Notices
ECU Flash

Evo 5/6 25570100 & 25570300 Development Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2019 | 12:46 AM
  #1  
XxOLIVERxX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 6
From: Perth Australia
Evo 5/6 25570100 & 25570300 Development Thread

Hello everyone
This thread will be devoted to further developing the H8 based ecu.
Hitachi Renesas H8" MH7202F & MHF203FA CPUs.

Found in the following models: 1996-2002
-Lancer Evo 5 6
-Lancer/Mirage 4G93
-Pajero 4G93 and many more

25570100 = Ceddymods MAF version based on ralliart rom.
25570300 = Ceddymods SD

I have been testing both roms and have successfully setup the current tables to "convert" the evo rom to run on my test subject mirage 4g93 with h8 ecu.
fuel trims never stray from 4-5%, the performance compared to the standard 4g93 rom, the new maf rom is almost the same, with the added features of the ceddymod rom.
im very pleased to say it drives well considering that i have not accounted for the fact that there may be major code differences between a mirage and an evo.

however, there are a number of things iv discovered about the behaviour of these roms in my quest to "add features to an otherwise stock car"
me being pretty picky about drivability i wanted to ensure the setup can be tuned correctly before adding a turbo kit.
i feel that there are more corrections to control the fuel and timing that have not yet been defined and i wish to discuss with others with the knowledge to find them and finish this rom off once and for all!

My only concerns with MAF rom are:
-EVO6: boost control seems to be working but having issues with boost cut intermittent -10 timing and fuel cut even though all the fuel cut settings are turned off/raised to the max. not sure if iv set something wrong or there is an issue with the rom? i found the other BDEL and TWGDC tables after digging through xmls, added those and chnaged those to match, still having the issue. not sure why these were not previously defined.. missed maybe? disabled/null? not sure.

-Mirage 4G93: the low load driveability is sometimes not quite right, when getting on and off the throttle it isn't as smooth as the original rom..
despite this it still drives well enough to not complain too much, but i'm interested in finding out if there are tables that are used to adjust the fuel finer than what we currently have.

So i copied all my settings over to the SD rom. with a few exceptions. changed scaling and scaling/compensation until it was close to target at mid/high rpm wot. i then built my ve table by logging and adjusting manually cell by cell to get where i currently am.
however im now kinda stuck on a few issues.

Concerns with SD rom:

Idle control issues
randomly bounces between 850 and 950. doesn't seem to care what you set in the idle tables. even in closed loop it will not drop below 26 steps and this does not change with the jagged rpm so we can assume it is not the cause. i assume its something to do with closed loop or idle learning. cutting fuel or timing to change rpm...
why? i am unsure.
ISC steps are solid at 26 when warm and AFR is wandering slightly with rpm with no evidence of timing change, load or ve change. ipw will change slightly by a tiny amount sometimes when its hunting at its worst.
when idle stabilises it can achieve target idle afr for 5-20 seconds then the idle randomly goes up or drops and then it starts to swing the afr again, once it gets bad enough it will effect the kpa and will cause a change in ve which makes it worse. flattening this area makes it less noticeable.

Temperature corrections seem inconsistent with the car wanting to lean out above 40 degrees C.

im wondering if the implementation of the SD has somehow "damaged" the routine in ways that will always cause these issues?

i can post logs, XMLs and rom files to anyone that wants to test or help look into whats happening.

i have a few cars i can use for testing.
-stock ish evo 6 with 9 turbo. running on MAF Rom, will convert to SD soon
2 identical Mirages with 4G93 engine. one setup for SD, one for MAF.

iv researched endlessly trying to workout the cause and solution to these issues but im hoping to gather all the relevant info in one place!
if we can pull all the info together, port a few things over from other roms i think the H8 can be an awesome platform.

thanks for reading and i hope to hear back from some of you, hopefully we can build a little community since there isnt many people working with H8s at the current time

Last edited by XxOLIVERxX; Aug 22, 2025 at 11:04 AM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2019 | 05:33 AM
  #2  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Looks like a well laid out thread @XxOLIVERxX

Thanks for putting this together

Cheers
Reply
Old May 13, 2019 | 06:35 AM
  #3  
rjwkerkhof's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 53
Likes: 4
From: Apeldoorn
Originally Posted by XxOLIVERxX
Hello everyone
This thread will be devoted to further developing the H8 based ecu.
Hitachi Renesas H8" MH7202F & MHF203FA CPUs.

Found in the following models: 1996-2002
-Lancer Evo 5 6
-Lancer/Mirage 4G93
-Pajero 4G93 and many more

25570100 = Ceddymods MAF version based on ralliart rom.
25570300 = Ceddymods SD

I have been testing both roms and have successfully setup the current tables to "convert" the evo rom to run on my test subject mirage 4g93 with h8 ecu.
fuel trims never stray from 4-5%, the performance compared to the standard 4g93 rom, the new maf rom is almost the same, with the added features of the ceddymod rom.
im very pleased to say it drives well considering that i have not accounted for the fact that there may be major code differences between a mirage and an evo.

however, there are a number of things iv discovered about the behaviour of these roms in my quest to "add features to an otherwise stock car"
me being pretty picky about drivability i wanted to ensure the setup can be tuned correctly before adding a turbo kit.
i feel that there are more corrections to control the fuel and timing that have not yet been defined and i wish to discuss with others with the knowledge to find them and finish this rom off once and for all!

My only concerns with MAF rom are:
-EVO6: boost control seems to be working but having issues with boost cut intermittent -10 timing and fuel cut even though all the fuel cut settings are turned off/raised to the max. not sure if iv set something wrong or there is an issue with the rom? i found the other BDEL and TWGDC tables after digging through xmls, added those and chnaged those to match, still having the issue. not sure why these were not previously defined.. missed maybe? disabled/null? not sure.

-Mirage 4G93: the low load driveability is sometimes not quite right, when getting on and off the throttle it isn't as smooth as the original rom..
despite this it still drives well enough to not complain too much, but i'm interested in finding out if there are tables that are used to adjust the fuel finer than what we currently have.

So i copied all my settings over to the SD rom. with a few exceptions. (maf size) changed scaling and scaling adder/smoothing until it was close at mid/high rpm wot. i then built my ve table by logging and adjusting to get where i currently am.
however im now kinda stuck on a few issues. -cruising and idle is a massive headache!

Concerns with SD rom:
-Idle control issues, randomly bounces between 950 and 1150. doesn't seem to care what you set in the idle tables. even in closed loop it will not drop below 46 steps and does not change with the jagged rpm so we can assume it is not the cause. i assume its something to do with closed loop or idle learning. cutting spark or timing to change rpm.

ISC steps are solid at 46 and AFR is wandering with no evidence of timing change, load or ve change. ipw will change slightly by a tiny amount sometimes when it coughs/resets idle or whatever is happening.
when idle stabilises it can achieve target idle afr for 4-20 seconds and then either swings rich, or lean, sometimes both rapidly going from 12.5 to 16.5 when it calms down it hits the 14.7 i have tuned the ve table for and all is well. then the idle randomly goes up or drops and then it starts to swing the afr again, once it gets bad enough it will effect the kpa and will cause a change in ve which makes it worse.

After tuning the maf scaling adder in high hz i have target afr pretty much on point. above35% throttle it runs great. doesnt seem to do any of this afr swing stuff. until you start cruising at low load it will do the same as idle except while under partial throttle (15-30% approx) rich, target, lean, target, rich. over and over again.

So basically, if your never driving it slow ever, works fantastic. but trying to drive smoothly in a carpark or heavy traffic sucks.
long continuous straight roads you will feel a very slight jitter and the afr will swing occasionally, but adding 1% extra throttle usually kicks back to where it should be again.

off throttle acts as you would expect. can be tuned by ve table and it seems to follow it accurately on decel/zero tps. i have set it to not fuel at all and after a very long decel it did not kick on the injectors or anything odd that the normal settings wouldn't do.

so this brings me to the conclusion that the issue is defined to the following conditions.
-no throttle idle or part throttle cruise
-between load idle - 70ish. anything higher seems fine.

im wondering if the implementation of the SD has somehow "damaged" the routine in ways that will always cause this issue? and also maybe the idle control?

i can post logs, XMLs and rom files to anyone that wants to test or help look into whats happening.

i have a few cars i can use for testing.
stock ish evo 6 with 9turbo. will convert to SD soon
2 identical mirages with 4g93 engine. one setup for sd, one for maf.

iv researched endlessly trying to workout the cause and solution to these issues but im hoping to gather all the relevant info in one place!
if we can pull all the info together, port a few things over from other roms i think the H8 can be an awesome platform.

thanks for reading and i hope to hear back from some of you, hopefully we can build a little community since there isnt many people working with H8s at the current time
Already asked you for the complete logfile of your boostcut event with the E6
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2024 | 07:14 AM
  #4  
XxOLIVERxX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 6
From: Perth Australia
So im back working on this. trying to get it finished once and for all!

Can anyone see whats happening here? super rich 3000rpm that cant be tuned out!
Evo 5/6 Ralliart Rom 25570300 Ceddymod SD conversion.
Seems to be a hardcoded rich dip at 3000rpm.

i believe related to the fuel pump speed changeover.. could it be disabled?
i dont want it to mess with the fuel trims, the fuel pump speed is constant now, not using the high and low speed like stock.
screenshot 1 shows normal operation, as moving towards 3000rpm you see the problem arise. massive -16% fuel trim then goes back to normal
any help much appreciated!

also the idle still isnt fixed. it just bounces approx 50 to 100 rpm no matter what i set all the settings to, it just will not learn or stabilse consistenly. somtimes it will but shortly after starts hunting again. like it is permanently stuck in learning mode.... anyone else managed to work out why? stuck at 26 steps miniumum, and ossicaltes 750-850 when trying to set a consisentent 800rpm idle.
copying values from other roms that idle at 700 doesnt help either, the same thing happens just 650-750. seems like the rom itself has issues that need to be looked at in the code if anyone is interested in working it out.




start of rich dip
start of rich dip
near 3000 fuel trim has to remove -14% fuel to maintain correct afr.
near 3000 fuel trim has to remove -14% fuel to maintain correct afr.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2025 | 08:36 AM
  #5  
Kyle Cullum's Avatar
Newbie
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 10
Likes: 2
From: Japan
I'm running the MAF ROM on an Evo 6 ECU in my IV and haven't seen any issues with it like you described, if you'd like you can hit me up and I'll send you a copy of my my map and xml so you can compare. and I'd appreciate if you could do the same, maybe I'm missing a couple tables. It needs a professional's touch, but it's been good enough for daily driving the last couple of years.

As for the SD rom, one of the last things I read from Ceddy himself was that he never finished that ROM, but I have heard of people running SD on these older ECUs so I guess someone must've finished it.

Last edited by Kyle Cullum; Jan 31, 2025 at 08:42 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2025 | 04:32 AM
  #6  
XxOLIVERxX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 6
From: Perth Australia
hey man

im thinking the idle issue is related to 3 pin vs 4 pin tps but i could be wrong, i am yet to do testing as the 2 types of tps are not interchangeable.

as for the 3000rpm rich dip, and temperature correction.. i vaguely remember seeing ceddy talking about uncompensated load and load compensated by other tables, maybe the main SD calculation is hooked into the uncompensated load therefore making many of the corrections void.
i would say someone with hex coding knowledge would need to look at the SD Implementation to ensure its actually using a load factor that can be effected by these tables.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2025 | 02:56 AM
  #7  
-Dome-'s Avatar
Newbie
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
From: Germany
Lee Bell finished that SD rom and renamed it. But he dosent Sale. Some Guys have it.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2025 | 03:35 AM
  #8  
XxOLIVERxX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 6
From: Perth Australia
Ahh!
I have tried to speak with Lee previously but i didnt get any response.. any idea where i can get a copy to see if anything has improved?

Im very interested in anything related to this topic, so post away people, im keen to hear your experiences and thoughts on the SD versions
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
snowmastergt
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
2
Oct 4, 2019 08:03 AM
zulu989
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
1
Oct 9, 2011 10:26 AM
phenem
ECU Flash
167
Nov 7, 2010 05:26 AM
THUB
ECU Flash
8
Mar 26, 2010 09:27 AM
SEEnoEVO
ECU Flash
10
May 21, 2009 09:55 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:39 PM.