mrfred's testing is very accurate..

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ve...mp-wiring.html

real world experience says his testing is 100% accurate and should not be questioned. questioning that kind of solid data is rude.

 

Not only that but he gave all the info and data needed. Stock wireing, rewired, what boost level etc. All the stuff you need to know not some bull**** #'s from whatever and however they tested.

 

exactly.. hes the last person you want to question when it comes to testing.. his tests are all 100% genuine and accurate.

 

There are also a lot of tests to the opposite of your conclusions based on mrfreds test. Its not ever rude to analyze data. I think you feel upset because hoards of data would suggest the power you consistently post on a single wally on E85 from vdr rarely jives with other very reputable tuner numbers and the only trap speed you have to back up your dyno numbers to date is the stock block holset car.

Dont get so defensive over questioning and analytics just because it could potentially cast you in what you perceive to be a negative light.

MAP AMS STM etc.... have all pushes the DW pump well beyond a wally 255 in HP with E85. How is that possible if it flows less?

 

blah blah blah quit *****ing in my build thread about what is good data what is not do it somewhere else. If you dont have anything to say about my car and the tune dont post here. Mr Freds data is accurate get over it.

 

Can't wait to see how this car performs in spring! Us stock block guys are going to dump the laundry this year.

 

If your car traps 135+ then congratulations on the most freakish single wally in history. I wish you well.

 

The DW pump flows less based on around 6 cars ive tuned.. we swapped a dw pump in place of a walbro and the car leaned out.. and no matter what was done it would not go richer.

the walbro 255 also supports in the range of 480-520hp dynojet all day long on e85.

the above has been proven time and time again. if you want to argue with facts and think you're mr know it all be my guest.

if you maxed out your walbro with 450hp then i wish you luck, because your car has serious fuel bottleneck issues somewhere. i gotta laugh at you.. we try to help you, and you don't listen.. you'll learn.

also instead of being ignorant, why don't you read the fact his afr were almost 13's when he made that mid 500hp number.

you have no clue of the cars i have on the street / strip.. only what im allowed to share.. there are customers who do not want their stuff shared and run a hell of a lot faster then 140mph.

and evos are not the only cars i tune either. you have no idea what i do, so lets not assume anymore.

 

show me???????? show me proof that a DW outflows a walbro untouched.. if you do it will be a lie.. we have already done the testing..

If you want to deny the truth then that is your decision.. I have NOTHING to gain and NOTHING to lose by telling the truth on this forum regarding these products..

I do hate when false information gets thrown around though, and i have tons of proof that DW pump gets its *** kicked by a little old walbro 255 out of the box.

Do you seriously think id be wasting my time trying to tell you if it wasnt true?

not rewired, not modified, straight out of the box.. the dw300 gets its **** kicked in by a walbro 255.. i dont know how else to put it to you.. then when you punch the relief in the walbro its not even worth comparing.

 

wait a second.. do you think 540whp in a full weight evo on a dynojet can go 135mph? did i read that right?

 

Theoretically mine should being if I could get a decent launch, not misshift, and having an RS.

 

Maybe you should keep him away from the 1 800 #'s hes gets in back of those playboys he keeps under his desk

 

I have Wally 255 and BAP. Chris and I talked about DW300 with my BAP instead of Wally 400 on my new setup given the failures MAP has seen with them. But this thread has me reconsidering.

 

I myself was looking into the wally 400 being well it would be cheaper for me to put in the car with very little money comming in, but on the other side of it with e85 I will run out 650ish. Now for what I have that would be fine, but what happens when I go your route Revobasher or even Svendeisels route with the 2.4 and I run out of pump again. The double pumper would eliminate that problem. I know I have been driving Tom crazy with what to do what to do. But in the end I will keep the double pumper my next upgrade.

 

I hope not Scott. I want to have at least one more summer on stock block before I have to rebuild. I would like to make a pass or two this year as well but I have no trailor for the car so I would have to drive it. I know what happens when I don't take extra percautions hahaha it will go boom. This is why I didn't want to run test and tune at the shootout last year. It would have been a long walk home for sure.