map ef4 stock block and e85 tscompusa tuned
Nov 24, 2011, 06:45 PM
#31
So that will eliminate the spot where you can really feel it kick ya in the *** when not wot? I mean if i am just tooling around and I rev high in the rpm range with minimal throttle you can feel where it really starts to pick up. Is that what your talking about being able to control where that actually kicks in?
Nov 24, 2011, 09:03 PM
#35
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: sacramento
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what's a map ef4 turbo compared to an FP? Like an FP red?Also, I know this has been discussed before, but is it completely possible to use like a grimmspeed 3 port to control the boost curve, then use like a hallman in cabin to control PEAK boost... that way you still have the ability to turn up the boost but still have the convenience of having the hallman at your fingertips
Nov 24, 2011, 10:12 PM
#37
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: sacramento
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So it would be safer to use a bigger turbo because youd have a higher powerband... than to use like an fp green which would produce more low range torque. That way you can take advantage of the higher powerband (5-8K right?) just wondering if its okay to rev to 8K with the stock bottom end. Even if you have cams+valve springs
I ask this because I see your graph only goes to around 7K. With that large of a turbo you'd want to be using the higher RPM range right?
Just being curious... I like to learn and be knowledgeable rather than to just guess and spread incorrect information.
I ask this because I see your graph only goes to around 7K. With that large of a turbo you'd want to be using the higher RPM range right?
Just being curious... I like to learn and be knowledgeable rather than to just guess and spread incorrect information.
Nov 25, 2011, 06:52 AM
#40
So it would be safer to use a bigger turbo because youd have a higher powerband... than to use like an fp green which would produce more low range torque. That way you can take advantage of the higher powerband (5-8K right?) just wondering if its okay to rev to 8K with the stock bottom end. Even if you have cams+valve springs
I ask this because I see your graph only goes to around 7K. With that large of a turbo you'd want to be using the higher RPM range right?
Just being curious... I like to learn and be knowledgeable rather than to just guess and spread incorrect information.
I ask this because I see your graph only goes to around 7K. With that large of a turbo you'd want to be using the higher RPM range right?
Just being curious... I like to learn and be knowledgeable rather than to just guess and spread incorrect information.
Nov 25, 2011, 06:54 AM
#41
Positive this car had the fuel pump in it way before they came out witht he double pumper for the evo. They had them for the dsm, but not at the point for the evo. Guy I got the car off of had it modded with only 3k miles on it and he auto x and road raced it. That and I have recepts for everything on the car.
Nov 25, 2011, 05:42 PM
#43
530-540 is where its normally out of fuel on e85 with a single walbro + enough injector to compensate.. Brians car is running near 13 AFR's though, so the IDC is not entirely maxed out. we definitely need to get a double pumper in it though .. im pretty sure the pumps punched.
next mod = br double pumper or walbro 400.. personally id take the br double pumper anyday over any other fuel pump. been working like a clock on my car ever since i installed it.
next mod = br double pumper or walbro 400.. personally id take the br double pumper anyday over any other fuel pump. been working like a clock on my car ever since i installed it.
