96530706 + DMA +LiveMap + SD - working
Here you go.
Edit: BTW, I'm not sure if you have been following this thread or not and my issue with the jumpy IPW in a small map/rpm range with SD....but if you see anything in the code or have any suggestions, let me know.
Eric
Edit: BTW, I'm not sure if you have been following this thread or not and my issue with the jumpy IPW in a small map/rpm range with SD....but if you see anything in the code or have any suggestions, let me know.
Eric
It would be easier if I could read the ROM code so I knew what variables to log. 
I have logged a few key ones so far with nothing suggestive of the issue yet, though.
Of course I'm not asking you to waste time with this...just if you run through some of the code and routines when writing your patches and something comes across that is worthwhile logging.
I have logged a few key ones so far with nothing suggestive of the issue yet, though.Of course I'm not asking you to waste time with this...just if you run through some of the code and routines when writing your patches and something comes across that is worthwhile logging.
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: maine
Would anyone happen to know the tables for cold starts on this rom? My car takes about 8 cranks to start, then runs like *** until it warms up. I have to keep reving it until the needle for the temp guage starts to move before it will stabilize. Once war, it starts and idles fine.
Evolving Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
guys, can someone help me. I want to run 96530706 rom with livemap, but without SD patch. Is that possible to do so ? I got Logic's pathc for DMA/live map, added all tables to XML file, but the live map program says "unable to open port", why could this happen ?
Would anyone happen to know the tables for cold starts on this rom? My car takes about 8 cranks to start, then runs like *** until it warms up. I have to keep reving it until the needle for the temp guage starts to move before it will stabilize. Once war, it starts and idles fine.
Code:
<table name="Start IPW latency mcsec" category="Fuel" address="1569" type="1D" level="1" scaling="McSec"/> <table name="IPW comp starting" category="Fuel" address="3822" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69be" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="Cranking Primer (First Pulse)" category="Fuel" address="5b3a" type="2D" level="3" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69f4" type="Y Axis" elements="11" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp warmup 1" category="Fuel" address="3712" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp warmup 2" category="Fuel" address="3722" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp running 1" category="Fuel" address="3732" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp running 2" category="Fuel" address="3742" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp running 3" category="Fuel" address="3752" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp running 4" category="Fuel" address="3762" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp running 5" category="Fuel" address="3772" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp running 6" category="Fuel" address="3782" type="2D" level="1" scaling="IPW mcsec"> <table name="Water temp" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="Temp"/> </table> <table name="IPW comp starting" address="3822"/>
Could someone take a look at the attached log and give me some feedback.
The JDM boost values are not matching my boost guage its reading about half the guage reading and the MAT reading is stuck on -38.xxxx.
Help me please.
The JDM boost values are not matching my boost guage its reading about half the guage reading and the MAT reading is stuck on -38.xxxx.
Help me please.
Last edited by golruss; Aug 16, 2009 at 03:10 PM.
I'm just starting to tune my SD set-up, but I already feel the issue that Eric is talking about. It's right around 2,000 at light cruise. 5th gear and 50 mph triggers it. I won't be able to do much tuning on my set-up because I'm about to leave on a trip, but I just wanted to throw it out there. I'm running a 3.5 bar remotely mounted Zeitronix MAP sensor and 1050cc injectors.
I just curious...are others running SD finding that their cars run smoother, about the same, or worse? My car definitely feels a little choppier, like the timing fluctuations are more granular or something. Hopefully, it's just the load cells not being dialed in yet. It felt that way with the loads too high (rich) and too low (lean). The issue at 2000 rpm cruise doesn't bother me because I almost never cruise at 2000 rpm. I keep the revs higher due to having a Red under the hood.
It is very cool to disconnect the MAF sensor though and have everything still work!
I just curious...are others running SD finding that their cars run smoother, about the same, or worse? My car definitely feels a little choppier, like the timing fluctuations are more granular or something. Hopefully, it's just the load cells not being dialed in yet. It felt that way with the loads too high (rich) and too low (lean). The issue at 2000 rpm cruise doesn't bother me because I almost never cruise at 2000 rpm. I keep the revs higher due to having a Red under the hood.
It is very cool to disconnect the MAF sensor though and have everything still work!
Evolved Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 6
From: UK
Mine felt smoother everywhere than using the MAF, and I am very fussy indeed.
I can only think that there is something different with the ROM being tested to my JDM Evo IX, but I have too many other projects on the go to develop this further.
I can only think that there is something different with the ROM being tested to my JDM Evo IX, but I have too many other projects on the go to develop this further.