Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Official 2.3L stroker dynograph thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #46  
Meanmachine04's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Corning
Actually BR seems to be more affordable for the same thing.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #47  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
AMS stuff is rock solid I must say that and it looks nice
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #48  
Meanmachine04's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Corning
Yeah I have their 35R turbo kit and their intercooler and piping. I was thinking of a 2.3L stroker with their racing head that in their write up on their site is capable of maxing out at 10,500 RPMS. So for a little more money you could have nice low end torque and still rev high for a 1/4mile or whatever to increase a trap speed.

Am I going in the right direction to think this? IM not in a hurry or anything just kinda lookin around.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #49  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
I really don't like the 2.3L I rather have a 2.0 so I can use the rev's and the higher MPH, 2.3 is not so impressive if you ask me I seen 2.0 make the same even more power with almost the same tq.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #50  
Meanmachine04's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Corning
Wow thats insane. What turbo did he have? I think anything bigger than a 35R on a 2.0 would be hella laggy.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #51  
Philthy748's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000
I really don't like the 2.3L I rather have a 2.0 so I can use the rev's and the higher MPH, 2.3 is not so impressive if you ask me I seen 2.0 make the same even more power with almost the same tq.
I would agree with your comment for drag racing - but the 2.3 kicks a$$ for road racing and daily driving...
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #52  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Not impress with 2.3 that's all never was.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #53  
Meanmachine04's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Corning
Well my car isnt going to be an all out track car but maybe I should do a built 2.0 with AMS's race head? I like the idea of being able to rev to 10k rpms
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #54  
HunEVO6's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Hungary
Tomei 2.3L stroker

425 crank HP, 485 TQ

Tomei 2.3L stroker kit with bearings (86mm)
Tomei racing valve springs
Tomei head gasket
Ported cylinder head+ CNC machined
ARP bolts
HKS 272 cams
1000 cc injectors
walbro 255 FP
3" exhaust- no cat
custom airbox
GEMS ECU
EVO IX -16G turbo (bigger comes soooon)

Pls note how soon this car pulls- max TQ at 2800 rpm



Road performance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNydz7nxWDs
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 07:52 AM
  #55  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Originally Posted by HunEVO6
425 crank HP, 485 TQ

Pls note how soon this car pulls- max TQ at 2800 rpm



Road performance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNydz7nxWDs


WOW, Look @ that torque!! I cant wait to get some of that

Last edited by Aby@MIL.SPEC; Jun 14, 2009 at 07:54 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 12:00 AM
  #56  
norcalSRTrida's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: pleasanton, ca
Originally Posted by Aby@MIL.SPEC


WOW, Look @ that torque!! I cant wait to get some of that


just an FYI, that torque rating is in NM
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #57  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
Originally Posted by norcalSRTrida
just an FYI, that torque rating is in NM
still 480 ft/lbs
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 11:56 PM
  #58  
1sxyrxy's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, Ca
mmmm
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 01:00 AM
  #59  
reed32's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: pitts,ca
Originally Posted by norcalSRTrida
just an FYI, that torque rating is in NM
x2 nm numbers are usually a little inflated for the altitude
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #60  
big block ix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 745
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by whoop_ass
still 480 ft/lbs
nice!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23 PM.