Adding load columns and RPM rows to maps
I think this resolution would be my ideal layout so 99% of users wouldn't ever need more resolution, IMO. I know Mellon is one of the highest stock MAF loaded cars right now and he's just at 500 now and like was mentioned, the built engines offered these days can reach 10K RPM. I know this is bigger than will probably be the final product, just wanted to throw it out there 
i think this resolution would be my ideal layout so 99% of users wouldn't ever need more resolution, imo. I know mellon is one of the highest stock maf loaded cars right now and he's just at 500 now and like was mentioned, the built engines offered these days can reach 10k rpm. I know this is bigger than will probably be the final product, just wanted to throw it out there
give me that!
I think this resolution would be my ideal layout so 99% of users wouldn't ever need more resolution, IMO. I know Mellon is one of the highest stock MAF loaded cars right now and he's just at 500 now and like was mentioned, the built engines offered these days can reach 10K RPM. I know this is bigger than will probably be the final product, just wanted to throw it out there
^ lol - that car is going to run like a ****, 9* @ 10500rpm and 500load... :P
OK I am ready for a tester.
If one of my usual 96530006 guys emails me I can send them a test ROM + XML
We can finalise the rpm/load points when everyone has time to think about it.
^Thanks Bryan - I havn't included it yet, but we will try and get all the maps filled out for the final version!
OK I am ready for a tester.
If one of my usual 96530006 guys emails me I can send them a test ROM + XML
We can finalise the rpm/load points when everyone has time to think about it.
^Thanks Bryan - I havn't included it yet, but we will try and get all the maps filled out for the final version!
Last edited by tephra; Oct 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM.
OMG!!!
I just jizzed in my pants.
I actually PREFER that the fuel and timing were using he same axis points since I want to tune THAT particular timing/load point to THAT specific fuel amount. God, this will be so sweet. I bet we can really get a lot more out of our tunes with this....keeping the knock monsters at bay.
Great work Tephra!!!
I planned ahead 
I don't know how possible it is, but if the axis used for the fuel are only called once, could you use those axis on the timing as well? Thus anything that used the timing axis originally will go unchanged and the fuel and timing axis will be locked together.
I know the fuel and timing use different values for loads, so maybe this isn't possible?
My concern about changing the timing axis is that what would happen when you get beyond the stock table area? For example, the stock low coolant timing map wouldn't have enough data to cover all the additional sites, would you end up pulling the wrong values out of the next adjacent map in the ROM?
Awesome work though and I hope the testing goes well. I'm not one of the guys that needs 500 for load, but I would love to not kill low end resolution just to get to 360 or so load.
I know the fuel and timing use different values for loads, so maybe this isn't possible?
My concern about changing the timing axis is that what would happen when you get beyond the stock table area? For example, the stock low coolant timing map wouldn't have enough data to cover all the additional sites, would you end up pulling the wrong values out of the next adjacent map in the ROM?
Awesome work though and I hope the testing goes well. I'm not one of the guys that needs 500 for load, but I would love to not kill low end resolution just to get to 360 or so load.
I don't know how possible it is, but if the axis used for the fuel are only called once, could you use those axis on the timing as well? Thus anything that used the timing axis originally will go unchanged and the fuel and timing axis will be locked together.
I know the fuel and timing use different values for loads, so maybe this isn't possible?
My concern about changing the timing axis is that what would happen when you get beyond the stock table area? For example, the stock low coolant timing map wouldn't have enough data to cover all the additional sites, would you end up pulling the wrong values out of the next adjacent map in the ROM?
Awesome work though and I hope the testing goes well. I'm not one of the guys that needs 500 for load, but I would love to not kill low end resolution just to get to 360 or so load.
I know the fuel and timing use different values for loads, so maybe this isn't possible?
My concern about changing the timing axis is that what would happen when you get beyond the stock table area? For example, the stock low coolant timing map wouldn't have enough data to cover all the additional sites, would you end up pulling the wrong values out of the next adjacent map in the ROM?
Awesome work though and I hope the testing goes well. I'm not one of the guys that needs 500 for load, but I would love to not kill low end resolution just to get to 360 or so load.
Yeah I am def going to keep the axis the same.
ie if you change the fuel rpm axis the ignition rpm axis will automatically change too
makes things a tiny bit more simple on my end as well.
btw i'm doing 96530706 first - so if someone wants to be a brave guinea pig let me know
ie if you change the fuel rpm axis the ignition rpm axis will automatically change too
makes things a tiny bit more simple on my end as well.
btw i'm doing 96530706 first - so if someone wants to be a brave guinea pig let me know
+ 10000000000
Im so excited about this, I cant wait! There are several places last time I was out tuning I was wishing I had more resolution!!! With this, those areas can be perfect now!!!
Tephra is an ECU code writing GOD!!!
(currently checking my $$$ flow, for donations!)
Im so excited about this, I cant wait! There are several places last time I was out tuning I was wishing I had more resolution!!! With this, those areas can be perfect now!!!
Tephra is an ECU code writing GOD!!!
(currently checking my $$$ flow, for donations!)
Here is the scaling for a 4 bar out to the edge of Kpa for us SD guys
Dont stare at the timing numbers too hard, nor my rpm scaling, as I will be changing it for the 2.2 I am sure
Dont stare at the timing numbers too hard, nor my rpm scaling, as I will be changing it for the 2.2 I am sure
Last edited by JohnBradley; Oct 2, 2009 at 09:32 AM.