Evolved Member
Quote:
It helped considerably.Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
So do more people have updates? Does this seem to be the correct fix. If its tested to be the complete fix, then it should be stickied
d
Quote:
d
Thanks.Originally Posted by donour
It helped considerably.d
can others please confirm or deny that the fix posted by simple lancer works.
So far donor & Routybouty said it works.
If we get a couple more confirmations, then we can have the first post updated with the fix, so its easy for others to find.
Quote:
What ones exactly?Originally Posted by D-VO
The new settings worked. Thanks a lot!
Evolved Member
Quote:
Ya know I was pretty sure it was fast freddy's on this thread, but now I can't find it. Let me look around a bit, and I'll get back to you.Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
What ones exactly?
*EDIT* Oops sorry got my threads confused. It was in Simple_Lancer's post:
- ISCV Demand RPM Adder [rpm > 4500, load > 170, speed > 12 mph] and
- ISCV Demand RPM Adder (Moderated by Baro, IATS) (FFFF6EA8) (sub_204B6) [sub_1EFC0]
must be zeroed out.
Registered User
anyone have this for 88570008 (JDM IX)?
or can anyone help me define it?
or can anyone help me define it?
Evolved Member
Quote:
or can anyone help me define it?
Check your PM's.Originally Posted by rolly1818
anyone have this for 88570008 (JDM IX)?or can anyone help me define it?
Newbie
Hi all, I've been trying to find these iscv demand tables for the jdm 93660005 rom.
Normally I use shared tables to determine 9653 -> 9366 memory offsets to find where they live but I haven't found anything.
I also searched the 9366 rom for some 9653 table data using a hex editor but nothing turned up.
If someone has them can please post/pm. Much appreciated.
Normally I use shared tables to determine 9653 -> 9366 memory offsets to find where they live but I haven't found anything.
I also searched the 9366 rom for some 9653 table data using a hex editor but nothing turned up.
If someone has them can please post/pm. Much appreciated.
Evolved Member
guys i am moving from 96260009 to this rom and noticed that the MAF Compensation table is quite a fair bit different between the two roms... should i copy my MAFC to 9653?? i did the two things that simple_lancer said and do not have throttle hang.
Evolved Member
Quote:
The 96580706 is scaled in G/S as opposed to the factory ROMs which are scaled in units.Originally Posted by ziad
guys i am moving from 96260009 to this rom and noticed that the MAF Compensation table is quite a fair bit different between the two roms... should i copy my MAFC to 9653?? i did the two things that simple_lancer said and do not have throttle hang.
Evolving Member
Quote:
That last table is labeled "decel fuel cut retard" Originally Posted by phenem
I noticed the same, my car now doesn't hang near as bad, almost 1/2 of a second now, compared to 3-5 seconds before and doesn't go rich much 12-13 AFR then goes to normal. Here are the values I changed:
Is that referenceing timing or does anybody know? The term 'retard' is usually used with timing stuff. Or is it something else?
Quote:
Is that referenceing timing or does anybody know? The term 'retard' is usually used with timing stuff. Or is it something else?
It is timing retard.Originally Posted by steadly2004
That last table is labeled "decel fuel cut retard" Is that referenceing timing or does anybody know? The term 'retard' is usually used with timing stuff. Or is it something else?
Also i recommend leaving it at the 10 value and not 0'ing it out. Timing retard on lift off is good.
I would say try simple_lancer fix in theis thread (about a page or two back). Its the most simple, and changes the least tables. If it doesnt work, then move onto the other fixes.
Evolving Member
Quote:
Also i recommend leaving it at the 10 value and not 0'ing it out. Timing retard on lift off is good.
I would say try simple_lancer fix in theis thread (about a page or two back). Its the most simple, and changes the least tables. If it doesnt work, then move onto the other fixes.
I did that, zero'd out the RPM ADDER tables, and it helped alot, but is still there a bit. Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
It is timing retard.Also i recommend leaving it at the 10 value and not 0'ing it out. Timing retard on lift off is good.
I would say try simple_lancer fix in theis thread (about a page or two back). Its the most simple, and changes the least tables. If it doesnt work, then move onto the other fixes.
I wonder if there is a TPS referenced table for the ISCV that we missed along the way?
Quote:
I wonder if there is a TPS referenced table for the ISCV that we missed along the way?
a couple things..Originally Posted by steadly2004
I did that, zero'd out the RPM ADDER tables, and it helped alot, but is still there a bit. I wonder if there is a TPS referenced table for the ISCV that we missed along the way?
Is your Idle stepper table stock or modified?
Are your decel fuel tables stock or zero'd?