Nisei FMIC
i have it and it's a great i/c. my intake temps dropped around 20 degrees. it was a noticeable gain. intake temps always match ambient temps, and as i boost the temps get cooler. thats my experience.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: World's largest Archipelago
Originally Posted by plokivos
i've never heard the end of buschur and ams discussion on nisei and their test method, etc.
Buschur FMIC and AMS, can't go wrong with it, but I do like the nisei.
Buschur FMIC and AMS, can't go wrong with it, but I do like the nisei.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: World's largest Archipelago
Originally Posted by nickracer9
i have it and it's a great i/c. my intake temps dropped around 20 degrees. it was a noticeable gain. intake temps always match ambient temps, and as i boost the temps get cooler. thats my experience.
I think David Buschur is right on the part where the Nisei fins are too dense which doesnt allow as much airflow to the radiator. I have showed a couple of friends and tuners and they all said the same thing about the airflow issue. Definately someone should test it against the other fmic's.
Originally Posted by LordEvoIX
That bad or are you another flame bait? 

as far as cooling goes my aem logs show the same engine temps before the i/c went in. i was comparing to stock intercooler. I also noticed my intake manifold and piping was barely warm as opposed to the stock i/c's hot to the touch. I believe most of the intercoolers out there are great, but the more surface area the greater the efficiency.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: World's largest Archipelago
Originally Posted by nickracer9
as far as cooling goes my aem logs show the same engine temps before the i/c went in. i was comparing to stock intercooler. I also noticed my intake manifold and piping was barely warm as opposed to the stock i/c's hot to the touch. I believe most of the intercoolers out there are great, but the more surface area the greater the efficiency.
If I'm not wrong, the extra power generated through the denser intake air should also generate more heat thus raising the water temp. It's all interconnected right? We need more reviews from unbiased users...the vendors war is fudging the facts up badly
The nisei fmic is a very tight fit & heavy.
Nice construction & a great warranty.
I needed to remove some material from the crash bar tabs that support the bumper skin, same thing on the bumper skin too.
undertray doesnt fit, unless to cut a lot off.
Nice construction & a great warranty.
I needed to remove some material from the crash bar tabs that support the bumper skin, same thing on the bumper skin too.
undertray doesnt fit, unless to cut a lot off.
Originally Posted by Derek888
I think David Buschur is right on the part where the Nisei fins are too dense which doesnt allow as much airflow to the radiator. I have showed a couple of friends and tuners and they all said the same thing about the airflow issue. Definately someone should test it against the other fmic's.
BR has 18 fins per inch while the Nisei is 13.
This link is for anyone who's concerned about the radiator temps changing.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...4&postcount=21
Cheers!


