Notices
ECU Flash

Tephra v7 9653 thottle hang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 08:51 AM
  #91  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
So do more people have updates? Does this seem to be the correct fix. If its tested to be the complete fix, then it should be stickied
It helped considerably.

d
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #92  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by donour
It helped considerably.

d
Thanks.

can others please confirm or deny that the fix posted by simple lancer works.

So far donor & Routybouty said it works.

If we get a couple more confirmations, then we can have the first post updated with the fix, so its easy for others to find.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 11:47 PM
  #93  
D-VO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: kissimmee FL.
The new settings worked. Thanks a lot!
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #94  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by D-VO
The new settings worked. Thanks a lot!
What ones exactly?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2009 | 12:11 AM
  #95  
D-VO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: kissimmee FL.
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
What ones exactly?
Ya know I was pretty sure it was fast freddy's on this thread, but now I can't find it. Let me look around a bit, and I'll get back to you.

*EDIT* Oops sorry got my threads confused. It was in Simple_Lancer's post:

- ISCV Demand RPM Adder [rpm > 4500, load > 170, speed > 12 mph] and
- ISCV Demand RPM Adder (Moderated by Baro, IATS) (FFFF6EA8) (sub_204B6) [sub_1EFC0]
must be zeroed out.

Last edited by D-VO; Nov 13, 2009 at 12:23 AM. Reason: update
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #96  
rolly1818's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 2
From: Trinidad
anyone have this for 88570008 (JDM IX)?

or can anyone help me define it?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #97  
D-VO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: kissimmee FL.
Originally Posted by rolly1818
anyone have this for 88570008 (JDM IX)?

or can anyone help me define it?
Check your PM's.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #98  
mutex12's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Hi all, I've been trying to find these iscv demand tables for the jdm 93660005 rom.

Normally I use shared tables to determine 9653 -> 9366 memory offsets to find where they live but I haven't found anything.
I also searched the 9366 rom for some 9653 table data using a hex editor but nothing turned up.

If someone has them can please post/pm. Much appreciated.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 09:14 PM
  #99  
ziad's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne
guys i am moving from 96260009 to this rom and noticed that the MAF Compensation table is quite a fair bit different between the two roms... should i copy my MAFC to 9653?? i did the two things that simple_lancer said and do not have throttle hang.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #100  
D-VO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: kissimmee FL.
Originally Posted by ziad
guys i am moving from 96260009 to this rom and noticed that the MAF Compensation table is quite a fair bit different between the two roms... should i copy my MAFC to 9653?? i did the two things that simple_lancer said and do not have throttle hang.
The 96580706 is scaled in G/S as opposed to the factory ROMs which are scaled in units.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #101  
steadly2004's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnton, NC
Originally Posted by phenem
I noticed the same, my car now doesn't hang near as bad, almost 1/2 of a second now, compared to 3-5 seconds before and doesn't go rich much 12-13 AFR then goes to normal. Here are the values I changed:

That last table is labeled "decel fuel cut retard"

Is that referenceing timing or does anybody know? The term 'retard' is usually used with timing stuff. Or is it something else?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #102  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by steadly2004
That last table is labeled "decel fuel cut retard"

Is that referenceing timing or does anybody know? The term 'retard' is usually used with timing stuff. Or is it something else?
It is timing retard.

Also i recommend leaving it at the 10 value and not 0'ing it out. Timing retard on lift off is good.

I would say try simple_lancer fix in theis thread (about a page or two back). Its the most simple, and changes the least tables. If it doesnt work, then move onto the other fixes.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #103  
ziad's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne
agreed the two tables for RPM Demand fix works for me.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #104  
steadly2004's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnton, NC
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
It is timing retard.

Also i recommend leaving it at the 10 value and not 0'ing it out. Timing retard on lift off is good.

I would say try simple_lancer fix in theis thread (about a page or two back). Its the most simple, and changes the least tables. If it doesnt work, then move onto the other fixes.
I did that, zero'd out the RPM ADDER tables, and it helped alot, but is still there a bit.

I wonder if there is a TPS referenced table for the ISCV that we missed along the way?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 05:43 PM
  #105  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by steadly2004
I did that, zero'd out the RPM ADDER tables, and it helped alot, but is still there a bit.

I wonder if there is a TPS referenced table for the ISCV that we missed along the way?
a couple things..

Is your Idle stepper table stock or modified?

Are your decel fuel tables stock or zero'd?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 PM.