View Poll Results: Do You believe it?
YEs
75
26.22%
No
211
73.78%
Voters: 286. You may not vote on this poll
469AWHP on STOCK TURBO!
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,111
Likes: 1
From: Lake Mary,FL
Jesus will be posting the dyno sheet soon!! We will try to get the car on the dyno with a video so u guys can see it! This car with no doubt in my mind will be running 10's on stock turbo in no time! I hung out with the owner of the Evo last night and the car DOES have the stock turbo in it!
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Orlando,FL-OceanDr-Miami FL
Originally Posted by TURBODAWG
Hey JesusR,
Just to make people have an easier time digesting this new record. Can you post the dyno graph and the uncorrected numbers. I am quite sure, that in that heat and humidity the raw numbers were slightly less than the corrected numbers. Or at least post the correction factor applied to reach the 469 awhp. I dont have a problem believing the numbers, people have on occasion doubted some of my times and MPH in the past. I had to scan the slips to make some doubters happy.
BTW, I remember you from back on the Supra forums when you had the T78 and then the T88. I have the T78 kit on my MKIV now. Didnt you use to run Garage Advance?
Brian
Just to make people have an easier time digesting this new record. Can you post the dyno graph and the uncorrected numbers. I am quite sure, that in that heat and humidity the raw numbers were slightly less than the corrected numbers. Or at least post the correction factor applied to reach the 469 awhp. I dont have a problem believing the numbers, people have on occasion doubted some of my times and MPH in the past. I had to scan the slips to make some doubters happy.
BTW, I remember you from back on the Supra forums when you had the T78 and then the T88. I have the T78 kit on my MKIV now. Didnt you use to run Garage Advance?
Brian
I believe it was done. The stock bottom end in the EVO is great, so that has little if anything to do with the power. 550 whp isn't a problem for the stock shortblock.
My RS on straight pump gas with no alky made 393 whp. Knowing the boost levels that I dyno'd it at and the sorry *** timing that you have to run with pump gas making an additional 70 whp with straight race gas and a real tune wouldn't be impossible.
Curt's 10 second run is great. I think that over time 10's aren't going to be as unbelievable on the stock turbo as more and more guys will end up doing it. Curt will always be the first.
Bottom line is the stock turbo on the EVO is a very hard part to beat. Stock upgraded turbos are proving more and more how hard it actually is.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
My RS on straight pump gas with no alky made 393 whp. Knowing the boost levels that I dyno'd it at and the sorry *** timing that you have to run with pump gas making an additional 70 whp with straight race gas and a real tune wouldn't be impossible.
Curt's 10 second run is great. I think that over time 10's aren't going to be as unbelievable on the stock turbo as more and more guys will end up doing it. Curt will always be the first.
Bottom line is the stock turbo on the EVO is a very hard part to beat. Stock upgraded turbos are proving more and more how hard it actually is.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Originally Posted by JesusR
Brian, it will be posted soon its in my brother's posession. Soon enough it will be posted. And yes it was me using the T78 back in 2001...and then the T88. And no, I didn't use to run Garage Advance, they did work on my car in the beginning.
Good job man
, can't wait for the dyno sheets.
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Orlando,FL-OceanDr-Miami FL
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I believe it was done. The stock bottom end in the EVO is great, so that has little if anything to do with the power. 550 whp isn't a problem for the stock shortblock.
My RS on straight pump gas with no alky made 393 whp. Knowing the boost levels that I dyno'd it at and the sorry *** timing that you have to run with pump gas making an additional 70 whp with straight race gas and a real tune wouldn't be impossible.
Curt's 10 second run is great. I think that over time 10's aren't going to be as unbelievable on the stock turbo as more and more guys will end up doing it. Curt will always be the first.
Bottom line is the stock turbo on the EVO is a very hard part to beat. Stock upgraded turbos are proving more and more how hard it actually is.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
My RS on straight pump gas with no alky made 393 whp. Knowing the boost levels that I dyno'd it at and the sorry *** timing that you have to run with pump gas making an additional 70 whp with straight race gas and a real tune wouldn't be impossible.
Curt's 10 second run is great. I think that over time 10's aren't going to be as unbelievable on the stock turbo as more and more guys will end up doing it. Curt will always be the first.
Bottom line is the stock turbo on the EVO is a very hard part to beat. Stock upgraded turbos are proving more and more how hard it actually is.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Jesus R
Originally Posted by CBRE
If anyone can pull this off it's Aerocomp, they have the money, facility and most important patience! Although running the hell out of the stock turbo is like beating a dead horse, no matter how many few extra HP you tweek out of it the stocker on a heavy Evo it's a snail. Any kind of decent time with that turbo means you will be in fourth gear before the 1/8th, then you have to ride the turd out the other half, feels so slow that you could fall asleep.
On the subject of my old 9.4 second Eclipse you must remember it was a budget car with just a VPC, 660's, and a 65# per minute turbo(thanks FP!)(FP3065), the car was light but it was built with less than $15k invested, never dyno tuned and ran 148.5mph at Norwalk, throw in a AEM and a bigger turbo and it would have been history.
On the subject of my old 9.4 second Eclipse you must remember it was a budget car with just a VPC, 660's, and a 65# per minute turbo(thanks FP!)(FP3065), the car was light but it was built with less than $15k invested, never dyno tuned and ran 148.5mph at Norwalk, throw in a AEM and a bigger turbo and it would have been history.
Hey Curt did u ever think of usin the fp3065 on ur evo since u already did a 9.4 on it with ur eclipse? thanks Curt
Originally Posted by 97awdman
Hey Curt did u ever think of usin the fp3065 on ur evo since u already did a 9.4 on it with ur eclipse? thanks Curt
Originally Posted by CBRE
That is a great turbo but with the heft of the Evo I need a good 100-200 more HP to even come close, the racecar was 2450 with me in it, my EVO is well over 3000 #'s and I still need a cage, what a sled!
Hahah cool thanks Curt, good luck and i look forward to some really nice numbers from ur Evo
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Im the owner of the Evo 8! We did 432whp with 400wtq in 3rd gear and 466whp XXXwtq Don't remmember! All this holding 22-23psi in 3rd and 24-26psi en 4th! Now were having problems that the car is only holding 17-18psi
! Soon will fix that problem and we will be testing it at the track!
Pd- I don't remmember where did i put the dyno's sheets! But this saturday were having a supra meet at the dyno! So ill be going over there and get it printed again!
Later i will give you guys an update on the car!
New Stuff
680 Inyectores
Roll bar
Springs and Retainers
Little ported head!
432whp with 400wtq in 3rd/466whp with xxxwtq in 4th
! Soon will fix that problem and we will be testing it at the track!Pd- I don't remmember where did i put the dyno's sheets! But this saturday were having a supra meet at the dyno! So ill be going over there and get it printed again!
Later i will give you guys an update on the car!
New Stuff
680 Inyectores
Roll bar
Springs and Retainers
Little ported head!
432whp with 400wtq in 3rd/466whp with xxxwtq in 4th
Last edited by BoostedJoe; Jun 27, 2005 at 07:29 AM.
no disrespect to you JesusR...but we all know david buschur, we all know curt brown....but for myself and i'm sure most of us on the board....if you make a somewhat outragous claim like you did...people are going to call BS on your story.
please post up a dyno graph and instead of everyone attatcking you....people will start congradulating you.
please post up a dyno graph and instead of everyone attatcking you....people will start congradulating you.
Originally Posted by Rez90
no disrespect to you JesusR...but we all know david buschur, we all know curt brown....but for myself and i'm sure most of us on the board....if you make a somewhat outragous claim like you did...people are going to call BS on your story.
please post up a dyno graph and instead of everyone attatcking you....people will start congradulating you.
please post up a dyno graph and instead of everyone attatcking you....people will start congradulating you.
Ditto,,,, DYNO SHEETTTTTTTTTTTTTT
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by Rez90
no disrespect to you JesusR...but we all know david buschur, we all know curt brown....but for myself and i'm sure most of us on the board....if you make a somewhat outragous claim like you did...people are going to call BS on your story.
please post up a dyno graph and instead of everyone attatcking you....people will start congradulating you.
please post up a dyno graph and instead of everyone attatcking you....people will start congradulating you.
Pd- Like i said soon i will post the Dyno Graph!
