Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Just installed Vishniu Stage O Mods!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 06:40 PM
  #106  
RaX's Avatar
RaX
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu


At this time, not really. It's a bit too early to get anyone concerned about some of the things we've seen and documented with the EVOs we've tested. Once a conclusion is reached, I'll be happy to disclose whatever I know. Until then, the investigation continues. Don't worry... everyone involved is on the side of the consumer

Regards,
Shiv
Including Mitsu?

If there is indeed a problem, Mitsu better offer to either buy back the cars or give an extended warranty after they fix what's wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 07:48 PM
  #107  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Re: Re: Re: Re: Just installed Vishniu Stage O Mods!

Originally posted by silverEVO8


Well, great minds think alike I'm looking for a few significant mods I can do to my car, but I'm not interested in a shotgun approach or just bolting on crap for the hell of it. Frankly, what turns me off the most is what they seem to sell the most: flash, trash, blinkig lights and such..... Good grief, I wish they made stuff that would fit in unobtrusively and not too visibly. I prefer the clean and stealth type of mod. I don't want to call attention to the car of thieves, cops or ovezelaous techs at the dealer
I'm with you 100%. Looks like the most promising update just got put on hold by Shiv. Hope it's not something wide spread or too serious. But I am glad that he was able to identify that a problem exists. If not for his extensive testing we would probably have never known anything might be wrong. Guess that he has played more with the US EVO than the factory. His choice to hold back his kit until it is solved says alot about him and his company. I'm assuming by his cryptic post that is being consulted and hopefully they are assisting.

Last edited by jfh; Apr 27, 2003 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 08:01 PM
  #108  
Sunder's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu


PS. A/F is off-the-screen rich by 5600rpm so there's not much to look at. The extra fueling is critical for adequate knock surpression/charge cooling.

Shiv,

Since the fuel is there for knock suppression and charge cooling, wouldn't it be possible say, to install a water/meth injection kit to do the same function, so that you could lean the fuel out more, while retaining safety?

I imagine emissions, fuel economy and smoother power delivery would be some benefits of doing so.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 08:23 PM
  #109  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by RaX

Including Mitsu?
Yes, they have been absolutely awesome. Never seen a auto company react so quickly and be so helpful on so many levels.

shiv
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #110  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by Sunder


Shiv,

Since the fuel is there for knock suppression and charge cooling, wouldn't it be possible say, to install a water/meth injection kit to do the same function, so that you could lean the fuel out more, while retaining safety?

I imagine emissions, fuel economy and smoother power delivery would be some benefits of doing so.

Yep, that's the whole idea behind water injection. I've seen it used in some good applications with good success. I've also seen it used as a big fat band-aid in order to keep a poorly tuned motor from detting to death. We're testing a system right now. May have some merit for a car running so much boost on pump gas.

Best Regards,
Shiv
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 02:16 PM
  #111  
GR-VIII's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Chicago area
Tuning sounds like it going well.
I'll do minimal mods cause to me the EVO runs pretty well and fast enough.
More than anything, I'm more impressed with it's handling and braking and its ride over bumpy roads and those awesome seats.

But, I am concerned about something. I'm about to buy an EVO but those dyno numbers don't look promising. If 180hp to the wheels is true in stock form, then this car is suffering a 33% driveline loss. That is unheard of even for an AWD.
Either there is something wrong with the dyno or testing method or Mits is bringing and selling a product that is not living up to it's marketing and promise. Truth in advertising is important.
As much as I like handling and all around competence in a car, I still expect to get the power I'm paying for.

In this whole thread this hasn't been brought up. Am I wrong in my thinking? Is so, why, can someone explain why there is such low power output from a supposed 271hp engine?

GR-VIII
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #112  
theheff's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Do a search noob-- this has been beaten to death and refried a million times over.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #113  
GR-VIII's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Chicago area
Hey Heff, if you have something intelligent to offer then offer it.
If you don't then don't. I know my way around the internet very well thank you and don't need your simplistic advice.
If you can't answer the question, then don't say anything.

As far as being a "noob", I've been into cars for a long while now.
I don't think I qualify for "noob" status, but thanks for considering me anyway.

GR-VIII
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #114  
Speedlimit's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 101
From: NR Reading PA
Hi,

There was several threads and a "lively" (as in war) discussion of this last month. The summary is:

The only valid dyno numbers for different cars are from the SAME dyno and Vishnu has numbers to show lower than expected DIFFERENCES between an EVO VIII and EVO VII and a WRX. Almost all of that difference was accounted for because of the California 91 Octane gas (180whp). There are still some unexplained differences which are being discussed with Mitsy. The rest of the country is seeing close to the advertised 271hp, as stated on Vishnu's website.

If you are in California, then you need to consider the decrease in performance resulting from 91 octane. If not, then knock simply is not an issue with 93 octane gas and stock boost pressure. The cars are very quick and at or above the 271hp stock as advertised.

Hope this helps...

Speedlimit.........
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 03:23 PM
  #115  
GR-VIII's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Chicago area
Originally posted by Speedlimit
Hi,

There was several threads and a "lively" (as in war) discussion of this last month. The summary is:

The only valid dyno numbers for different cars are from the SAME dyno and Vishnu has numbers to show lower than expected DIFFERENCES between an EVO VIII and EVO VII and a WRX. Almost all of that difference was accounted for because of the California 91 Octane gas (180whp). There are still some unexplained differences which are being discussed with Mitsy. The rest of the country is seeing close to the advertised 271hp, as stated on Vishnu's website.

If you are in California, then you need to consider the decrease in performance resulting from 91 octane. If not, then knock simply is not an issue with 93 octane gas and stock boost pressure. The cars are very quick and at or above the 271hp stock as advertised.

Hope this helps...

Speedlimit.........
Yes! Thank you very much.

Not to keep this going, but how much driveline loss is there in the EVO, percentage? We have 93 available all the time.

GR-VIII
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #116  
Speedlimit's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 101
From: NR Reading PA
Driveline loss on AWD cars vary from an urban legend of 15% to a more realistic 23 to 28%.

Speedlimit.........
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #117  
Sunder's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by Speedlimit
Driveline loss on AWD cars vary from an urban legend of 15% to a more realistic 23 to 28%.

Speedlimit.........
ROTFLOL 15%

My rear wheel drive car, on a CHASIS dyno, recorded a loss of 17%. As if any AWD drive car on a WHEEL dyno, is going to record 15%
Reply
Old May 1, 2003 | 07:32 PM
  #118  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Sunder


ROTFLOL 15%

My rear wheel drive car, on a CHASIS dyno, recorded a loss of 17%. As if any AWD drive car on a WHEEL dyno, is going to record 15%
urban legend of 15% to a more realistic 23 to 28%

I believe that the "urban legend" caveat on the 15% speaks for itself. 23-28% is a reasonable estimate for AWD. What's the beef?
Reply
Old May 1, 2003 | 08:01 PM
  #119  
Speedlimit's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 101
From: NR Reading PA
Originally posted by Sunder


ROTFLOL 15%

My rear wheel drive car, on a CHASIS dyno, recorded a loss of 17%. As if any AWD drive car on a WHEEL dyno, is going to record 15%
Hi Sunder!

Urban legend in this hemisphere means Kangaroo doo in Oz.

Speedlimit.....
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 01:00 AM
  #120  
Sunder's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Ah, okay...

I thought urban legend meant "something that has some element of truth behind it, but nobody can prove whether it's true or not"...

Kinda like the the urban legend about crocodiles in the sewers...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:15 AM.