Where do you think timing is at?

You can't really compare your numbers to his, you're across the US, completely different setup, on another dyno, with completely different weather. It was about 100 degrees and humid here in the middle of July when I did his.

Everything has to work and flow together to make good power. If you have one bottleneck in the system everything else has to work harder to overcome it. Therefore, telling him to get better flowing parts to replace his restrictive ones is not misleading at all. It's giving helpful advise for getting the most out of his setup. Would you put the equivalent of a 2" downpipe on a GT30R and expect any good to come of it? Doubt it.

I'm not trying to be a dick, but when people are basically saying my tuning is sub-par it gets to me, and it affects business. No one else on this site was there when I was tuning it, so acting like you know what's going on with the car is asinine. If you want to add 4 degrees to the top of his timing map, go ahead and crack a piston. It won't be my fault. It wasn't making any more power with an additional 2 degrees, so I dialed it back and called it good. That right there tells me there's something else going on. If Aaron from English tuned it and made this power, everyone would be swinging from his nuts saying it's perfect

And just to be clear, I haven't had a car on my dyno that read lower on any other dyno in the area (including Mustang and Dyno Dynamics). The OP can attest to this as his friend got his heart broken when he put his car on there for some runs (Evo9 2.3L, FPBlack, built and tuned at another well known shop and only put down 420whp). So this statement has no bearing.

/rant

~Chris@MooreAutomotive