Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo IX RS - Stock block / Stock cams / 6266 / E85 @ 32.7psi | 10.76 @ 136.17

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2016, 11:36 PM
  #31  
Newbie
 
nickelndime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 90
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Nice runs! Seems your mph is supporting your #s on virtual dyno too. Cool to see the motor is holding up for you.
Old Feb 21, 2016, 06:00 AM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: connecticut
Posts: 1,006
Received 66 Likes on 58 Posts
very nice times at your power level !!
Old Feb 21, 2016, 07:36 AM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (36)
 
e_kobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 2,960
Received 99 Likes on 94 Posts
Awesome job Morgan! Killer times for a stock block with that many miles
Old Feb 22, 2016, 05:19 PM
  #34  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by mrm95
Well i finally got to take the car to the track! The Street Car Takeover was in town and i figure why not a better time to make some passes. It was down for 2 months from Nov-Jan getting a rebuilt trans with an evo 8 4th and 5th gear along with an exedy twin HD. Other than that, nothing power wise on the car has changed. It did do way better at the track then i expected it to do. Started off with some mediocre passes trying to get the new clutch figured out but ended up with many 10 second passes then ended up doing a 10.7@136 after i dropped the tire pressure down to 25 psi. This was done on Bridgestone Potenza RE760 245/45/17 street tires. Not bad for a stock longblock just shy of 103,000 miles.

Ive been waiting a long time to get back to the track. And im sure this is the last pass the stock motor will see being that me and Tom have been discussing a 2.0l LR build which should happen this summer hopefully.

Pics attached below

TSCOMPTUNED FTW!




Good job Morgan! 136 trap speed in a full weight RS is about a 650whp car. You didn't remove any interior or pieces of the car right?

Also 87F or whatever it was, doesn't help either. You should be very happy with your times. and ET. You improved just about every pass.
Old Feb 22, 2016, 07:50 PM
  #35  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ZanarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
that mph though, god damn
Old Feb 22, 2016, 09:05 PM
  #36  
Evolving Member
 
SiriusEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: D
Posts: 195
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Very well done Tom
Old Feb 23, 2016, 07:53 AM
  #37  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mrm95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tscompusa
Good job Morgan! 136 trap speed in a full weight RS is about a 650whp car. You didn't remove any interior or pieces of the car right?

Also 87F or whatever it was, doesn't help either. You should be very happy with your times. and ET. You improved just about every pass.
Yeah the car is roughly 3200 with me in it. But yes full interior, only the spare tire, washer fluid reservior, etc in the trunk has been removed
Old Feb 25, 2016, 02:56 PM
  #38  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ZanarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I think that car could do alot better then a 10.9 with that trap speed. are you on a stock evo ix transmission? If so I would look at getting a longer final drive or switching to an evo 8 4th gear on the cheap. I assume your going into 5th
Old Feb 25, 2016, 07:28 PM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
caLi4G63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: so. caLi
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
By simply lowering his 60ft time he would see a better ET. If he can get into the 1.4/1.5 60ft range he would be in the mid to low 10s.
Old Feb 26, 2016, 02:54 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: connecticut
Posts: 1,006
Received 66 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by caLi4G63
By simply lowering his 60ft time he would see a better ET. If he can get into the 1.4/1.5 60ft range he would be in the mid to low 10s.
Thats not happening on street tires which I think the op is running, but your right about that. Maybe the op can comment on this.
Old Feb 26, 2016, 05:14 AM
  #41  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by SiriusEvo
Very well done Tom
Thank you.

Originally Posted by mrm95
Yeah the car is roughly 3200 with me in it. But yes full interior, only the spare tire, washer fluid reservior, etc in the trunk has been removed
Good stuff.

Originally Posted by ZanarkO
I think that car could do alot better then a 10.9 with that trap speed. are you on a stock evo ix transmission? If so I would look at getting a longer final drive or switching to an evo 8 4th gear on the cheap. I assume your going into 5th
It went 10.76 at 136.17 thats pretty good for street tires and his 60ft.

That mph can go 10.3-10.4 with a perfect pass and slicks though (for this vehicle) (or quicker).

Look at my car. I went 148.14 and only 10.26. (pathetic) Its a lot different once you are actually there. It is hard to ET a car. The mph for the most part comes naturally with the power, but even that is skewed a little based on driving & track conditions.


Originally Posted by ctfpevoVIII
Thats not happening on street tires which I think the op is running, but your right about that. Maybe the op can comment on this.
Definitely had street tires. I'll let Morgan confirm.

Last edited by tscompusa; Feb 26, 2016 at 05:57 AM.
Old Feb 26, 2016, 08:03 AM
  #42  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mrm95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yes the car was on street tires. And I got the 10.7 after I let some air out
Old Feb 26, 2016, 10:16 AM
  #43  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mrm95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ZanarkO
I think that car could do alot better then a 10.9 with that trap speed. are you on a stock evo ix transmission? If so I would look at getting a longer final drive or switching to an evo 8 4th gear on the cheap. I assume your going into 5th
The car has an evo 8 4th and 5th. I am finishing in 4th. And the car ran a 10.76...

Keep in mind this was on street tires.
Old Feb 26, 2016, 02:04 PM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: connecticut
Posts: 1,006
Received 66 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by mrm95
The car has an evo 8 4th and 5th. I am finishing in 4th. And the car ran a 10.76...

Keep in mind this was on street tires.
I think your et and trap are great for street tires
Old Feb 26, 2016, 11:50 PM
  #45  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mrm95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ctfpevoVIII
I think your et and trap are great for street tires
Thanks!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
638
Sep 14, 2017 10:12 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
48
Jan 28, 2015 04:43 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
40
Aug 19, 2014 06:31 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
12
Nov 26, 2013 05:01 PM
evoe85
Drag Racing
18
Nov 13, 2013 07:57 AM



Quick Reply: Evo IX RS - Stock block / Stock cams / 6266 / E85 @ 32.7psi | 10.76 @ 136.17



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:53 PM.