Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Dyno Tested Buschur Racing's 20g

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #31  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
I realized that 28PSi is out of efficiency for the stocker. But could you please let the 20G spike to 30 PSI? Or you are out of injector at this point?
For the love of evo's god, please show me what the 20G is like at 30 PSI spike :}
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #32  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
It would be nice to see graphs of a 20G vs. a WR vs. an '05 16G at similar boost levels. I wonder if the WR would have a similar boost hit in the low rpms while retaining a respectable showing vs. the 20G in the upper rpms. Maybe there's a car in SoCal that has a 20G with stock cams, TBE, HFC, and a FMIC to compare to my WR equipped car? I dunno, just lookinig for ideas so we can see something not running meth (which most of us aren't).
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #33  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
The reason the tq is lower on the 20g was from the fact that the stock turbo was run to 28 psi tappering to 19-20psi, and the 20g only had to run 25psi in the middle and held 22-23psi through redline. IMHO the loss of TQ down low is not even noticed on the street, since most of the time your racing the rpms are above 5.5k where this turbo (20g) makes more power.
I respect what you're saying Doug, but what made this turbo attractive to me was the assertion that it improved high rpm power with low rpm power being at least as good (if not better) as the factory turbo. I spend 99.9% of my driving time on the street, with 95% of that time being spent at less than 5.5k rpm. I like the feel of a big midrange torque curve, and I damn sure wouldn't be satisfied if it dropped 60ft/lb at 4krpm for the sake of gaining 25hp at 7k rpm. If power above 5.5k rpm was all that concerned me, I'd install a GT series kit and get a LOT more power above 5.5k rpm.

I was considering this turbo slightly ahead of the WR as a viable upgrade, but the above chart has me troubled. I'm another one who would value a straight comparison between the factory turbo vs. the 20G with the same boost settings in the midrange.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:46 PM
  #34  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
Aww man, Ted, you made it sound so much better. :}
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #35  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Did you guys miss the stock turbo went to 28 psi on those runs and the 20G was only 22-23 psi?

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:50 PM
  #36  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
Talking

Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Did you guys miss the stock turbo went to 28 psi on those runs and the 20G was only 22-23 psi?

David Buschur
No, we (at least I) didn't. We are just asking for another run of the 20G at about the same Boost spike at the stock turbo's run. :}
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #37  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Yes. We wanted to see similar boost levels.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #38  
BadazzCR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 921
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Yes. We wanted to see similar boost levels.
here you go... stock turbo vs the BR20g. Both turbo's peaking at 25psi.

Run#3 is stock turbo 25psi tapper to 19psi
Run#5 is 20g turbo 25psi tapper to 22-23

Last edited by BadazzCR; Oct 26, 2005 at 02:59 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:56 PM
  #39  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I just posted a thread with my car and 20G graphs with a peak boost of 30 psi. It is under "two turbos two results".

My car on our dyno made 376 whp and 396 ft lbs of torque on its best pull. This is not a bonzai run, I had plenty of room left in timing and AFR's were in the mid 11's.

Peak HP was at 5,000 rpm and peak torque was at 4,500 rpm.

I realize I sell these 20G's and have a lot of time in them. They aren't without compromise as right now they have some surge issues and I have made that clear. This turbo is no GT35R, which is clear if you check out the other thread, it makes more power sooner.

Tomorrow I will look for the highest HP stock turbo I have here and compare the two charts for you guys.

My car at 22-23 psi has run 11.30 and a best MPH of 124. This is impressive I think.

With the boost where it is now and power where it is, I believe my car will run 10's at 127+ mph. We will see.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #40  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
Ssccchwweeet!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #41  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
This last comparison makes a big difference and is much better. The HP curves cross over much sooner, and there is much less area lost under the curve. My next question would be...why is the 20g not being boosted higher? Is it not supposed to, or is that just not tested yet?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #42  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
This last comparison makes a big difference and is much better.
Agreed. I'd still entertain an overlaying chart that shows what happens when the 20G is allowed to do its thing and run up to 30psi as quickly as physics allows.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 06:45 PM
  #43  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Wow, thanks Doug. Huge difference in that last chart from the first. Having them both peak at the same 25 psi makes the 20G look even better than it did the first time you posted the charts.

BTW, for those of you on the fence about what you want to do for a turbo give me another 2 weeks and I should have some new test results with the current 20G vs. this new design. The new design very well could work better, I am expecting it to.

As for a few comments made. One was someone wanted to see the 20G make 450 whp on a Dynojet.......well I'd venture to guess my car is close, I figure over 440 dynojet.

Also, someone said something about they didn't know what all the hype is about this turbo being so much better than the WR. Nobody at our shop has made that type of hype or statement. We will prove how good this turbo is as time goes on though. Hell as far as I am concerned I already have.

BTW, anyone that owns an AWD Dynojet dyno sheet for their car and has made 400 whp on the stock turbo, I'd dyno your car for free here, just to see what it will make.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 12:27 AM
  #44  
aps's Avatar
aps
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Türkey/İstanbul
What is the difference between spooling 20g and Tme 20g.Is ıt worth to buy Tme?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 04:07 AM
  #45  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
I'd be interested to see the boost curve for the 20G. The power seems to be falling off on the top end and I'm wondering whether that is conservative tuning or the boost tapering. I understand boost taper after the initial spike, but I would have expected the boost to taper only a bit on the top end after that initial taper from the spike.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 PM.