Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAP EF-series Turbochargers results thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 08:32 PM
  #1231  
evotuner04's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
And you even have Mivec power lol. What were the numbers you put down? Did you like turbo??
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 10:06 AM
  #1232  
90zcrex's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 2
From: Columbia, SC
Yea, well my injectors are maxed out right now but I'm at around 460 ish on VD at 27psi with alot more tuning to go. I absolutely love it on the highway, it pulls like crazy, but riding around town I kinda miss the spoolup of the stock turbo as I DD the car.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 12:01 PM
  #1233  
DisgustipatedM3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by j255c
I'm not trying to bash the EF2 and EF2.5, because when some money frees up i was planning on getting one. But..

An EVO 9 with a nice set of cams and decent intercooler on a stock IX turbo can put out 420whp on e85 @ 30psi.

Why even bother?
I feel like a lot of people really don't understand dynographs. All you're saying when you say "420 whp" on a stock 9 turbo is that it makes 420 whp at PEAK.

Again, PEAK. Peak means AT HIGHEST. There is a thing called a powerband. Let me show you the difference between a stock turbo and an EF2 (note: this is on an Evo X, but it's still a valid demonstration)



And not to be rhetorical, but let's say you have a stock turbo @ 420 whp PEAK vs an upgraded turbo like an HTA Green or EF2 etc @ 420 whp PEAK... based on the powerband differences I've shown you, which do you think is faster?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 01:06 PM
  #1234  
evotuner04's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
damn those mivec cars spool fast, so damn unfair
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 09:26 PM
  #1235  
DisgustipatedM3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by evotuner04
damn those mivec cars spool fast, so damn unfair
That's an Evo X so the spool is even better than the 9. Spools like it has more displacement, X MIVEC is awesome!!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 10:28 PM
  #1236  
evotuner04's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
but evo 9 much much much faster lol
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 10:34 PM
  #1237  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by evotuner04
but evo 9 much much much faster lol
Not if turning

Also, its easier to make faster but the X with weight reduction and getting close to the 9 in weight has the advantage.

Like I said, its just easier to be faster because of weight.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 11:19 PM
  #1238  
evotuner04's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
id be willing to bet lots of money that a 9 or even 8 would destroy a X on the road course with same power/weight

wheres all these X's with weight reduction and good power whooping up on the road coures auto x's?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 11:36 PM
  #1239  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
^You are joking right? You are drunk lol

Seriously though, if the X had the same power/weight its not a contest even on a road course. Did you not ever see the AMS time attack car or Ryan gates? They won basically every race they were in. AMS just moved on to GTR's.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 01:12 AM
  #1240  
fightex's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 223
Likes: 6
From: friendly Canadia
I absolutely hate arguing about X vs 8/9 because i genuinely like the X for what it is, but i'm sick of X guys bringing up Ryan Gates when they talk about time attack like he's the end all of racing. he is ONE example State side, and maybe the only one. CT9As mop the floor around the world where Xs aren't even competitive if you talk about all out time attack - Evo 9s and Evo 6s scored two 1-2 finish in both Pro and Open class in World Time Attack 2012 alone. and we're not even talking about Tsukuba time attacks where Evo 5-8s have held the street car record for 10+ years.

stock for stock Xs have S-AYC, which is much better than the neutered 1 way rear LSD found in USDM 8/9s, hence less understeer. if you watch JDM videos or EUDM videos, the reviewers never say anything about a huge chassis balance disparity between the 2 generations because JDM Evos have had AYC since Evo 4.

either way, most guys with high power S-AYC/AYC cars (JDM Evo 4+ to Evo X) either swap to built USDM rear diffs because they can handle more power, or they go with real aftermarket 1.5 ways (Cusco, ATS, OS Giken etc)

now lets keep this a MAP EF turbo thread
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 06:29 AM
  #1241  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by fightex
I absolutely hate arguing about X vs 8/9 because i genuinely like the X for what it is, but i'm sick of X guys bringing up Ryan Gates when they talk about time attack like he's the end all of racing. he is ONE example State side, and maybe the only one. CT9As mop the floor around the world where Xs aren't even competitive if you talk about all out time attack - Evo 9s and Evo 6s scored two 1-2 finish in both Pro and Open class in World Time Attack 2012 alone. and we're not even talking about Tsukuba time attacks where Evo 5-8s have held the street car record for 10+ years.

stock for stock Xs have S-AYC, which is much better than the neutered 1 way rear LSD found in USDM 8/9s, hence less understeer. if you watch JDM videos or EUDM videos, the reviewers never say anything about a huge chassis balance disparity between the 2 generations because JDM Evos have had AYC since Evo 4.

either way, most guys with high power S-AYC/AYC cars (JDM Evo 4+ to Evo X) either swap to built USDM rear diffs because they can handle more power, or they go with real aftermarket 1.5 ways (Cusco, ATS, OS Giken etc)

now lets keep this a MAP EF turbo thread
Well I debated typing up a really big response here but I will simply say this...do you really think Mitsu would release something that pales in comparison to its previous generation in every way possible? I have owned both an 8 an the X now and love both. I would ideally own both, and plan to some day. But realistically, the X has only been out 4 year compared to the 20+ years of 4g63 cars...people are just more comfortable with the 4g63 and have experience and haven't bothered to upgrade yet as aftermarket is still developing for the 4b11.

The motor is more efficient and the frame is stronger/more rigid...safety weighs it down. The AMS time attack evo took down the sierra sierra evo if I recall and basically took first place every race it went to. That is almost full race car style and it could hang with pretty much anything.

I am not taking anything away from the 8/9 its an awesome platform and I love it and respect it.

Sorry, my "short response" was longer than I thought, I still held back haha.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 07:23 AM
  #1242  
RussellDaniel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: hinesville
will the ef4 hold 38-39 psi to redline. Right now im on the internal wastegate and it spikes 38 but begins to taper down to 33. Im thinking about running map external wastegate and dump 02. Hope it will hold more boost up top. Have searched everywhere but can't find anything on how much boost this turbo can hold out.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 07:30 AM
  #1243  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,591
Likes: 303
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by RussellDaniel
will the ef4 hold 38-39 psi to redline. Right now im on the internal wastegate and it spikes 38 but begins to taper down to 33. Im thinking about running map external wastegate and dump 02. Hope it will hold more boost up top. Have searched everywhere but can't find anything on how much boost this turbo can hold out.
It should mine will hold 36 lbs to redline with a 3 port.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 07:35 AM
  #1244  
RussellDaniel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: hinesville
Originally Posted by cursedsm
It should mine will hold 36 lbs to redline with a 3 port.
see this is what I've been trying to find out. I have the 18 psi internal wastegate actuator now making right around 600. If I can get it to hold boost from 6500-8500 that's roughly gonna be another 30-40 whp. I just haven't been a dyno graph of anyone running more than 35 on this turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 07:37 AM
  #1245  
RussellDaniel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: hinesville
Originally Posted by cursedsm
It should mine will hold 36 lbs to redline with a 3 port.
are you running external wastegate?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 PM.