Full-Race Twinscroll 35R
GEOFF
I will also be at etown the 25th if she don't blow up going for the 500+ mark on the 11th.. Not sure if I'm going to race but that depends how it does on its tune.... maybe ill park my ride by your stand??? Also I'm going to pm you in a day or so to chat and to get some info... ttyl...
I will also be at etown the 25th if she don't blow up going for the 500+ mark on the 11th.. Not sure if I'm going to race but that depends how it does on its tune.... maybe ill park my ride by your stand??? Also I'm going to pm you in a day or so to chat and to get some info... ttyl...
Evolving Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Geoff, all I'm getting at is that it's very hard to believe you optimized the header design without EVER testing it on the car. How did you arrive at the header's runner volume and/or length and/or bend radii? Was it all eyeballed?
Like I said, normally it goes: test first, then release product. This bassackwards approach is totally baffling. It's practically indefensible.
I'm sure your success on other platforms was not achieved in this manner... your reputation for good product makes this approach with the Evo that much more puzzling.
Like I said, normally it goes: test first, then release product. This bassackwards approach is totally baffling. It's practically indefensible.
I'm sure your success on other platforms was not achieved in this manner... your reputation for good product makes this approach with the Evo that much more puzzling.
Geoff, all I'm getting at is that it's very hard to believe you optimized the header design without EVER testing it on the car. How did you arrive at the header's runner volume and/or length and/or bend radii? Was it all eyeballed?
Like I said, normally it goes: test first, then release product. This bassackwards approach is totally baffling. It's practically indefensible.
I'm sure your success on other platforms was not achieved in this manner... your reputation for good product makes this approach with the Evo that much more puzzling.
Like I said, normally it goes: test first, then release product. This bassackwards approach is totally baffling. It's practically indefensible.
I'm sure your success on other platforms was not achieved in this manner... your reputation for good product makes this approach with the Evo that much more puzzling.
Yes, Full-Race draws something pretty, then makes it....
IF you have ever looked at any of there manifolds you can see there was an TON of time put in to designing it.
Have you designed a manifold before?
Scorke
That what the F Im talking about!
I don't know if you've ever driven a 3076R equipped EVO, but if you have, you'll know the difference immediately.
Naturally that will depend heavily upon your other hardware and tuning capability, but it will be interesting to see if you can get there with the .78 A/R housing. I might also suggest running 2-3psi more boost than you ordinarily would, and see where that puts you.
Naturally that will depend heavily upon your other hardware and tuning capability, but it will be interesting to see if you can get there with the .78 A/R housing. I might also suggest running 2-3psi more boost than you ordinarily would, and see where that puts you.
I don't know if you've ever driven a 3076R equipped EVO, but if you have, you'll know the difference immediately.
Naturally that will depend heavily upon your other hardware and tuning capability, but it will be interesting to see if you can get there with the .78 A/R housing. I might also suggest running 2-3psi more boost than you ordinarily would, and see where that puts you.
Naturally that will depend heavily upon your other hardware and tuning capability, but it will be interesting to see if you can get there with the .78 A/R housing. I might also suggest running 2-3psi more boost than you ordinarily would, and see where that puts you.
other mods
revolver cams
supertech valve train
coil on plug
fmic
icp
forge RS bov
forge unos mbc
100%meth ''coolingmist''
3.0 d/p
3.5 d/p back exhaust
1000cc injectors
walbro f/p
perrin fuel rail
custom 4.0 intake
stock ecu..
i think thats the most of it. im sure im missing a few things but thats the inportent stuff...
and no i never driven a 3076r YET. lol
I don't know if you've ever driven a 3076R equipped EVO, but if you have, you'll know the difference immediately.
Naturally that will depend heavily upon your other hardware and tuning capability, but it will be interesting to see if you can get there with the .78 A/R housing. I might also suggest running 2-3psi more boost than you ordinarily would, and see where that puts you.
Naturally that will depend heavily upon your other hardware and tuning capability, but it will be interesting to see if you can get there with the .78 A/R housing. I might also suggest running 2-3psi more boost than you ordinarily would, and see where that puts you.
You think the .78 is too tight? Its like a .58 undivided housing right?
im going to run as much boost as i can..... weather its 26psi or 68 psi. whatever i can get out of it on a strong tune is the goal....
other mods
revolver cams
supertech valve train
coil on plug
fmic
icp
forge RS bov
forge unos mbc
100%meth ''coolingmist''
3.0 d/p
3.5 d/p back exhaust
1000cc injectors
walbro f/p
perrin fuel rail
custom 4.0 intake
stock ecu..
i think thats the most of it. im sure im missing a few things but thats the inportent stuff...
and no i never driven a 3076r YET. lol
other mods
revolver cams
supertech valve train
coil on plug
fmic
icp
forge RS bov
forge unos mbc
100%meth ''coolingmist''
3.0 d/p
3.5 d/p back exhaust
1000cc injectors
walbro f/p
perrin fuel rail
custom 4.0 intake
stock ecu..
i think thats the most of it. im sure im missing a few things but thats the inportent stuff...
and no i never driven a 3076r YET. lol
i wonder what the price difference would be and what difference in power also..