Notices
ECU Flash

launch maps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #16  
Chris Moore's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Creston, Iowa
Originally Posted by recompile
This isn't thoroughly tested, but seems to build 15+ psi rather quickly. Using Timing Retard Limit mod to get -20. Stationary rev limit is at 6500
Care to share what number value your using with the timing retard limit mod to reach -20?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #17  
project_skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Actually this was a feature in V6.

My main interest is building boost and then transitioning to the main maps without tons of knock that would affect timing post launch.

Nice to see this thread has gotten some interest now. I'll post mine after I log results from it to compare.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #18  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
If a stock power Evo can spin the tires... what would a big power Evo do with a ton of boost out of the hole? Isn't traction the issue for most people, not more power?

I've always dialed in NO ignition retard on my launch control settings with my autronic sm4 our of fear of breaking drivetrain parts. I get 1.6's with a 1.5 here and there. I even use a relay to my boost control solenoid to get less boost before a certain vehicle speed. So wanting to leave from 0 mph with a ton of boost seems odd to me. I'm sure if the drivetrain holds together and your on slicks and a well prep'd track you might cut a 1.3 or sumpin but is it worth the harrasment unless your a shop car?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #19  
rolly1818's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 2
From: Trinidad
Originally Posted by crcain
If a stock power Evo can spin the tires... what would a big power Evo do with a ton of boost out of the hole? Isn't traction the issue for most people, not more power?

I've always dialed in NO ignition retard on my launch control settings with my autronic sm4 our of fear of breaking drivetrain parts. I get 1.6's with a 1.5 here and there. I even use a relay to my boost control solenoid to get less boost before a certain vehicle speed. So wanting to leave from 0 mph with a ton of boost seems odd to me. I'm sure if the drivetrain holds together and your on slicks and a well prep'd track you might cut a 1.3 or sumpin but is it worth the harrasment unless your a shop car?

that video is hilarious! only in the caribbean!!!!

i want to test this - negative timing VS standard timing (8-10*)

some people say the retard is better others say the other.

i need V7 to test though i hate the knock the settings generate!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 04:07 AM
  #20  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 10
From: New Hampshire, USA
Originally Posted by Chris Moore
Care to share what number value your using with the timing retard limit mod to reach -20?
255/255 works for me on the IX ROM. As you can see, it builds 13 psi in less than a second

Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 04:57 AM
  #21  
hediki12's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 522
Likes: 2
From: mnt vernon ny
Originally Posted by recompile
255/255 works for me on the IX ROM. As you can see, it builds 13 psi in less than a second

...... wow ur cars moves 1257 hz of air @ 4687 rpm...... thats what my car does by red line. lol!!!! i realy need a new turbo... i hate this stock t25..
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #22  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
Logic....I followed your trend and made my launch maps. I have an FP Green and Revolvers so I had to tweek the fuel launch table too. I will post pics here soon.

Paul
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #23  
bnice01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Hurlburt Field, FL
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Actually this was a feature in V6.

My main interest is building boost and then transitioning to the main maps without tons of knock that would affect timing post launch.

Nice to see this thread has gotten some interest now. I'll post mine after I log results from it to compare.
Just curious since I have no way of testing V7 since I am deployed but is there a retard timing limit in tephra v7?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #24  
project_skyline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Yes, recompile just removed it on his maps I believe.

My comment was in reference to launch maps which were in tephra V6.

I can't comment on V7 i haven't yet loaded it into my car yet, i will today.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #25  
Routybouty's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
I wonder if the recover time is in a table somewhere. If we could lessen the time it waits before resuming power again I bet we could get some nasty boost quick!

On another note if I just get on the 2-step and then let off without launching my idle will stumble for a bit. It drops maybe 200rpm or so for about 10 seconds. My launch maps are identical below 3500rpm. With V7 that is.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 08:42 PM
  #26  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
As promised.....blurry for a reason.

Name:  LaunchMaps.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  54.4 KB
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 09:14 PM
  #27  
Chris Moore's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Creston, Iowa
Originally Posted by Appauldd
As promised.....blurry for a reason.

I would smooth out the fuel map more if it was mine.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 09:44 PM
  #28  
rolly1818's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 2
From: Trinidad
y not change the entire map to the desired AFR and timing?

it is not gonna affect your pull off if u set the parameters correctly.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #29  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
To change the entire map wouldn't allow for smooth transition in fuel and timing. I believe that by doing that you may induce knock.

Remember....RPM has to increase to the set 2 step setting. Wouldn't you want it to do so smoothly and effectively?
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 05:38 AM
  #30  
rolly1818's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 2
From: Trinidad
Originally Posted by Appauldd
To change the entire map wouldn't allow for smooth transition in fuel and timing. I believe that by doing that you may induce knock.

Remember....RPM has to increase to the set 2 step setting. Wouldn't you want it to do so smoothly and effectively?
ohhhhh...good one....
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:16 AM.