Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAP EF4 e85 built 2L tuned by tscompusa/vr-speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #196  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
so when someone is very happy with the car that makes the turbo a good choice?
Yes.

Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
when I do a build I set a HP goal. nothing more nothing less is really needed. then I choose the best turbo for the job. because I want the broadest power band possible for the setup. this will give you the fastest drag car. the fastest street car. the fastest autocross car. the most fun for your money. why would you want to settle for anything less? I know I dont.
Budget constraints, ease of installation. There are several EF4 customers in this thread, why don't we ask them? Why did you guys choose to go stock frame over T3?

Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
Chris your comparison graph of black verses EF4 is down right stupid...they are different cars on different days and a whole host of different variables.
So it's acceptable for you to compare different cars, on different days, with different measuring devices, on a different frame but I can't compare similar cars on my dyno?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 08:10 PM
  #197  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by batty200
Jerry makes some very valid points. For the cost of these stock replacement turbos there isnt a big price cut on high horsepower setups. At that point you just need to look at what setup has the best powerband for the power goal. If the turbine housing is such a huge problem why use it? Then adding tubular manifolds and FF mani's for stock replacement turbos kills the whole draw. Now if it is a budget thing than I understand because I am on a tight budget so whatever is affordable is what I am doing. I may not have an optimal setup but it is what I can afford. So I may want something better but cant have it I will admit it isnt optimal and not act like it is perfect.
I completely agree with you sir. We never claimed this was the best all around turbo on the market for 550-650whp, but as far as I know it is the most cost effective route to get there. I've seen at least one EFR graph that looked amazing, but what did that customer pay to achieve that performance? And how long did he have to wait to get that turbocharger?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 08:14 PM
  #198  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by batty200
Jerry makes some very valid points. For the cost of these stock replacement turbos there isnt a big price cut on high horsepower setups. At that point you just need to look at what setup has the best powerband for the power goal. If the turbine housing is such a huge problem why use it? Then adding tubular manifolds and FF mani's for stock replacement turbos kills the whole draw. Now if it is a budget thing than I understand because I am on a tight budget so whatever is affordable is what I am doing. I may not have an optimal setup but it is what I can afford. So I may want something better but cant have it I will admit it isnt optimal and not act like it is perfect.
And I agree with what you said, and some of the things Jerry is saying. Thing is you can't call a turbo a turd just cause it uses different components and being the wheels are larger then some of the other stock frame turbos. Sure the ef series will not spool like stock or other stock frame turbos being they use totally different chra. I am sure when Chris gets back he can confirm this. In my case I am useing the old sst turbo frame.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 08:46 PM
  #199  
Revobasher's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MN
Good debate. For the most part. Lol. I am going from stock block and ported BBK full to MAP 2.3\EF4 next week. Do I expect the same low end torque and spool as my BBK? Of course not. But over 500 HP as the car sits today I have reached max potential and am upgrading. IMO, for the money there is no better stock frame turbo for a DD\weekend trips to the strip. To call this turbo a "turd" is ignorant and I commend MAP for defending its product and sharing actual customer feedback. Look for my official dynosheet\review in the coming weeks.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 09:02 PM
  #200  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by Revobasher
Good debate. For the most part. Lol. I am going from stock block and ported BBK full to MAP 2.3\EF4 next week. Do I expect the same low end torque and spool as my BBK? Of course not. But over 500 HP as the car sits today I have reached max potential and am upgrading. IMO, for the money there is no better stock frame turbo for a DD\weekend trips to the strip. To call this turbo a "turd" is ignorant and I commend MAP for defending its product and sharing actual customer feedback. Look for my official dynosheet\review in the coming weeks.
Should be a blast I can't wait to see the results.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 09:09 PM
  #201  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by cursedsm
Why we all know what he would say there garbage because there not his products. Why don't we get other tuners, shops, and anyone else who has used them to give feedback on what they think of the turbos instead.
Daves comments would be much like mine. For no other reason than he knows how to read a dyno graph. He has done more testing than all shops and stores on these forums. He only sells products that work . His opinion should be respected as the most important since he likely has added more to this hobby than anyone else hands down. He most certainly has acquired more knowledge than anyone else. fact is he wont come in here because he and map dont get along. There is no way to sugar coat the truth. So anything he says on the turbo would be considered vender bashing.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 10:26 PM
  #202  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
Lets not bring Dave's comments into this thread as I feel it would seriously derail it more (nothing against him or anyone else in here). This thread needs to get back on topic. No more bickering.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2012 | 11:03 PM
  #203  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Chris was saying OP's car on pg 12, you werent talking about OP tho you were talking about my cars data

And alright how bout this, Ill get S1's, a stock ported intake manifold, and a stock ported exhaust manifold on my car with a 2.5" exhaust so we can see 500wtq off idle

BTW the knock was likely a fluke, Ive done several pulls logging since that log and I have 0 knock across the board and the tune hasnt changed.

Last edited by Svendiesel; Jan 31, 2012 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 07:16 AM
  #204  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
Sven, just curious but why did you go with a stock replacement turbo then buy a manifold for it? Was it a piece by piece assembly or did you buy it all at the same time? Why did you choose that over a t3? These answers from an actual EF4 user would be nice insight.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 09:25 AM
  #205  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
It was sort of piece by piece. My stock motor blew in like early April of 2010, unexpectedly too...if thats possible for an evo lol. So I wasnt really financially ready to go ***** out since I was 20 and only working part time plus going to school full time. I wasnt really pushing the blocks' power limits either, car was making like 390/390. When the motor blew, I called Buschur for a motor and a build and I went with an FP Black since it was a much cheaper route at the time to just do a stock ported manifold with it, rather than spend $4500ish on a T3 kit.

I got the car back from Buschur a few months later in August and then my head blew 3 weeks after getting it home from some wicked detonation. At that point, I had the money to go a little further with everything so I decided I wanted to push a stock appearing setup, so I bought the ToxicFab manifold, had a fresh turbo from FP, decided to sell it, then got the EF4.

At this point, once I reach my goal with the car how it is now, I will be going with a 3794 or 6766. Not looking to break any records or anything, just want to have some fun.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #206  
maperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 20
From: Cottage Grove, MN
Originally Posted by Svendiesel
It was sort of piece by piece. My stock motor blew in like early April of 2010, unexpectedly too...if thats possible for an evo lol. So I wasnt really financially ready to go ***** out since I was 20 and only working part time plus going to school full time. I wasnt really pushing the blocks' power limits either, car was making like 390/390. When the motor blew, I called Buschur for a motor and a build and I went with an FP Black since it was a much cheaper route at the time to just do a stock ported manifold with it, rather than spend $4500ish on a T3 kit.

I got the car back from Buschur a few months later in August and then my head blew 3 weeks after getting it home from some wicked detonation. At that point, I had the money to go a little further with everything so I decided I wanted to push a stock appearing setup, so I bought the ToxicFab manifold, had a fresh turbo from FP, decided to sell it, then got the EF4.

At this point, once I reach my goal with the car how it is now, I will be going with a 3794 or 6766. Not looking to break any records or anything, just want to have some fun.

You forgot to mention you ran the FP black and it didn't meet your goals, if I'm not mistaken?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 12:30 PM
  #207  
getsideways's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 924
Likes: 2
From: WI
Originally Posted by Svendiesel

At this point, once I reach my goal with the car how it is now, I will be going with a 3794 or 6766. Not looking to break any records or anything, just want to have some fun.
But those will be laggy piles of poo too
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 07:27 PM
  #208  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by getsideways
But those will be laggy piles of poo too
But they will make 200 more whp. If they didnt lag more there would be no reason not to run those huge boys.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 07:39 PM
  #209  
getsideways's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 924
Likes: 2
From: WI
Sarcasim is at times.... hard to detect on the good ole www


And yes you hit the nail right on the head!
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 10:08 PM
  #210  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Originally Posted by getsideways
But those will be laggy piles of poo too

LOL yes. The fact that the gearing in the evos is so short really numbs the feeling of lag, its there for a second and then the whole gear passes by in the blink of an eye. Ill be ok with making 800-900whp, even if it means not seeing 300wtq till 4300rpms lol.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:40 PM.