Spec Ops + Tab-Fab HTA3586 on 93 octane!
#17
Account Disabled
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to say this I have too no way this a 86 turbo the spool is virtually impossible. This looks like a graph,power level,spool up,and tq looks like a 30r..Can you prove it's a 3586 cause on 28 psi this thing should make 500 whp with out breaking a sweat.
#22
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I built the entire turbo kit
I spooled a regular 35r with the kit 26psi by 4,500 rpms with a AMS intake manifold and Kelford 272 cams. Also made 452/346 on 93 octane with AEM on a dynomite dyno.
I spooled a regular 35r with the kit 26psi by 4,500 rpms with a AMS intake manifold and Kelford 272 cams. Also made 452/346 on 93 octane with AEM on a dynomite dyno.
#24
Account Disabled
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice one columbo!!!!!!
http://store.forcedperformance.net/m..._Code=Turbo-FP Proof!!
Last edited by EVO IXMR; Nov 22, 2010 at 04:18 PM.
#25
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The turbo that went with the kit was a regular 35r. He sent the turbo in to FP for an 86 upgrade. They could have easily made the .63 housing fit. I'll let Detroit comment, but he did send it in for an upgrade did not buy an hta86 new from FP
#28
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 35r should have spooled faster, if I had a stock intake manifold and more spool friends cams (like gsc's).
My fp-red wouldn't hit 26psi untill around 4,400-4,500rpms. Most are hitting that around 4k. My car just didn't spool quick.
Detroit has a stock intake manifold, gsc cams plus MIVEC tuning, and you have to remember there probably isn't anyone out there with a .63 hta86.
My fp-red wouldn't hit 26psi untill around 4,400-4,500rpms. Most are hitting that around 4k. My car just didn't spool quick.
Detroit has a stock intake manifold, gsc cams plus MIVEC tuning, and you have to remember there probably isn't anyone out there with a .63 hta86.
#29
Account Disabled
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 35r should have spooled faster, if I had a stock intake manifold and more spool friends cams (like gsc's).
My fp-red wouldn't hit 26psi untill around 4,400-4,500rpms. Most are hitting that around 4k. My car just didn't spool quick.
Detroit has a stock intake manifold, gsc cams plus MIVEC tuning, and you have to remember there probably isn't anyone out there with a .63 hta86.
My fp-red wouldn't hit 26psi untill around 4,400-4,500rpms. Most are hitting that around 4k. My car just didn't spool quick.
Detroit has a stock intake manifold, gsc cams plus MIVEC tuning, and you have to remember there probably isn't anyone out there with a .63 hta86.
Even my car didn't even spool that fast and I have the same cams and mivec in it and I'M on a 63.ar with lean afrs to spool it fast..I think someone else would have done this cause if this was the case it would have be mentioned...This car spools like a red..On 28 psi this car would have made a ton more power.
#30
Account Disabled
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if you made this manifold with the smaller runners it would not spool a 86 that quick.
This mean this car spools faster then a 2.4 stroker .https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-25-5psi.html
This mean this car spools faster then a 2.4 stroker .https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-25-5psi.html
Last edited by EVO IXMR; Nov 22, 2010 at 04:46 PM.