Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Highest HP 4g63 engine (from 2007)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2012, 01:18 AM
  #1096  
Newbie
 
Beetspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe the difference with the ET's 4g63 engine is it runs less boost, has a little better VE and runs higher rpm, which alltogether yields less stress on crank bearings/block, so the block holds without using concrete fillings?

+ how good is your knock sensing/control?
Beetspeed is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2012, 08:51 AM
  #1097  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Beetspeed
Maybe the difference with the ET's 4g63 engine is it runs less boost, has a little better VE and runs higher rpm, which alltogether yields less stress on crank bearings/block, so the block holds without using concrete fillings?

+ how good is your knock sensing/control?
We have seen the blocks split with as little as 600whp if it hydraulics or gets any preignition. Anything above 900whp seems to split regularly enough a solid motor is needed with the 4G6x motors.
JohnBradley is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2012, 10:27 AM
  #1098  
Evolving Member
 
homemade wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Erland ***
I am curious why Spyros believes that bigger exhaust valves are necessary because even going from 32 to 34mm loses us power?
He wants to use 38mm inlet and 40mm outlet I read here.
Here is another Volvo 16 valve dragracing engine: http://forum.savarturbo.se/viewtopic...it=16V#p447194

Erland
I'm wondering if he isn't playing a shorter duration exhaust cam (playing with L/D). I'm also keeping in mind that they are using methanol as well, which changes some aspects of engine breathing and exhaust density. I'm really curious what they are seeing for manifold pressure ratios with their 50psi+ meth setups.


Seeing that F1 video and watching them make the mold from wood was really cool. Just thinking of how things use to have to be done...blue-prints by the bajillion.

Last edited by homemade wrx; Jan 9, 2012 at 10:35 AM.
homemade wrx is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2012, 01:45 PM
  #1099  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beetspeed
Maybe the difference with the ET's 4g63 engine is it runs less boost, has a little better VE and runs higher rpm, which alltogether yields less stress on crank bearings/block, so the block holds without using concrete fillings?

+ how good is your knock sensing/control?
How do you have less stress on the bearings if you rev higher? Am I missing something?
kouzman is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2012, 03:18 PM
  #1100  
Newbie
 
gasolinebaptism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kennewick WA
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Higher RPM usually nets lower torque. You can almost think of torque as a bearing load and duration formula.
Less duration (higher rpm) of high bearing load provides better being wear.
Less Overall bearing load due to less power per RPM (torque), thus providing better bearing wear.
these things coupled with a near perfectly balanced rotating assembly allows for exceptional bearing life at these power levels.
gasolinebaptism is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2012, 05:47 PM
  #1101  
Newbie
 
Erland Cox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tim radley
Its because he makes 1500bhp not 1300bhp. Do you rev to peak torque or peak power?

I have to ask David about that.
The Volvo runs on methanol.

Erland
Erland Cox is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 12:39 AM
  #1102  
Evolving Member
 
tim radley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gasolinebaptism
Higher RPM usually nets lower torque. You can almost think of torque as a bearing load and duration formula.
Less duration (higher rpm) of high bearing load provides better being wear.
Less Overall bearing load due to less power per RPM (torque), thus providing better bearing wear.
these things coupled with a near perfectly balanced rotating assembly allows for exceptional bearing life at these power levels.
That's not true though. Torque reading off a dyno is moment of torque, it is not a work rate figure. 1hp = 550ft/sec, so you have more torque work being done at peak power rpm than you do at peak torque rpm.


Originally Posted by Erland ***
I have to ask David about that.
The Volvo runs on methanol.

Erland
Haha i can't wait to hear back.

Your max power rpm is around 8000. Spyros is around 12000 i'm guessing. So he will be making a lot less torque. But still i would be surprised if he has the stock block stay in one piece anywhere near that power without a much stronger cradle or some kind of extra block support.

How's my sister?
tim radley is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 02:45 AM
  #1103  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Extreme Tuners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Happy new year

Sorry that i haven’t see and response to any pm or email yet.
Please send me again email to spyros@extreme-tuners.com its more easy to see them.

Back in action.

Here is the evo ix that we will try to brake the 60-130 (100-200kmh).
We did a quick test last week just to setup the traction control and boost was at 27-30psi.
We did the test for a Greek tuning magazine with vbox 3 100hz speed and video also that we will publish. As the magazine is not yet published and its not fair for them to tell the times sooner I just inform u that we had between 3sec - 3.5sec. But I can after 5days with more details and the vbox file.
Its full street car as u might know with full stock interior with driver and co driver and slight uphill road. The total weight on the test was 3580lbs.
We did the test close to 1400hp. We have extra one bar for the next tests and close to 350hp more, we tried to boost more than 30psi but the road but we had not traction. At the next test we will use dragtires to rise the boost.

But I am sure we can break the record with not more than 1550hp.

We will upload also pics this week of the Joes setup as we are about to finish it.
Our new billet intake manifold and some new T4 and T3 turbos. The 3000hp fuel kit and our new cast cylinder head that are about to publish soon.

















Spyros
Extreme Tuners is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 03:59 AM
  #1104  
Evolving Member
 
tim radley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Extreme Tuners
Here is the evo ix that we will try to brake the 60-130 (100-200kmh).
Why not also test it from 30-130mph? That is a big competition over here in England. Then you can compare to the fast cars here. If you are testing 60-130 you might as well do 30-130.
tim radley is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 06:36 AM
  #1105  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GraphiteEvo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Unknown
Posts: 166
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Awesome, can't wait!
GraphiteEvo9 is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 08:04 AM
  #1106  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Extreme Tuners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tim radley
Why not also test it from 30-130mph? That is a big competition over here in England. Then you can compare to the fast cars here. If you are testing 60-130 you might as well do 30-130.

They inform me from the magazine that we didnt start from 1rst gear to measure it correct. They found a measurement with 2nd gear full throttle that was too slowresponse as the lag was big and had 30-130mph +~5sec.
Extreme Tuners is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 09:39 AM
  #1107  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
juanmedina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: greenville, sc
Posts: 426
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6speed member's other cars:
3.04 - Underground Racing TT Gallardo E-Gear (Bob Helms' car) / 1-shift
3.31 - AMS Alpha 12 GT-R
3.33 - Divexxtreme / Switzer R1KX GT-R
3.53 - Underground Racing TT Gallardo Nera 6-MT / 2-shifts
3.61 - HoustonT / Underground Racing TT Gallardo 6-MT / 1-shift
3.85 - Switzer / R1K GT-R / 2-shifts
3.95 - 1swtride / C6 Z06 / built 427, YSI blower, 1080rwhp, auto
4.09 - Acicchelli / TT Gallardo / 1-shift
4.21 - DJborya / BMW 325i / S52 with 80mm turbo / 1-shift
4.23 - TwinTurboM3 / TT E46 M3 with nitrous / 0-shifts (4th gear only)
4.49 - TwinTurboM3 / TT E36 M3/ 0-shifts
4.52 - jbsteven / SC&TT Ford GT 994 rwhp / 1-shift
4.53 - HoustonT / 880 rwhp Supra / 1-shift
4.55 - Greg-TT / 770awhp GT-R
I can't wait to see the vid
juanmedina is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 09:50 AM
  #1108  
Evolving Member
 
tim radley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Extreme Tuners
They inform me from the magazine that we didnt start from 1rst gear to measure it correct. They found a measurement with 2nd gear full throttle that was too slowresponse as the lag was big and had 30-130mph +~5sec.
That makes sense.
What ecu are you running?
tim radley is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 09:58 AM
  #1109  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Extreme Tuners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
6speed member's other cars:
3.04 - Underground Racing TT Gallardo E-Gear (Bob Helms' car) / 1-shift
3.31 - AMS Alpha 12 GT-R
3.33 - Divexxtreme / Switzer R1KX GT-R
3.53 - Underground Racing TT Gallardo Nera 6-MT / 2-shifts
3.61 - HoustonT / Underground Racing TT Gallardo 6-MT / 1-shift
3.85 - Switzer / R1K GT-R / 2-shifts
3.95 - 1swtride / C6 Z06 / built 427, YSI blower, 1080rwhp, auto
4.09 - Acicchelli / TT Gallardo / 1-shift
4.21 - DJborya / BMW 325i / S52 with 80mm turbo / 1-shift
4.23 - TwinTurboM3 / TT E46 M3 with nitrous / 0-shifts (4th gear only)
4.49 - TwinTurboM3 / TT E36 M3/ 0-shifts
4.52 - jbsteven / SC&TT Ford GT 994 rwhp / 1-shift
4.53 - HoustonT / 880 rwhp Supra / 1-shift
4.55 - Greg-TT / 770awhp GT-R

I can't wait to see the vid
From standing pass and with dragtires in the dragstrip the time is always lower as the car coming to 60mph faster.
We realy want to see something from 30-40-50 full throtle pass, from the cars on the list. And ofcourse on a regular road. From the list above i see that some starting from standing.

Last edited by Extreme Tuners; Jan 10, 2012 at 10:21 AM.
Extreme Tuners is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2012, 11:46 AM
  #1110  
Newbie
 
Erland Cox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spyros, how can you have grip on a ordinary road with 1400 hp even if you have 4 wheel drive? What kind of tires are you using?


Erland
Erland Cox is offline  


Quick Reply: Highest HP 4g63 engine (from 2007)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 AM.