Notices
ECU Flash

Speed Density 2.0 (3D VE Tables, Baro)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 05:40 PM
  #631  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by evo8426
I use the Mitsu 3 bar on my car and use the 8859 ROM. I do have settings for the Omni on another computer and can send your way later today.
That would be great!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 05:45 PM
  #632  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning

Evoscan has a glitch where it claims that one parameter needs to be above another, even though it already is correct. It says it every time I log VE but once I click 'OK', it logs fine.

-Jamie
Jamie

Thanks for your help BTW! You've been a great resource for me and a stand up guy!

I had the same problem with EvoScan. I fixed it by running the offline test mode. Close out of the program and open it. It was fine after that.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 05:59 PM
  #633  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
Originally Posted by 10isace
Jamie

Thanks for your help BTW! You've been a great resource for me and a stand up guy!
Thanks for the kind words. I'm glad to help when I can. Its hard to try and toss a few bones to you guys without giving away the things that keep food on my kids plate lol. I'm one of the few pro tuners that actually contribute to this section these days for that same reason. Most of them just troll for info and give nothing back. I kinda leave 'clues' all over the forum and the smart guys will pick them up and collect them

-Jamie
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 08:20 PM
  #634  
Biggy VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 3
From: Russia, Moscow
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
To first confirm its heatsoak and not the startup tables that need attention, you need to log the IAT readings to confirm its truly heatsoaking before you start the car under the conditions you mentioned.

-Jamie
It's about -5 C* here. Whenever I cruise or idle MUT11 shows ~5-15*C. In the warm start situation I log ~35-40*C.

The car fires right up, revs to ~1800rpm, falls down to ~1000, and begins to run really lean. My LC1 shows 20-ish AFR, the car lopes really bad and almost dies.

If I help it with throttle, it takes about a minute to stabilize rpm and afr. Mut11 slowly falls down to 25-ish and AFR comes back to 14-15-ish.

I have tried raising MAF Comp vs Coolant Temp. But that didn't help at all.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 08:32 PM
  #635  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
Where is your IAT sensor mounted currently? You don't want to adjust MAF comp vs. coolant temp for this issue as it will affect the entire tune when there isn't a heat soak condition. Adjusting the Post-cranking IPW added table will help as it stabilizes a bit but the only way to really resolve it is to move the IAT sensor. Anything else will basically effect things when the heat soak issue goes away after airflow cools the sensor.

-Jamie

Last edited by Dynotech Tuning; Feb 24, 2013 at 08:36 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2013 | 04:24 AM
  #636  
Biggy VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 3
From: Russia, Moscow
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
Where is your IAT sensor mounted currently? You don't want to adjust MAF comp vs. coolant temp for this issue as it will affect the entire tune when there isn't a heat soak condition. Adjusting the Post-cranking IPW added table will help as it stabilizes a bit but the only way to really resolve it is to move the IAT sensor. Anything else will basically effect things when the heat soak issue goes away after airflow cools the sensor.

-Jamie
My GM IAT sensor is mounted in my inlet manifold, next to my JDM Map, as on JDM Evo9. I am also concerned about meth nozzles, as I have two of them. Both are in the AMS short upper IC piping. One is 10" from the throttle and another is ~12" from the IC.
Where should I put my GM IAT? Is it bad if IAT sensor will be exposed to meth?

Is that correct table to adjust? I have stock values in it

Code:
<table name="Injector Cranking Enrichment IPW Adder (Main)" scaling="TimeInjCranking" type="2D" address="56ae" category="Main Map Fuel Settings" level="2"> <table name="Coolant Temperature" scaling="Temp" type="Y Axis" address="67bc" elements="9"/> </table>
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2013 | 05:41 AM
  #637  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
Ideally you want the sensor mounted on the lowest part of the upper intercooler pipe, just after the outlet of the FMIC. Be sure to have the sensor mounted on the top half of the tubing so any moisture in the pipe doesn't puddle in the sensor, just like is recommended for a Wideband sensor.

Look up the thread I recently created labeled 'Fuel and ISCV Startup Tables' or something like that.

-Jamie
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2013 | 06:01 AM
  #638  
Biggy VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 3
From: Russia, Moscow
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
Ideally you want the sensor mounted on the lowest part of the upper intercooler pipe, just after the outlet of the FMIC. Be sure to have the sensor mounted on the top half of the tubing so any moisture in the pipe doesn't puddle in the sensor, just like is recommended for a Wideband sensor.

Look up the thread I recently created labeled 'Fuel and ISCV Startup Tables' or something like that.

-Jamie
Where should I put IAT relatively to meth nozzles?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2013 | 06:19 PM
  #639  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
Originally Posted by Biggy VIII
Where should I put IAT relatively to meth nozzles?
Before meth or water injection nozzles, ideally in the exact location I had suggested in the previous post.

-Jamie
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2013 | 10:32 PM
  #640  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
Here is the ideal location for minimal heatsoak. Try and keep the bung on the top half of the circumference of the piping so moisture doesn't puddle in the sensor.



-Jamie
Attached Thumbnails Speed Density 2.0 (3D VE Tables, Baro)-image.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2013 | 11:35 PM
  #641  
Biggy VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 3
From: Russia, Moscow
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
Here is the ideal location for minimal heatsoak. Try and keep the bung on the top half of the circumference of the piping so moisture doesn't puddle in the sensor.



-Jamie

Thank you!

My meth nozzle is placed over there just a few inches further from the IC. I'll check if I have enough place or if I have to move meth nozzle.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2013 | 10:27 AM
  #642  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
You would want your meth nozzle closer to the throttlebody if you are actually running meth. You're basically just coating the entire UICP with liquid and not as much is making it to the cylinders. If its just water to cool the air charge, that would be fine. I generally place the meth nozzle on the 90* bend just before the throttlebody so it's spraying directly at the throttlebody.

-Jamie
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 03:26 AM
  #643  
Biggy VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 3
From: Russia, Moscow
Ok, I figured out that my start-up issues are most likely not heatsoak-related as I am having the same issue on cold starts.

I have tried modifying Post cranking IPW adder, but didn't get any noticable improvement.
Then I tried setting the IPW Multiplier vs Coolant Temp much higher than stock and finished at:
1.99219
1.89844
1.79688
1.74219
1.59375
1.44531
1.35156
1.25
1

That gave me noticable improvement in AFR, but it was still a bit lean and didn't solve that issue on warm starts.
I've made a log of a cold start where you can see idle revs fluctuations and unstable AFR. Hope someone can presuppose the root of the problem.

I am also thinking if my IAT calibration is set correctly? How should i check it?
Attached Files

Last edited by Biggy VIII; Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 11:03 AM
  #644  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by Biggy VIII
Ok, I figured out that my start-up issues are most likely not heatsoak-related as I am having the same issue on cold starts.

I have tried modifying Post cranking IPW adder, but didn't get any noticable improvement.
Then I tried setting the IPW Multiplier vs Coolant Temp much higher than stock and finished at:
1.99219
1.89844
1.79688
1.74219
1.59375
1.44531
1.35156
1.25
1

That gave me noticable improvement in AFR, but it was still a bit lean and didn't solve that issue on warm starts.
I've made a log of a cold start where you can see idle revs fluctuations and unstable AFR. Hope someone can presuppose the root of the problem.

I am also thinking if my IAT calibration is set correctly? How should i check it?
I looked at your log. I'd need to see the ISC Steps and WB too.

Your steps are probably going up and down causing it to run lean for a second then fuel catches up. Then steps are probably going down because idle is past target idle. Then idle gets too low and steps and fuel are trying to catch up, but it's too late and it dies.

What's your target idle table and idle error table look like? This doesn't exactly apply to your situation, but it may help a little: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...cv-tables.html post #2. Since it starts and idles for 15 seconds before the fluctuating it may not help, but a great read nevertheless. Thanks Jamie for this!

I can take a look at your rom if you want. My email is: 10isace@gmail.com

Last edited by 10isace; Mar 4, 2013 at 01:25 PM. Reason: spelling errors
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 11:10 AM
  #645  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
I recommend leaving the last 2 rows set to 1.00 for that table. I consider 171*F (77*C) and higher to be at operating temp and doesnt need enrichment anymore.

There is a setting that adds a certain amount of ISCV demand when rpm drops below 500rpm, this is probably what you are seeing (I didnt look at the log).

-Jamie
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:37 AM.