Notices
ECU Flash

High Load Figures, 368!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2018, 03:24 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Exclamation High Load Figures, 368!?

My car is basically a stock evo 03, mods are listed on my sign.
redline AFRs go all the way to 10.4, doing 23psi as of now till i replace my actuator and tune for 25psi
why are my load figures this high? is it normal? attached is my current rom and the newest log.
Attached Files
File Type: csv
FinalLog7-1-18.csv (37.4 KB, 0 views)
File Type: bin
FinalRom7-1-18.bin (256.0 KB, 0 views)
Old Jul 3, 2018, 11:19 AM
  #2  
EvoM Community Team Leader
 
Biggiesacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,688
Received 704 Likes on 592 Posts
Boost leak test?
Old Jul 3, 2018, 01:05 PM
  #3  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,755
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
If the car is running a MAF, higher than expected load can indicate a boost leak.
Old Jul 3, 2018, 01:16 PM
  #4  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Nope, no boost leak, did a boost leak test, fixed all of them and it held boost properly
Old Jul 3, 2018, 01:16 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by TariqEvo
Nope, no boost leak, did a boost leak test, fixed all of them and it held boost properly
load is still that high
Old Jul 4, 2018, 12:49 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
 
foxbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 926
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Which load parameter are you logging, 1byte, 2byte?

I just opened your log file, you're logging load 2byte, it might be a definition issue, log load 1byte, it might yield realistic figures.

Last edited by foxbat; Jul 4, 2018 at 12:56 PM.
Old Jul 5, 2018, 07:51 AM
  #7  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by foxbat
Which load parameter are you logging, 1byte, 2byte?

I just opened your log file, you're logging load 2byte, it might be a definition issue, log load 1byte, it might yield realistic figures.
i copied the mut table properly and defined properly.
also, if the readings were incorrect, i would be able to get rid of knock at like 330 load by reducing timing and adding fuel.
Old Jul 5, 2018, 07:54 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by TariqEvo

i copied the mut table properly and defined properly.
also, if the readings were incorrect, i would be able to get rid of knock at like 330 load by reducing timing and adding fuel.
I wouldnt* n yet I can
Old Jul 14, 2018, 10:12 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
 
mines5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Streets of willow
Posts: 863
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Tariq bhai this is definitely a rom issue.
Logged timing vs load is incorrect .
Check your TPS % also.
Switch to a well defined rom like 9653 or 9417 v7
The following users liked this post:
TariqEvo (Jul 26, 2018)
Old Jul 15, 2018, 01:51 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
todd6027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,860
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
compare your maf scaling and maf compensation tables to stock ones
Old Jul 16, 2018, 03:49 AM
  #11  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mines5
Tariq bhai this is definitely a rom issue.
Logged timing vs load is incorrect .
Check your TPS % also.
Switch to a well defined rom like 9653 or 9417 v7
I am currently on the process of switching to 96530706 V7.
but even logging with the tephramod brings such load figures, even with load 1 byte
Old Jul 16, 2018, 03:50 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by todd6027
compare your maf scaling and maf compensation tables to stock ones
maf compesation are all the same.
however, the stock maf scaling makes my car stutter coz it runs very very rich, talking 8s by redline
Old Jul 25, 2018, 04:14 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
sandman121383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pa
Posts: 140
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What is your load factor? And also make sure the load factor in your rom matches evoscan.
Old Jul 26, 2018, 09:08 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Update: fix

the issue was innacurate load readings, I tested this out by putting a fuel cut at 250load,
and voila, the car did not cut fuel even at said "368" load.
that was with tephramod load 1b load factor of 1.8 both in the rom and in evoscan as well.

so I decided to give 2byte load a go, and that was the fix apparently.
now it reads upto like 220, thought that is less than what the car is really doing.
but I found a way to trace the tables with the timing values.
Old Jul 26, 2018, 09:13 AM
  #15  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
TariqEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kenya
Posts: 281
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
for some reason, my stock rom was not reading load at all and load 2 byte was bringing the high 360s as well.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TariqEvo
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
10
Jul 10, 2018 06:16 AM
TariqEvo
ECU Flash
9
Mar 9, 2018 01:12 PM
blackevolution8
ECU Flash
3
Sep 14, 2011 04:20 AM
RedLanEVO
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
14
Nov 30, 2008 06:29 PM



Quick Reply: High Load Figures, 368!?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:32 PM.