Notices
ECU Flash

General non-information about factory ALS

Old Mar 19, 2013 | 10:07 PM
  #691  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
So since that article that I just linked to.. ive done a fair bit of digging on the turbo lag systems used in road racing. To my suprise many cars currently use the fresh air systems now. My google fu is gaining strength!

They appear to use a very common 4 runner injection set up just like the WRC cars...
Attached Thumbnails General non-information about factory ALS-asp13-16.jpg   General non-information about factory ALS-asp13-13.jpg  
Old Mar 20, 2013 | 04:36 AM
  #692  
tunermt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 345
Likes: 35
From: missoula,phoenix,seoul
nice find
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #693  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
Hey any insight on a valve? I might go back to the tial but I am open to new ideas. Did you use a check valve in the cold plumbing to keep pressure from entering the charge pipe when it ignites in the exhaust manifold? (Reversion ) I was getting significant reversion under transient states.
Old Mar 23, 2013 | 01:49 PM
  #694  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...&page_number=1

Mm Honda wtcc als..
Old Mar 23, 2013 | 08:54 PM
  #695  
tunermt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 345
Likes: 35
From: missoula,phoenix,seoul
oh yes, that is SEXY
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 05:10 PM
  #696  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
Wow the dsps valve is £858. At least 1500 usd

Looks like ill stick to the TiAl

Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Apr 2, 2013 at 05:13 PM.
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 08:34 PM
  #697  
tunermt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 345
Likes: 35
From: missoula,phoenix,seoul
Motorsports budget

reminds me of the time we set up an Asian touring car (Honda DC5) with a 40K+ xtrac transmission, 16K+ intake manifold etc... Didn't realize how fast a Honda can tern into a 6 figure car!
Motorsports budgets can get pretty wild pretty fast to say the least.
What, 1500 fresh are valve, 1700 waste gate, 6k turbo, 8-10K manifold and you've dropped 20K plus in a heart beat on only part of the turbo system.

An idea for you 211ratsbud, you mentioned you're getting some exhaust re-circulation into the IC pipe (ALS acting as an EGR) not that this is a terrible thing depending on when it happens of course.
You may get better results if you use positive pressure vs vacuum to actuate AND hold the valve closed. (2, 3 port solenoids one for top one for bottom port usually does the trick nicely and gives plenty of control) Issue is not many ECU's have the ability so you have to adapt some new methods/gizmos.
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 02:53 AM
  #698  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
That's where the Arduino comes in. Problem is the grimmspeed bcs I wanted to use is very restrictive like a coffee straw. I looked at new Mac valves with a little more flow because the tial has a large chamber to fill and uses larger fittings on it.

Securing an asp right now so when that money comes around ill pick back up on this some. Although I do need tires and wheels first. I'll see.
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 08:46 PM
  #699  
tunermt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 345
Likes: 35
From: missoula,phoenix,seoul
Ah yes a big restriction in the solenoid doesn't seem to play nice with external waste gates. The MAC solenoids have been our go to option for a while now, i don't believe you will be disappointed with them
Old Apr 18, 2013 | 07:55 PM
  #700  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
Yay v-band flanges are here!

If I get back from securing the crazy house from the ghost hunters ( no joke) in time ill be at the machine shop.

Having a plug that fits inside the inlet band with 4-5/8 holes. Manifold is still up in the air yet lol.
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 02:53 PM
  #701  
foxbat's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 926
Likes: 15
From: UAE
Some basic video that I just found:

Looking at the diagram, it shows that SAS (bypass) antilag doesn't require a throttle kick, in fact, it looks like a kick would work against it!
We need air + fuel
Air:
Does SAS physically capable of delivering enough air?
Does the software allow for enough sas operating time?
Does the BOV interfere with sas, do we have to cancel it?
Fuel:
Without a kick, fuel will have to be solely provided through the fuel map, -ve timing should help in fuel build up.
Does the fuel table provide enough fuel if we switch to full OL & insert rich values in low load areas?
Is the current -ve timing limit good enough to help build enough fuel amount?
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 02:54 PM
  #702  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
Already have that in my favorites lol

Those are questions I need to solve. Some I think I can answer already but I haven't done what I want yet to provide evidence.

Blow off valve will be cancelled when sas is active, because the sas does t open immediately so I want to use the bov to prevent stall, but once the sas activates it will switch to a boost reference to hold it shut.

Ignition retard alone may be sufficient, and with my jack experiment. It was good enough, however only my speculation says it will be enough. I'm awaiting to build a new sas manifold.

Fueling from other anti lag set ups doesn't seem to be as overly rich as we all like to say. Fuel seems to be from 12-13.5 ranges. Any insight here Foxbat would be appreciated. As far as traditional kicker fueling

Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Apr 28, 2013 at 03:02 PM.
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 03:14 PM
  #703  
foxbat's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 926
Likes: 15
From: UAE
We don't want a kick, if the throttle is opened then pressure would escape the other way around!
Did you try to switch to full OL & enrich low load cells (same as -ve timing area)? Would the ECU comply?

I'm almost convinced that SAS antilag doesn't require neither a kick nor an ignition cut, but is it meant to be as aggressive as ignition cut ALS?

We need a better understanding of SAS ecu control & we need to work on the fuel part.
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 03:30 PM
  #704  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
Not meant to be as aggressive afaik due to not charging the intake manifold.. I was curious to know the throttle kick fuel requirements. i was registering afrs in the 12 via wideband in the downpipe. I would suspect that tail pipe afr could be leaner and still have enough in the manifold.

I would bet that similar if not greater shaft speed could be obtained when considering setups. I wouldn't be shocked of the inlet mani presssure being raised up due to either iac settings or boost peeking through

I'm actually trying to buy a turbo speed sensor from Fp now.

Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Apr 28, 2013 at 03:48 PM.
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 07:12 PM
  #705  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
Picked up a dnp stock frame turbo manifold from hiboost to modify for my current bigger sas pipe work

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: General non-information about factory ALS



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:11 PM.