Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

ATP Turbo Kit

Old Dec 3, 2007 | 07:20 AM
  #46  
GTVEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
From: Ozark, MO
Originally Posted by Mellon
take a nicely tuned 30R at 25psi on 93 octane vs a 20G at 25psi and I think you'll see a signficant difference.
You are right on target with your observation in my experience also.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 07:32 AM
  #47  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Originally Posted by Evo8Emperor
I dunno how you can over look 9sec9's new numbers on the green. All he had done is some head work and cams along with tuning of course. But everything else was stock. Ive always wanted a 35R but with those numbers he posted especially 500 ft/lbs of torque. His tune boost or torque dont spike so all i can say is it came on early.
that's with every mod under the sun, VP import race fuel, 30 degrees of timing, 37psi spike with meth/ water sprayed on top. Not exactly typical results because very few people if anyone else is going to push it that hard, however it is impressive.

my point is, the green is going to have to be pushed to the limit to do what a larger turbo can do easily.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 08:05 AM
  #48  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
I think alot of people upgrade to bigger turbos before getting the most out of the stock turbo.

The people looking to upgrade to a bigger turbo should post their current mods and current 1/4 times. If you aren't running mid 11s on the stock turbo then you shouldn't be looking at a bigger turbo should be looking for the bottleneck on your current configuration.

If you are running mid 11s and want more I wouldn't recommend anything but a large turbo or nitrous. Most of the medium sized turbos make more power but the useable powerband isn't as good as stock.

Think about how many people are running the green/20G turbos but less then 10 are in the 10s. The ones that made it have more $$$ invested than ever should have been.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 08:14 AM
  #49  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
there's two ways to go fast: create a very efficient setup, couple it with good tuning and great driving or throw so many damn parts at it that the car has no choice but to go fast
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #50  
GTVEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
From: Ozark, MO
Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
If you aren't running mid 11s on the stock turbo then you shouldn't be looking at a bigger turbo should be looking for the bottleneck on your current configuration.
Not completely accurate in my opinion, keep in mind David Buschur ran 11.60s on the stock turbo with the 2003 evo 8 and he is one of the best drivers on this board so a typical or new driver will not be able to replicate unless he has alot more parts and more agressive / unsafe - edge tuning. Keep in mind their are so many vars that you can't say every car should run this with this when they are close to being in stock form. The stock turbo is great but it doesn't mean its the answer to easy 11's for everyone.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #51  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
Even on the DSM the 16G has always been an 11 second performer.

85% of the 11.99-11.00 cars are stock turbo powered.

It doesn't take much of a driver to launch and shift an EVO.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #52  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Jeff, mid 11's on the stock turbo is a tall order, based on your signature you haven't done it yet either so I'm not sure why you're so quick to make it seem attainable by most.

there's also a distinct difference between what to expect on pump vs race gas on a stock turbo and you have to let us know which you're referring to.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #53  
GTVEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
From: Ozark, MO
Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
Even on the DSM the 16G has always been an 11 second performer.

85% of the 11.99-11.00 cars are stock turbo powered.

It doesn't take much of a driver to launch and shift an EVO.
A better look would be how many 16g evos ran 11's and how many have not ran 11s. I will think you will get my point, the 16g on the dsm is an evo3 16g that is a bit different than the 03 evo turbo similar yes. I don't consider myself a bad driver but I really don't think my car would of ran 11.99 easily on the stock turbo either unless I ran the **** out of it. Running it once and consistantly is the point also, this is just my experience with the 03's setup.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #54  
tweakdsm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
OT: imagine i got 35R Custom, lol, people who complain about turbo lag and They dont even own one,Perfect street turbo, full boost just above 4K, Ive spent maybe $2000 to build it, turbo was the most expensive part in that project, i go cheap and fast, so far 5k on the turbo no problems, dialy driven.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #55  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Originally Posted by tweakdsm
OT: imagine i got 35R Custom, lol, people who complain about turbo lag and They dont even own one,Perfect street turbo, full boost just above 4K, Ive spent maybe $2000 to build it, turbo was the most expensive part in that project, i go cheap and fast, so far 5k on the turbo no problems, dialy driven.

no offense but your post doesn't really say much without dyno or track times...saying your "fast" isn't good enough
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #56  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Mellon
no offense but your post doesn't really say much without dyno or track times...saying your "fast" isn't good enough
im confused, r u for or against ATP?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #57  
tweakdsm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
Im confused myself. No i do not own ATP kit and my post was OT, off topic saying about turbo lag experience, dont twist the thread. So if i pm you with track times and dyno pulls, and how much money I invested, do i get a cookie? I'm not here to impress somone or other people on this board.

Originally Posted by Mellon
no offense but your post doesn't really say much without dyno or track times...saying your "fast" isn't good enough
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #58  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
im confused, r u for or against ATP?
neither, I'm for backing up comments with data
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #59  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Originally Posted by tweakdsm
Im confused myself. No i do not own ATP kit and my post was OT, off topic saying about turbo lag experience, dont twist the thread. So if i pm you with track times and dyno pulls, and how much money I invested, do i get a cookie? I'm not here to impress somone or other people on this board.
it's not about impressing people, it's about educating people. Simply saying in essence "I've got great mods and I'm fast" doesn't tell us a thing.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #60  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Mellon
it's not about impressing people, it's about educating people. Simply saying in essence "I've got great mods and I'm fast" doesn't tell us a thing.
ok well im telling u that i have the ATP 3037s and dynoed 472whp 426tq on ICS's dynojet with 93oct, 25psi and 100% meth injection. i have the dynosheet out there.

im not trying to impress anyone, im just trying to show some people on here that the ATP kit isnt a bad kit. and i make 25psi at 4500-4600.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 PM.