Notices
ECU Flash

High Load Figures, 368!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2018 | 03:24 PM
  #1  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Exclamation High Load Figures, 368!?

My car is basically a stock evo 03, mods are listed on my sign.
redline AFRs go all the way to 10.4, doing 23psi as of now till i replace my actuator and tune for 25psi
why are my load figures this high? is it normal? attached is my current rom and the newest log.
Attached Files
File Type: csv
FinalLog7-1-18.csv (37.4 KB, 0 views)
File Type: bin
FinalRom7-1-18.bin (256.0 KB, 0 views)
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2018 | 11:19 AM
  #2  
Biggiesacks's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,690
Likes: 708
From: West Coast
Boost leak test?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2018 | 01:05 PM
  #3  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
If the car is running a MAF, higher than expected load can indicate a boost leak.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2018 | 01:16 PM
  #4  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Nope, no boost leak, did a boost leak test, fixed all of them and it held boost properly
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2018 | 01:16 PM
  #5  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Originally Posted by TariqEvo
Nope, no boost leak, did a boost leak test, fixed all of them and it held boost properly
load is still that high
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2018 | 12:49 PM
  #6  
foxbat's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 926
Likes: 15
From: UAE
Which load parameter are you logging, 1byte, 2byte?

I just opened your log file, you're logging load 2byte, it might be a definition issue, log load 1byte, it might yield realistic figures.

Last edited by foxbat; Jul 4, 2018 at 12:56 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2018 | 07:51 AM
  #7  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Originally Posted by foxbat
Which load parameter are you logging, 1byte, 2byte?

I just opened your log file, you're logging load 2byte, it might be a definition issue, log load 1byte, it might yield realistic figures.
i copied the mut table properly and defined properly.
also, if the readings were incorrect, i would be able to get rid of knock at like 330 load by reducing timing and adding fuel.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2018 | 07:54 AM
  #8  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Originally Posted by TariqEvo

i copied the mut table properly and defined properly.
also, if the readings were incorrect, i would be able to get rid of knock at like 330 load by reducing timing and adding fuel.
I wouldnt* n yet I can
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 10:12 AM
  #9  
mines5's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 868
Likes: 23
From: Streets of willow
Tariq bhai this is definitely a rom issue.
Logged timing vs load is incorrect .
Check your TPS % also.
Switch to a well defined rom like 9653 or 9417 v7
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2018 | 01:51 PM
  #10  
todd6027's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 13
From: Ireland
compare your maf scaling and maf compensation tables to stock ones
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2018 | 03:49 AM
  #11  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Originally Posted by mines5
Tariq bhai this is definitely a rom issue.
Logged timing vs load is incorrect .
Check your TPS % also.
Switch to a well defined rom like 9653 or 9417 v7
I am currently on the process of switching to 96530706 V7.
but even logging with the tephramod brings such load figures, even with load 1 byte
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2018 | 03:50 AM
  #12  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Originally Posted by todd6027
compare your maf scaling and maf compensation tables to stock ones
maf compesation are all the same.
however, the stock maf scaling makes my car stutter coz it runs very very rich, talking 8s by redline
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 04:14 PM
  #13  
sandman121383's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 140
Likes: 3
From: Pa
What is your load factor? And also make sure the load factor in your rom matches evoscan.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2018 | 09:08 AM
  #14  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
Update: fix

the issue was innacurate load readings, I tested this out by putting a fuel cut at 250load,
and voila, the car did not cut fuel even at said "368" load.
that was with tephramod load 1b load factor of 1.8 both in the rom and in evoscan as well.

so I decided to give 2byte load a go, and that was the fix apparently.
now it reads upto like 220, thought that is less than what the car is really doing.
but I found a way to trace the tables with the timing values.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2018 | 09:13 AM
  #15  
TariqEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 7
From: Kenya
for some reason, my stock rom was not reading load at all and load 2 byte was bringing the high 360s as well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TariqEvo
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
10
Jul 10, 2018 06:16 AM
TariqEvo
ECU Flash
9
Mar 9, 2018 01:12 PM
blackevolution8
ECU Flash
3
Sep 14, 2011 04:20 AM
RedLanEVO
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
14
Nov 30, 2008 06:29 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 PM.