You thought it was an important enough to point out that there was no smoking of the tires, yet you don't want to hear about the facts once again.

I have a solution. Bring your car down to Orlando and set the benchmark for the dyno. Bring your one stock dynojet dyno chart with you for comparison. While you're down here run a 109 trap in 97* heat w/ 100% humidity and let me walk you on the street. Fair enough?

 

Dude I'm not doubting your car is fast. It is very fast I personally witnessed it. But I can assure you as I have dynoed my own car at that same dyno and experienced this same jump from third to fourth and it was not even a evo. I was not there so I cannot say but from people that where there your car dynoed 58x then with no changes went up to 63x by just changing gears. Is that correct? You made 600whp at 30ps was that on fwd dynojet? Now you are in a AWD Mustang dyno calibrated to read like a AWD Dynojet so your numbers are not comparable to what you dynoed before.

Again you definately should not care about the dyno numbers as you already know the car is a beast. You don't need the dyno to tell you that.

Go to the track already

 

Amen stop arguing over ambiguous dyno numbers that dont mean **** and run your car at the track. That will give you a common reference that you can pin against all cars out there. Dyno = good for tuning not bragging. Track is where that comes into play. If somebody says my car dynos 800whp im like ok...... if they say my car runs 10.5 @ 135mph im like holy ****.

 

 

I know numbers are not everything but they are a good comparison and should not vary that much (if corrected) and if they are not a big deal why does everyone put them in there sig J/K. As far as the spinning all I know is that I saw alot of smoke come past my door (which was open) and I went through the gear real fast but who knows.

 

they took load off for that pull

 

You're retarded. No they did not... Just what evom needs, more quality info.

 

Uh, what does this have to do with anything Scott? You have way more mods than I do, so what are you trying to prove? I'm certainly not making over 320whp, but I would probably read as high as Miguel (357whp) in my 5th gear, if not higher, but we'd all know it wasn't true...

If I can run right at 111 in 80-85 degrees with 70% humidity, I can run 109 in 97 degrees with 100% humidity. Oh wait, let's see...what day is your local test'n'tune? Hmm, if it's Friday, then it will be only a HIGH of 88 with a MAX humidity of 79...wow, not that far off from when I ran my 12.22@109.19 and 12.24@110.62...

In fact, right now for comparison:

Orlando - 82 degrees, 76% humidity
Crofton, MD (Capitol Raceway) - 78 degrees, 77% humidity

Imagine that...

 

If you really want me to answer that question even though you were kidding, the answer is they are too pansey to run at the track

 

dude you seem to be a very unhappy person hellbent on argueing over this dyno. just let it be. you are not down here anyway so stop your belly aching. the reason this thread keeps draggin on is beacuse of you. and when someone responds to one of your points, you get all bent out of shape and say not that its childish to mention the points that you orignally mentioned.

bottom line, joses's car is fast and we know it, so let it go.

 

doubt it..

 

doubt it what?

 

:enters translations machine:

initializing....
.
..
...
.....
......
translating.....
.
..
...
....
.....
translation complete= Hi, my name is Eric and I am a newbie from 1300miles away who would like to build my post count with a senseless and meaningless two word post. Please don't mind me and I apologize for posting witlessly in your thread sir...

Please see my other brilliant responses such as:
"heard the 6-speed was weaker cuz the ACD..."

 

lmao

 

priceless.seriously funny shiat there man.