ATP or AMS Turbo?
Originally Posted by Az3ar
I don’t want to post on this thread anymore. I have stated my opinion and the GT35R laggs no matter what they say. just for the people who are feeding BS here be aware that people spend their hard earned money for a daily driver try not screw them just because you love supporting your tuner or you want to make sales.
In the end, you can brag about your psi, but street, strip, or road course, you'd get owned real quick by the guys mentioned in this thread. Get a clue on tuning and tuners, then come back.
Gofaster's car is tuned by the best in the business (that's right, I'll bow down because the guy is that damn good). Perhaps you should PM gofaster about it. Stop talking about things you don't know about. You are like a walking cliche.
BTW, in reference to the GTI, don't bring rally and race prepped cars into this. If you think they are the same as what we get on the street, you've got another thing comming.
P.S. If you or your wallet ever want to learn things the hard and embarassing way, come to socal for a track day. That will truely be a humbling experiance.
This Thread has detoured a bit. I am going to stay out of this one for now. If Anyone has any more questions regarding our kit please post it up in the AMS Forum and I will get to it right away.
Eric
Eric
The kit rules. My car is tuned like *** and it does lag more than stock, but it still owns the stock turbo. After first gear lag isn't even an issue. Ran a stock turbo evo and it was ownage once we hit third gear
. Before that I was dead even too, so I guess that lag doesn't hurt me that much after all
It pulls like a raped ape in 1-4 ... haven't tried 5th yet because of boost cut.
. Before that I was dead even too, so I guess that lag doesn't hurt me that much after all
It pulls like a raped ape in 1-4 ... haven't tried 5th yet because of boost cut.
Originally Posted by fre
The kit rules. My car is tuned like *** and it does lag more than stock, but it still owns the stock turbo. After first gear lag isn't even an issue. Ran a stock turbo evo and it was ownage once we hit third gear
. Before that I was dead even too, so I guess that lag doesn't hurt me that much after all
It pulls like a raped ape in 1-4 ... haven't tried 5th yet because of boost cut.
. Before that I was dead even too, so I guess that lag doesn't hurt me that much after all
It pulls like a raped ape in 1-4 ... haven't tried 5th yet because of boost cut.Fuel cut? You ust be on the stock ecu still. Just wait till that puppy gets tuned. What a difference it'll make. Enjoy being fast.
That graph shows the stock turbo vs BR440 RPM, torque, HP overlayed.
the BR440 at every rpm point below 3800rpm is 2 or 3psi less boost than the stock turbo (ie the stock turbo spools a little faster). But the catch here is at any given rpm that the 440 is making 2-3psi less boost, it's STILL MAKING MORE TQ AND HP. It doesn't matter if the larger turbo is making less boost at a certain rpm.
#1 would you rather have 20psi at 3300rpm and 275ft-lb
#2 or rather have 15psi at 3300rpm and 320ft-lb
simple choice
Originally Posted by DSMotorsport
That graph shows the stock turbo vs BR440 RPM, torque, HP overlayed.
the BR440 at every rpm point below 3800rpm is 2 or 3psi less boost than the stock turbo (ie the stock turbo spools a little faster). But the catch here is at any given rpm that the 440 is making 2-3psi less boost, it's STILL MAKING MORE TQ AND HP. It doesn't matter if the larger turbo is making less boost at a certain rpm.
#1 would you rather have 20psi at 3300rpm and 275ft-lb
#2 or rather have 15psi at 3300rpm and 320ft-lb
simple choice
Pardon, but the graph in question refers to a Buschur 440 kit, which I believe is a 3071(?) - and if so, it isn't exactly a representation of a GT35 (putting it mildly).
You've been 'explaining this' to the nth degree, but I've asked maybe two pages ago for your GT35 dyno sheet. Surely you have one(?). Even so, again, a dyno cannot measure transient response, which is my only point in this discussion-turned-sour. You insist that it is as good as the factory turbo, but I am having a difficult time believing that, and the primary reason why is as straightforward as considering a larger wheel and housing vs. fixed engine displacement.
Nevertheless, I am going to evaluate your assertion...thoroughly. How? Quite simple. I am going to purchase a GT35 kit. And I do have the supporting mods and tuning capability to use it.
Rest assured I will give a very candid, objective opinion when I do.
You've been 'explaining this' to the nth degree, but I've asked maybe two pages ago for your GT35 dyno sheet. Surely you have one(?). Even so, again, a dyno cannot measure transient response, which is my only point in this discussion-turned-sour. You insist that it is as good as the factory turbo, but I am having a difficult time believing that, and the primary reason why is as straightforward as considering a larger wheel and housing vs. fixed engine displacement.
Nevertheless, I am going to evaluate your assertion...thoroughly. How? Quite simple. I am going to purchase a GT35 kit. And I do have the supporting mods and tuning capability to use it.
Rest assured I will give a very candid, objective opinion when I do.
Originally Posted by STFU Tuning
Gofaster's car is tuned by the best in the business (that's right, I'll bow down because the guy is that damn good). Perhaps you should PM gofaster about it. Stop talking about things you don't know about. You are like a walking cliche.
BTW, in reference to the GTI, don't bring rally and race prepped cars into this. If you think they are the same as what we get on the street, you've got another thing comming.
P.S. If you or your wallet ever want to learn things the hard and embarassing way, come to socal for a track day. That will truely be a humbling experiance.
Last edited by trinydex; Dec 6, 2004 at 06:40 PM.
Originally Posted by Ted B
Pardon, but the graph in question refers to a Buschur 440 kit, which I believe is a 3071(?) - and if so, it isn't exactly a representation of a GT35 (putting it mildly).
You've been 'explaining this' to the nth degree, but I've asked maybe two pages ago for your GT35 dyno sheet. Surely you have one(?). Even so, again, a dyno cannot measure transient response, which is my only point in this discussion-turned-sour. You insist that it is as good as the factory turbo, but I am having a difficult time believing that, and the primary reason why is as straightforward as considering a larger wheel and housing vs. fixed engine displacement.
Nevertheless, I am going to evaluate your assertion...thoroughly. How? Quite simple. I am going to purchase a GT35 kit. And I do have the supporting mods and tuning capability to use it.
Rest assured I will give a very candid, objective opinion when I do.
You've been 'explaining this' to the nth degree, but I've asked maybe two pages ago for your GT35 dyno sheet. Surely you have one(?). Even so, again, a dyno cannot measure transient response, which is my only point in this discussion-turned-sour. You insist that it is as good as the factory turbo, but I am having a difficult time believing that, and the primary reason why is as straightforward as considering a larger wheel and housing vs. fixed engine displacement.
Nevertheless, I am going to evaluate your assertion...thoroughly. How? Quite simple. I am going to purchase a GT35 kit. And I do have the supporting mods and tuning capability to use it.
Rest assured I will give a very candid, objective opinion when I do.
No, I don't have a dyno plot to post. Sorry about that. Wish I did. I will see about getting you a ems log though. Have it done right and you'll be amazed.
Good luck.
Originally Posted by trinydex
DAMMIT STFU i said keep it the best kept secret in socal! :P. yeah... i was gonna say... does yer brother have a ****in' vw rally car?
Originally Posted by Ted B
Pardon, but the graph in question refers to a Buschur 440 kit, which I believe is a 3071(?) - and if so, it isn't exactly a representation of a GT35 (putting it mildly).
You've been 'explaining this' to the nth degree, but I've asked maybe two pages ago for your GT35 dyno sheet. Surely you have one(?). Even so, again, a dyno cannot measure transient response, which is my only point in this discussion-turned-sour. You insist that it is as good as the factory turbo, but I am having a difficult time believing that, and the primary reason why is as straightforward as considering a larger wheel and housing vs. fixed engine displacement.
Nevertheless, I am going to evaluate your assertion...thoroughly. How? Quite simple. I am going to purchase a GT35 kit. And I do have the supporting mods and tuning capability to use it.
Rest assured I will give a very candid, objective opinion when I do.
You've been 'explaining this' to the nth degree, but I've asked maybe two pages ago for your GT35 dyno sheet. Surely you have one(?). Even so, again, a dyno cannot measure transient response, which is my only point in this discussion-turned-sour. You insist that it is as good as the factory turbo, but I am having a difficult time believing that, and the primary reason why is as straightforward as considering a larger wheel and housing vs. fixed engine displacement.
Nevertheless, I am going to evaluate your assertion...thoroughly. How? Quite simple. I am going to purchase a GT35 kit. And I do have the supporting mods and tuning capability to use it.
Rest assured I will give a very candid, objective opinion when I do.
I simply posted to renforce the point that higher boost level at XXXrpm does not always mean more power. It's entirely possible to make more power even at "pre-spoolup" rpm with a bigger than stock turbo.
we should be concerned about when does the new turbo's torque output excede the stock turbo's torque output, not at what RPM does XYZ turbo put out XYZ psi.
Last edited by DSMotorsport; Dec 6, 2004 at 07:36 PM.






