Adding load columns and RPM rows to maps
By all means jump to a standalone, you won't hurt anybodys feelings here. If you want to keep *****ing/complaining/moaning however take it somewhere else. I'm sure you are a nice guy and all but honestly keep your "theories" out of it. Many of the people in this very thread have worked on motec, AEM, Haltech, etc.... and your comments are just unrealistic, unacceptable, and uneducated.
.
By all means jump to a standalone, you won't hurt anybodys feelings here. If you want to keep *****ing/complaining/moaning however take it somewhere else. I'm sure you are a nice guy and all but honestly keep your "theories" out of it. Many of the people in this very thread have worked on motec, AEM, Haltech, etc.... and your comments are just unrealistic, unacceptable, and uneducated.
Please refrain from your belittling of others for the sake of your own salvation.
Back to the topic at hand.
If it can be done....go for it. I'll be on the sidelines.
Load and RPM.
I decided to set my MAP sensor up the right way so I dont look like a hack, but the idea of 400kpa and low resolution is not particularly appetizing. I would definitely take Load before rpm but if I had 5 more of each I'd be golden.
Dave, shoot me some ideas and I will see what the pocket book can finance.
I decided to set my MAP sensor up the right way so I dont look like a hack, but the idea of 400kpa and low resolution is not particularly appetizing. I would definitely take Load before rpm but if I had 5 more of each I'd be golden.
Dave, shoot me some ideas and I will see what the pocket book can finance.
Using a 5bar map with a small evo 8 map leaves much to be desired.
this is actually what I'd like to do to my next set up. I can see that the stock ecu will continue to progress and eventually not need to be replace by any standalone. These ecus are now being used in earlier eclipses for this sole reason. Its alot more capable than what most had ever expected, including me.
count me in on the funds. This community has done alot. Thanks to the people who continue to look for ways to make it better.
count me in on the funds. This community has done alot. Thanks to the people who continue to look for ways to make it better.
Would extending the main fuel and timing maps affect the other maps using those axis? Or is it possible to just create a new main fuel and timing map then continue using all the stock axis for all the other maps, like the cold start ignition maps?
It would be great if you could more or less leave the sub 200 loads alone to maintain exceptional driveability under all the conditions that aren't "normal operating conditions" in the eyes of the ECU.
Extended 96530706 tables would be on my want list.
It would be great if you could more or less leave the sub 200 loads alone to maintain exceptional driveability under all the conditions that aren't "normal operating conditions" in the eyes of the ECU.
Extended 96530706 tables would be on my want list.
By all means jump to a standalone, you won't hurt anybodys feelings here. If you want to keep *****ing/complaining/moaning however take it somewhere else. I'm sure you are a nice guy and all but honestly keep your "theories" out of it. Many of the people in this very thread have worked on motec, AEM, Haltech, etc.... and your comments are just unrealistic, unacceptable, and uneducated.
I agree with the basic point that Appauldd was trying to make, even if it was a bit too dramatic
. Anyway lets watch this and see how it plays out...seems there are lots of guinea pigs here ready and waiting to test this out so just like the previous steps forward, lets see how this plays out 
.I'd also really hope that those who are itching for this are sending tephra some money for his hard work
I am also in support, and am interested in the testing process, however, not ready to make the jump to the new V7 Tephra ROM. So if the patch is only going to be for that rom ID then I am in support and will watch from the sidlines until I move to the new V7 or we find it in the 94170015 rom. Patience is a virtue I recon...
From what I know of the specs of the factory ECU, there is enough space to double the rom or flash that is loaded via ECUFLash. COBB's handheld proved that. There is the flash that is stored in hard memory, and the flash that is stored in ram. I could be missing something on those specifics, but none the less, the space is there. Can it be a small enough foot print in code to keep the ecu from stressing on the extra read and seek time? It seems that even though the room is there in the hardware storage, are you able to scale the flash memory to include the extra addresses? It sounds as if you are, but just a toss out for geeks. Thats where hardware electronic failure starts...heat.
From what I know of the specs of the factory ECU, there is enough space to double the rom or flash that is loaded via ECUFLash. COBB's handheld proved that. There is the flash that is stored in hard memory, and the flash that is stored in ram. I could be missing something on those specifics, but none the less, the space is there. Can it be a small enough foot print in code to keep the ecu from stressing on the extra read and seek time? It seems that even though the room is there in the hardware storage, are you able to scale the flash memory to include the extra addresses? It sounds as if you are, but just a toss out for geeks. Thats where hardware electronic failure starts...heat.
Last edited by Raceghost; Sep 30, 2009 at 11:45 PM.