Notices
ECU Flash

Virtual Dyno - Standalone Software

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 02:02 AM
  #166  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
No break up, no slipping. Just rips. 500whp feels good. Def. Gotta dyno it. Maybe this weekend. That way I can get a good comparison vs what the dynojet says.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 03:26 AM
  #167  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
im thinking its something to do with sd manipulating the logs or something. If the cars pulling clean I highly doubt theres any issues. Pull some fuel out in your map tho try to keep it less lean in the areas i said in here. you wont lose any power so dont worry. better to be safe then sorry.

does your a/f change a lot from daytime vs night or no? im curious because i see you're using a aftermarket iat sensor and not the fuel temp for your sd.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 03:29 AM
  #168  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
bbarnhill can you please make the next release so you can store default car settings so you dont have to keep changing the values each time you load a log? that is the only complaint i have with the prog other then that its perfect.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 05:09 AM
  #169  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
With SD my A/F is the same day or night. With my maf it would change.

Back on topic.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 05:14 AM
  #170  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by Evoryder
With SD my A/F is the same day or night. With my maf it would change.

Back on topic.
What IAT sensor you have? GM? thats good to know.. Makes me want to switch to SD now even more and not use the fuel temp sensor.. that sensor must be helping your ecu control the compensation better.. the maf sucks at doing it.

btw i donated $20 to both virtual dyno and VDR.. i encourage everyone else to do the same .. these guys deserve paid for their hard work, knowledge, and coding!

You can pm me if you dont want to keep putting off topic in the thread Evoryder.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 03:34 PM
  #171  
nonschlont's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Ca
not sure what the deal is, but Ive tried to DL the 1.0.0.2 a couple times now, and it will NOT install. Tried both links. Norton is saying its a medium risk and discarding the install...
I go into see what the threat is, and there is none...
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #172  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
probably because you're downloading an .exe file type and your antivirus is too up tight.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #173  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
Uptight antivirus software FTL
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 08:32 PM
  #174  
nonschlont's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Ca
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
probably because you're downloading an .exe file type and your antivirus is too up tight.
that was exactly it! Got it. Thank you!
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 08:41 AM
  #175  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
1.0.0.3 will be released VERY shortly due to a few bugs introduced in 1.0.0.2
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #176  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
1.0.0.3 will be released VERY shortly due to a few bugs introduced in 1.0.0.2
Get used to that lol. How do you think I got up to version 5.71 so quickly? Once you start adding more features, it can become a breeding ground for oversights and human errors all over the place. When you finally get it working the way you want it, it will look nothing like you want it to, then you'll want to start over fresh so its not patched together so much. Its a vicious cycle Just be sure to comment the HECK out of your work cuz in 3 months, you'll feel lost looking at all of the revisions you squeezed in.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #177  
3gEclipseTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: ma
I just thought of something, when I was tuning I didnt have my front bumper on. How much will that effect the drag coeffient?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #178  
itzwolf's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
1.0.0.3 will be released VERY shortly due to a few bugs introduced in 1.0.0.2
How can I get them AEM style logs to you for implementation of that feature to directly read from them?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #179  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by 3gEclipseTurbo
I just thought of something, when I was tuning I didnt have my front bumper on. How much will that effect the drag coeffient?
maybe a little but I wouldn't think it'd skew your numbers by a great margin. If it was a formula 1 car missing its bumper....that would throw things off lol.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #180  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
new problem.

I had a car that only reached 99% when going WOT, instead of 100%. I see this ever now and then. Regardless, since the TPS wasnt at 100%, the virtual dyno wouldnt plot the log.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 PM.