Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur 35r lag video........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #46  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
Originally Posted by GT35REVO8
wow a cocky **** huh?lol...and who cares what DJ read?lol ok....that makes a lot of sense.

wow 452awhp?!?!and that means what to me?ive taken cars with more..noob

oh sorry almost forgot...AMS 35Rs own buschur 35Rs...
Losing brownie points here bud!!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 01:40 AM
  #47  
GT35REVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Originally Posted by Jasil
Losing brownie points here bud!!
uhhh ok..

anyways i think you may be a little off.i dont think the difference between MD and DJ is that big of a difference.

from what my tuner said,he dynoed at 375awhp with a full-race GT35R and he said thats roughly 425awhp on a dyno-jet.he/I could be wrong but i dont see almost 75hp difference in the 2 dynos,who knows though.

and 452awhp on a 35R at 22psi with stock block etc etc is really good,and from the videos it doesnt look to be that way,but again its a video.

ill try and get a video of mine.22 psi/92octane.just to maybe compare the two set ups.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 01:53 AM
  #48  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
I don't care about dyno numbers I care about track times. Buschur's dyno does indeed read very low 850whp and 169mph traps should tell anybody that. In the end dynos don't mean diddly their purpose is for tuning not bench racing.

This was the quote that made you lose brownie points
oh sorry almost forgot...AMS 35Rs own buschur 35Rs...
Why would you say that? I've read your posts and you seem to just jump on the latest EVOM buzzword. As far as the kits go they can be had with the exact same turbo except you get a bigger wastegate with Buschur, a Shearer manifold if you choose, for 600$ less than a AMS kit, but the AMS kit has a intake too. You can opt for Buschur's cast manifold kit and still put down 500whp+ for almost $1800 less than a AMS kit, so I'm not sure where your going with you AMS owns Buschur statement both shops seem to be co existing quite well.

Both shops are excellent and to make statements like that shows a lack of something IMO.

Last edited by Jasil; Oct 15, 2007 at 06:15 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 02:47 AM
  #49  
GT35REVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Originally Posted by Jasil
I don't care about dyno numbers I care about track times. Buschur's dyno does indeed read very low 850whp and 169mph traps should tell anybody that. In the end dynos don't mean diddly their purpose is for tuning not bench racing.

This was the quote that made you lose brownie points

Why would you say that? I've read your posts and you seem to just jump on the latest EVOM buzzword. As far as the kits go they can be had with the exact same turbo except you get a bigger wastegate with Buschur, a Shearer manifold if you choose, for 600$ less than a AMS kit, but the AMS kit has a intake too. You can opt for Buschur's cast manifold kit and still put down 500whp+ for almost $1800 less than a AMS kit, so I'm not sure where your going with you AMS owns Buschur statement both shops seem to be co existing quite well.

Both shops are excellent and to make statements like shows a lack of something IMO.
wow,damn sorry.haha...it was a joke to him.b/c he has a buschur kit and i run AMS,no hard feelings.i love them all.

and i jump on the latest evom buzzword?lol,yeah thats why im going a total opposite direction then anyone else for the most part.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 06:23 AM
  #50  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
No hard feelings here either.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #51  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by GT35REVO8
so what is 377awhp on a DJ?
425-435 whp
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #52  
vwjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas and HATING it
Originally Posted by Jasil
I don't care about dyno numbers I care about track times. Buschur's dyno does indeed read very low 850whp and 169mph traps should tell anybody that. In the end dynos don't mean diddly their purpose is for tuning not bench racing.

This was the quote that made you lose brownie points

Why would you say that? I've read your posts and you seem to just jump on the latest EVOM buzzword. As far as the kits go they can be had with the exact same turbo except you get a bigger wastegate with Buschur, a Shearer manifold if you choose, for 600$ less than a AMS kit, but the AMS kit has a intake too. You can opt for Buschur's cast manifold kit and still put down 500whp+ for almost $1800 less than a AMS kit, so I'm not sure where your going with you AMS owns Buschur statement both shops seem to be co existing quite well.

Both shops are excellent and to make statements like that shows a lack of something IMO.
Thanks man I tought I was gonna come unglued there


Man all I was trying to do is promote what a great turbo kit this is for the money with right parts to go with it. There always has to be some HATER on here, trying to be rockstar... amazing!

I try for better video... spool in 3rd is around 4600.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #53  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Originally Posted by crcain
I like the intent of making a vid which shows how different setups drive.. so thanks to the OP. However, what would be a vastly superior format, is some driving through bends, and a stop light here and there. You don't need to point the camera at the tach for the viewer to tell.

If your intent is to show when you reach full boost, could you not just post a datalog?

Also, I thought David Buschur himself agreed full boost on a 2 litre / 35R was about 5200 rpm in 3rd? That is about what I saw with myself, and also is what was concluded in the "35R Spoolup Answers" thread.

And to all those people that dismiss lag, if you drive your car through stop lights, ever want to overtake without downshifting, etc... believe me lag is there.

My personal take on my old setup was... that I really did not like driving in those rev ranges all that much. Constantly ringing out the car at the higher end of the revs was just unpleasant. What I always loved about a stock setup evo was that torque that was always there. Stock'ish 2 litre + 35R just does not have torque all over.
+1
I don't understand how people see anything in those videos... You see a tach rising...ok... Props for trying, though.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #54  
JordanS4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax
Originally Posted by GT35REVO8
uhhh ok..

anyways i think you may be a little off.i dont think the difference between MD and DJ is that big of a difference.

from what my tuner said,he dynoed at 375awhp with a full-race GT35R and he said thats roughly 425awhp on a dyno-jet.he/I could be wrong but i dont see almost 75hp difference in the 2 dynos,who knows though.
nope he is absolutely correct. most dyno jet's read anywhere from 15-20% higher than a Mustang Dyno. There are some exceptionally low reading Mustang Dyno's, like Buschur, CBRD, and DTM. I have personally seen as much as a 25% difference although the car may have changed a bit for the worse between runs. Anyways on topic. To the OP, that looked very quick for a 3rd gear pull. Since you are running a generally low boost for a 35R are you able to use alot of timing during spool without knock? That was at least 500 RPM sooner than any 35R I've ever seen.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #55  
GT35REVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Originally Posted by vwjeff
Thanks man I tought I was gonna come unglued there


Man all I was trying to do is promote what a great turbo kit this is for the money with right parts to go with it. There always has to be some HATER on here, trying to be rockstar... amazing!

I try for better video... spool in 3rd is around 4600.
hater?umm no why would i hate?i have the same set up as you practically?lol,so im not hating one bit.and 377awhp on a DJ like the guy above you said is about 425-435awhp,which i was right.so no hate here one bit.

Im gonna try and get a video of mine today.boost,lag,rpm,etc....

what runs did you do?id like to compare.3rd gear/RPM?4th gear/RPM?etc etc...
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 02:27 PM
  #56  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
even with a video the human eye doesn't see everything. Get a MAP sensor and post a log of boost vs. RPM. A bunch of us contributed our info to this thread:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...=gt35r+spoolup

There are WAY more people with 35r cars now, it would be very intersting to see the results.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #57  
Jiggler's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: md
that was really good, wondering what a twinscroll would do
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #58  
vwjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas and HATING it
GT35REVO8 your a tool man. I dont see any of your times posted.... get real bro.

Something else I never hardly ever see are AMS car with times... WTF?
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 04:16 PM
  #59  
vwjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas and HATING it
Originally Posted by JordanS4
nope he is absolutely correct. most dyno jet's read anywhere from 15-20% higher than a Mustang Dyno. There are some exceptionally low reading Mustang Dyno's, like Buschur, CBRD, and DTM. I have personally seen as much as a 25% difference although the car may have changed a bit for the worse between runs. Anyways on topic. To the OP, that looked very quick for a 3rd gear pull. Since you are running a generally low boost for a 35R are you able to use alot of timing during spool without knock? That was at least 500 RPM sooner than any 35R I've ever seen.
yes man my timing is very high during spool.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #60  
GT35REVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Originally Posted by vwjeff
GT35REVO8 your a tool man. I dont see any of your times posted.... get real bro.

Something else I never hardly ever see are AMS car with times... WTF?
well if you want you can come to hawaii and look for a 1/4 track if you want,but guess what we dont have one.it shutdown march of 06.b/c hawaii is a gay state,and think that closing a track is smart.

but sorry you would die on the street.

wait i did go to the track once with this setup...and you did 127mph on race and high boost?man thats not bad,but i practically did that on pump gas 21 psi.(123mph)..get over yourself.and yes 127mph is more then 123mph,i figured your gonna say that,but with 21psi vs 29psi and pump vs race..4mph isnt ****

Last edited by GT35REVO8; Oct 15, 2007 at 06:21 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:31 AM.