <data>after_engine_start_addition</data> </table> </table> <table name="Asynch_VS_TPSDELTA" category="Fuel" address="38a2" type="2D" level="1" scaling="uint8"> <table name="X" type="Static Y Axis" elements="9"> <data>0</data> <data>1</data> <data>2</data> <data>3</data> <data>4</data> <data>5</data> <data>6</data> <data>7</data> <data>8</data> </table> </table> <table name="Asynch_TPS(Rpm) Limit" category="Fuel" address="38b2" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty"> <table name="X" address="6622" type="Y Axis" elements="10" scaling="RPM"/> </table> <table name="Asynch_Accel_vsRPM" category="Fuel" address="38d0" type="2D" level="1" scaling="uint8"> <table name="X" address="6622" type="Y Axis" elements="15" scaling="RPM"/> </table>
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I don't see a strong correlation with any of the SD-related variables (MAP, RPM, MAT, master load, calculated MAF Hz). It will be interesting to see what you get when you get logs in MAF mode.